2. demolition
Avi , |
Boston USA |
|
(07.17.05) |
Who will pay for the demolition? There are no takers. Maybe because it's stupid, idiotic, ludicrous to destroy good homes and good sources of livelihood (the greenhouses), in an area for such terrible poverty as the Gaza Strip. If disengagement is a first step toward peace, then would it be logical, as an active goodwill, that Israel enjoy giving and that the Palestinians enjoy receiving? From a practical standpoint the farmers using the greenhouses today employed Palestinians who will be given these greenhouses enable them to make a better life for themselves and their children, instead of finding themselves unemployed with no future.
Maybe this could be the first small step in solving the conflict.
Considering the housing in which the majority of Gaza residents live could some enjoy moving into modern housing? Wouldn't this decrease the reason for conflict?
The loses? The Palestinian politicians?
If the Hamas choose to dance on the rooftops, or destroy the property left behind let them. It will be like A daily labor cutting off his right arm rendering him jobless.
The Palestinian Authority must choose peace and prosperity with economic rewards or continued conflict and poverty for the populace. Israel must make it clear internationally that if the Palestinians want peace the strategic alternatives of a better life and peace for their citizens they will protect the property and put it to good use.
|