B"H It is certainly understandable why these MK's are very unhappy with Lieberman's entry into the government. His platform places their jobs at risk, with government representing levels slated to go up to limit their representation. These folks are fighting for their due share of the taxpayer money. They need to stand up for themselves and their salaries on this issue to stay in power. That what the basic concern is: their power.

How do you say "I am irrelevant" in arabic?

and your arab villages on the other side of the Israeli border. Your hatred for this country and your open and active support for our enemies merits that kind of a response. Take your filthy hatred for us and all of your constituents and join your Palestinian bretheren. We'd all be better off. Lieberman is exactly who I will continue to vote for until your treasonous asses are gone.

They should be tried for treason for their support of Hizballah and Syria

Your comments support world opinion that Zionism is racism. We can no longer refute that......

What is happening about the indictment against Bishara and Jamal Zahalka who went to Syria during the recent war? In the wake of Bishara's 2001 visit, the Knesset passed a law prohibiting Knesset members from traveling to enemy countries. They flagrantly broke this law and the penalty is 4 years. Why are they still out and about and inciting !

And it definitely is not a world opinion that Zionism means racism, just your's and your friends at ISM. Personally, I don't know anybody who would agree with you. Now, why those terrible 'Zionist' won't just toss you out of Israel is beyond me.

Fiona, the definition of a "prejudiced" person is someone who ignores all evidence that disputes those views he cherishes, and who is prone to exaggeration of all evidence that agrees with those views that he cherishes. Take your view of Zionism as a case in point. It's no certainty that when A=B and B=C that A=C (inductive reasoning). It is only sometimes true, and it may be false more often than it is true, as in the case of Zionism. For it to be always true, B would have to describe the entirety of B for all times and places. Do you really think you can make a convincing argument that a view that you see as racist given by ONE person on ONE talkback for ONE publication on ONE day is as if that person personified everything that is Zionism? Absolutely not. But you could certainly perceive it to be if you ignore all the evidence that disputes your viewpoint, which on the whole does NOT make Zionism the equivalent of racism. But this is without question - You are definitely prejudiced, and your statement and logic reflect the tendentiousness of your bigoted viewpoint. Zionism is a 2 millenia old ideal that predates Islam, that circulated amongst Jews in the diaspora to one day return to the homes they were expelled from and establish a sovereign homeland where, since they are considered indigenous nowhere else, they could act upon our national aspirations to live as we wish to, not as other nations require of us to live. Of course, had those who squatted on our Lands been more friendly, we'd be living side by side in peace - there was never any significant stream of Zionism that sought to expel those who lived here already. The real bigotry is not of Jews to Arabs, but the reverse.