News
December deadliest month for US troops in Iraq
Associated Press
Published: 31.12.06, 10:18
Comment Comment
Print comment Print comment
Back to article
9 Talkbacks for this article
1. You go..
Elokim ,   Israel   (12.31.06)
Saddam..oh wait ...now it's Bush in command of Iraq. Wow, I was confused there for a second with the high death toll!! Hmmmm makes you wonder huh....if we killed the right dictator?????
2. Iran is responsible for much this.
Johnson ,   USA   (12.31.06)
3. THE MISGUIDED JOHNSON #2
MAHMOOD ,   LONDON-UK   (12.31.06)
Really Johnson? Then how come your own people in the hierachy are soliciting co-operation of Iran to bring about stability in Iraq?
4. #3 You just answered your own question..
Johnson ,   USA   (01.01.07)
Because Iran is causing a lot of the problems.
5. JOHNSON GETS IT WRONG #4
MAHMOOD ,   LONDON-UK   (01.01.07)
Oh,no,Johnson.That is not the reason.Then how come the Taliban issue few years back also made various dignitaries from USA making shuttle visits to Switzerland.Where and how was Iran involved at that time.If the reason is what you state, then how come when it comes to the Iranian nuclear talks,the Bush administration is making uranium issue a big deal as a precondition.Johnson, you can fool some of your people in your area,not all, I am afraid.
6. MAHMOOD - Your not fooling anybody
Johnson ,   USA   (01.01.07)
One simple fact is a majority of the new and improved - improvised explosive devices IED's, or roadside bombs are what is killing our troops have been supplied by Iran. Go figure.
7. JOHNSON AVOIDS THE QUESTION #6
MAHMOOD ,   LONDON-UK   (01.01.07)
Johnson,it is imperative that you read the findings conducted by the British Intelligence.I am sure, you never even read the articles pertaining to that.However, the conclusions drawn in their report clearly stated that there was NO reason to conclude that Iran was supplying these high-tech explosives to the Iraqi insurgence.Anyway,however hard you try to make your point the fact is Iranian arms were sold to various countries............once again,like the way USA does it,gives to the puppet regime in the vicinity to be used not necessarily in one particular conflict,mind you.If these regime decide to supply such armaments to others,hardly does anyone question USA.Are you with me,Johnson? Most importantly,you have avoided my explanation of Iranian position altogether.For your information, the onesided scenerio that you have been witnessing in the Middle East has come to an end,Johnson.You have to live with new realities.Coming months will make my point more and more clearer to you.So, be on board,Johnson.
8. Did I hit a nerve? Want to cut my throat?
Johnson ,   USA   (01.01.07)
You keep contridicting yourself. At least I am consistant. I am not here to debate ME policy with you in these talkbacks. Plenty of arms are sold by plenty of countries. However, you just admited that Iran is actively selling arms, thus confirming my origional position in this matter. By the way your last bit was a little threatening, and British Intelligence, if not the IDF has your #. Hows that for reality? Happy New Year
9. JOHNSON...YOU ARE DEVIATING#8
MAHMOOD ,   LONDON-UK   (01.01.07)
Expressing your views is not a crime.Once again you have deviated from the point.It was only two months back that the official Iranian Agency reported having sold various types of weapons to quite a few countries.Why should I be the one to admit,Johnson?I am nether contradicting my statement nor am I trying to say anything more than necessary.From the tone of your talk-back I am pretty confident that you have got the message.
Back to article