HARDER . Reality Check , world

Because that's what you people said fro the first gulf war, the second gulf war etc. When will we actually see this Mother of all wars??? Reality check guyblow!!!

in 2008 to get a high approval rating then leave the mess to the next president.

1.5 bilion of idiots

you will just do it...

Blair should shut up. It is none of his business to be meddling in these matters.

But you can bet your sweet ass that the American military has a detailed plan for that last minute decision. I'm sure the IAF is making plans as well. What you can be sure of is that the Eurowimps will not participate. They will as usual be standing on the sidelines, crying crocodile tears & criticizing American aggression while breathing a sigh of relief that someone else had the balls to do it.

Unfortunately it won't be published beforehand. Keep asking though, it'll make it less of a shock when it happens:)

Iran should worry first about the Saudis, who are not very happy about the corrupt Shia blasphemers in Iran wanting to create some big shia criminal empire. But if the US attacks first, expect the same as Iraq. Easy victory for America.

Extremists always talk tough until they are dragged out out of their rat holes and hung for the world to see.

that fighting wars for Israel is not a good idea.

I pray G-D gives wisdom and power to Bush to wipe off the map Iran. And that all the lefties democrats chicken chit do not interfere.

Has for many years been enacting a long term plan involving spreading the word, buying support and sowing dissent and conflict. How else can it spread Islamo Facism. To solve the problems of the Middle East you must first cut off the funding. That means Iran. Its not a question anymore of if... Simply a question of when. Iran's actions have stymied the spread of democracy across the middle east and their open support for Hamas, Hezbollah and for Shiite militants in Iraq is enough of a smoking gun for the US. The nuclear question is another... There will be regional conflict and terror attacks worldwide... But if you cut off the head... the body always dies...

Chamberlain appeased Hitler who made a total fool out him and the British Government. PM Blair is falling into the same trap. Maybe his successor, Pasha Gordon Brown, will be the Prime Minister of the Islamic Kingdom of Britanistan with Londonabad its capital! The National Anthem will be God Help the Queen in tune to the chant of “Blood and Death” that we hear daily from the "Islamists" or, as the media call them, “militants”.

It will come sooner than you think.

The problem is, while they are doing military excercises, purchases, and preparing, our great nations sit in congress or parliament and talk about it. Talk talk talk. Irans decisions internally are not up for debate. Reminds me of Pearl harbour, talk talk talk, then wham. I guess we have to react now. Maybe if Iran is eliminated from the map, I can have the land, I'll call it Ryanville, we'll be a monarchy government but ran with honesty, fairness and openness to all residents, we can hold a world monopoly as a glass supplier. hahahahaha

Funny, seems to me, I see and hear a lot of Death to America Chants from Islamic groups long before the Iraq war. You see it as defending Israel. Do you even listen to the rhetoric from Islamic leaders. If they did succeed in eliminating Israel, You actually think they would stop there. World domination under Sharia law is the goal. And Earth to R. in Atlanta, you live in this world. So unless you want to pray 5 times a day or have your head cut off, let the intelligent people do the speaking and the thinking, protect the country that protects and provides for you, and go where your told, and do what your told.

How you doing? No point cutting the tail off a snake (hizbullah, palis, al quaeda) They need to cut the head off, and everything will funnel from there. But this snake has two heads. Iran and Pakistan. ps. I really thought those hawks were pressing for a playoff spot, but 10 in a row, ouch. Free up some cap room, and get rid of Khabi, and Aucoin.

This time round thing are going to be different,DR.I have time and again stated to you that dont dream of Sddam and his era and the Israeli raid on Osirak plant.That was history and will not repeat,unfortunately,You ca,in the meantime,dream beat the war scenerio and enjoy the whimsical and unfounded results that you yourself know of.

Israel, Pakistan, India, China, Russia, France, Britian, U.S., etc., have nuclear weapons. How can you deny Iran the same?

Because,Thomas,Iran could shift the balance of power in the region.The present state of affair is some vested interest are managing to forcefully coerce countries in the region to behave....................now the worry is should Iran become nuclear powered the stakes will be different.In order to avoid that scenerio,every possible means are being kept ready to deny Iran.How far the countries will succeed in doing so, you await DR of Florida to apprise you soon

Why do they need them is a better question? Before this, no one threatened them. If they give this up, no one will threaten them. While I understand your issue of fairness, I don't understand the Why of the matter. First, nuclear energy is not safe nor clean, it is undisposable, so instead of worrying about greenhouse gases we can add radiation to that list. Secondly, other countries torture inmates. Should we be allowed then? Canada has no nuclear weapons. And we are doing great, very prosperous, and well liked. It is irresponible to want something just cause someone else has it too. Sounds childish, will it benefit the Iranian civilians? How about leading the way in other areas of life, Smog control, have you seen Tehran? Green energy. Solar energy, space exploration. Promote civilian livlihood. This whole issue has to do with pride, and the innocent civilians shouldn't care one way or another, no one would attack them, Can they eat that nuclear weapon? Can they use it as collateral for a mortgage or loan? Your mentality is that of a kindergarten. Be a leader and not a sheep.

Good idea, Tom, just let a terrorist nation who is constantly threatening other nations and trying to rally other unfriendly nations against the U.S. have nukes. What was I thinking? Why not? Let him have nukes. chem and bio weapons as well. Listen tom, I dont care if it's "fair" to not allow them to have these weapons, It is unsafe for the rest of us. stupid lib.

B"H Iran has set expectations for something big. With the quantities of uranium processed, enrichment is not necessary for an ordinary nuclear explosion. So big must be bigger than that. If there is something that was actually achieved of the nature that the expectations are being set at, it is at the level of a demonstration of Iranian nuclear capabilities. We shall have to see what that demonstration is. However, if it is a nuclear weapons test, we shall no that the world did nothing serious even though it was warned about this situation, and it sort of aquiessed to it with some half-measures with no effective response. However, if we see that Iran accidentally blows itself up on that date, many will shed tears for the people of Iran who had gotten oblitterated by a maniac at their helm. I am surprised that the Iranians are not protesting more seriously about the current events.

Add this this that Blair. your Eurowimp, gives the Iran yet another signal to continue to prepare its ruthless jihad for world conquest thru WMD.

The problem is semantical. A U.S. or U.K. defense dept. develops contingency plans for many different places and many different situations. 10's of thousands of these have never been used. If the members of the government open up the situation room, sit down and begins using a contingency plan, then it is a real "plan". Blair says no real plan.