Add talkback 
Print talkbacks 
Iran hints will develop nuke if attacked    News agencies
31. mahmood, YOU CAN'T SUPPORT IRAN IN LONDON
THE MULLAH NEEDS YOU. GO BACK!!!
NT Atilla ,   Tel Aviv   (06.25.08)
32. Chosen World - Onward Goyim (sic) Soldiers
No one has to die. People like you simply have to get used to the idea that other people have the same right as you to exist in peace as you do. Israel has withdrawn from 97% of the land it won in 1967 and is at peace with Jordan and Egypt. The problem is of course that the Palestinians want too much. They are like children - everything or nothing at all. The Mullahs of Iran seek their own demise by threatening Israel. How absolutely bizarre.
jerry ,   New York, USA   (06.25.08)
33. REALITY IS TO COME,CYNTHIA.....#26
Unlike you stating that the time has come to face reality.Keep on board and observe how the EU members start leaving Bush's company in the very immediate future.USA's policies have left these companions with rapid declining trust.Keep track of events......and that also,very closely
MAHMOOD ,   LONDON-UK   (06.25.08)
34. 10
Mahmood If the US carried out airstrikes against Iran it wouldnt be just the neuclear sites it strikes The Iranian navy would be destroyed while its shipes are docked just like Pearl Harbour. The Iranian would suffer very heavy damage Its missle program would be put back years Its neuclear program would be history Iran will suffer alot of humiliation if the US caried out airstrikes. Alone Israel may not be able to do the kind of damage the US can but anything Israel sucseeds in doing however big or small would be a huge humiliation to Iran, after all Ahmadinijads threats and tough talk and Israel still attacked and caused some damage. When the arabs lost the wars in 1948. 1967 and 1973 it wasnt the loss of territory that got to them it was the humiliation of defeat. The arabs didnt need that land back but they wanted it to help get over the humiliation. The hardest thing for Ahmadinjad to get over would be the humiliation of the attack. The more we humiliate the arabs and persians the better Israel will be .. when they are down you kick them harder to teach them not to mess with you again if they dont want more of the same.
zionist forever   (06.26.08)
35. As well as destroying Irans neuclear program
Lets get rid of the Egyptian Baradei who has been nothing but bad news for Israel and has taken the side of the Persians but as they are both muslims and both hate Israel its not a surprise really. The jewish states enemy is my friend
zionist forever   (06.26.08)
36. If the jews needed Nukes to stare down the Arabs surely
if it is OK for the world to acknowledge that there are some 150 Nukes in Israel and that this has been confirmed by Olmert and President Jimmy Carter. Surely then Ahmadinejad as a founding member of the NPT has a right to be allowed his Nukes to stare down the combined threat of the US and Israel! "What is good for the Goose is good for the Gander"
lydia ,   Brisbane   (06.26.08)
37. 12,26, Iran is a member of the NPT Israel is not!
Iran under the Shah and with the help of the US and Israel had embarked on building nuclear facilities. When the Mullahs came into power however they stopped all nuclear activities. That Ahmadinejad has breathed new life again into Iran's nuclear facilities does in no way obliterate/diminish Iran's inalienable rights under the NPT. You mightn't like Ahmadinejad but you are playing Chess with those who invented the game. Talk Peace!
lydia ,   Brisbane   (06.26.08)
38. To #30 Jake
Jake, what do you recommend? Any ideas on how Israel can survive an attack from an Iran armed with nukes? I swear there are no good options but to do nothing is only putting off the inevitable until it's worst. I agree with you about the worthless Olmert, he is Israel's Jimmy Carter and maybe even worst. I feel strongly that America should be right by Israel's side if this rumored attack goes down. Israel should not have to go it alone. I am a true friend of Israel and I can't completely comprehend how the Persians could hate the Jewish people that have contributed so much to our planet. Just like you, I really would like to see peace on earth.
Not Jewish ,   USA   (06.26.08)
39. #33 Shortsighted Mahmood
This supersedes Bush and the EU. There is no doubt in anyone's mind about the global danger of a non-cooperative and threatening nuclear Iran. For all we know, countries may already be aligned with specific assignments associated with a strike. And as zionist forever points out, the humiliation of a successful strike comparable, but not identical, to Iraq in 1981 would be devastating to the Regime and their quest for Pan-Arab/Muslim leadership and expansion. History is a sequence of events.
Cynthia ,   USA   (06.26.08)
40. IRAN SHOULD GET 150 NUKES!
Israel should give Iran all 150 nukes it got. 1 to each large city & industrial area. Let ayatolahs glow in the dark like lightbulbs. Should Iran want even more nukes, US should give it some too. That will make Iran perfectly nuclear power.
Rosi Nolan ,   NY, USA   (06.26.08)
41. iran not developing nukes unless attacked
"Larijani did not specifically say Iran might build a weapon if attacked, but his vague comment was the first hint at a threat it might do so." Yes and Iran isn't doing this now...duh. Has everyone fallen off the turnip truck!!!! Diplomacy will NOT work against Iran. They have stated as much. So bombing their nuclear facilites is a must.
patricko ,   Sequim, USA   (06.26.08)
 Previous talkbacks
Add talkback 
Print talkbacks