It is funny to see the madness of the Shiite entity fake regime who still believe they can get away with all their crimes, and their defy of the world order. Sarkozy was too kind to warn them. There should no more warning toward the enemy. They will see very soon with arain of iron what they despicable attitude will earn them in return

Israeli experts say that Iran could go nuclear as early as 2009. This is precisely the same year in which Ahmadinejad is reported to have said the hidden Imam will reappear. It is also possible that Israeli estimates are off by a year—or more. Perhaps Iran will have a nuclear bomb next year, or at least the unimpeded capacity build one. No one really knows. Meanwhile, European diplomacy has failed miserably. Discussions have yielded almost nothing and Iran has never been closer to acquiring nuclear weapons. More at : http://xrl.us/okrky

You say that there is no other choice that deny nuclear bombs in Iran. Then,what will you do? Do you will strike Iran or not,yet? when?

Much less......a nuclear facility still standing. Iran has totally bucked up in the estimation game. The United States is going to take out their facilities and military. You can take that one to the bank.

Its funny, because your question is like an old jewish saying: If I am not for myself, who will be for me? And if not now, when? the answer is so clear, isn't it?

Iran rejects warning of an Israeli strike.IRAB IS RIGHT The cowardly corrupt Israeli leadership will do no such action.Iran knows that the Americans are tied to two serenas of war and do not want to enter another conflict.France is giving warning to be in the style of to much talking and no action.

Confused ? the truth hurts isn't boy ? despite your wishes, the fake Iranian regime is by now a dead man walking. It is doomed to fail, and their barkings and theeats will not deter anyone. capice ?

TEHILLIM 83 (PSALMS 83) IF THEY ARE WISE

Two scenarios, with most likely outcomes outlined. 1) Israel strikes Iran with conventional ordnance, thereby denying them the capability of producing uranium bombs. The conflict ends with Israeli forces withdrawing after a short and successful campaign. Iran is forced to restructure their programs. Israel is condemned by the rest of the world. End result: The military conflict itself is contained, except for intifada which only kills local Israelis and terrorists. Scenario two: Iran completes enrichment goals, and refines enough U235 for several devices. The devices are loaded onto Shahab 3 missiles, which are detonated over Israel at an altitude of 10km, destroying the entire technological infrastructure. Israeli has only one available response option. MRBMs with 5kt yield are detonated across Iran. Russia or China responds militarily due to their economic and energy interests in the region. Or perhaps Pakistan retaliates on behalf of Islam. At minimum Russia deploys forces by sea, air and land, claiming it is necessary to stabilize and prevent escalation. --Partially true. US responds by attempting to disable invading forces with EMP and electronic attack. The US response is interpreted as a nuclear attack, -- partially true; resulting in Russian SLBM attacks on US mainland, and deployment of HEMP orbitals. This results in ICBM or second-strike SLBM retaliation, and the inevitable response by everyone else. End result: The END. Therefore the only option for the world is for Israel to destroy Iran. We will be blamed for all the evil in the world, or else we stand by and let Iran begin a process that leads us inevitably into apocalypse.

IDF may strike in a very unconventional manner...I suspect that an indirect strike at Iran's economic jugular, will be the preferred route vs an attempt directly on the diversifiied nuclear infrastructure; unless of course Israel is prepared to use tactical nuclear bunker busters up front...which I doubt.

Anyone not familiar with Iran's 30 year long calls for the destruction of Israel might just conclude that Israel simply wants to be the sole nuclear power in the Middle East. Every report on the Iranian nuclear program must refer to Iran's demands for Israel's destruction. Israel cannot afford a nuclear--armed Iran always threatening Israel's survival. Every Western nation should be threatening Iran with force if it does not dismantle its nuclear reactor, Iran must not be allowed to have any nuclear program.. Russia its nuclear technology and weapons supplier should be ousted from the G8 for enabling Iranian nuclear threats to Israel.

since the facts that Iran's nuclear program is legal, subject to IAEA"s constant inspections, and the fact that Iran does NOT have nukes have completely bypassed you, let me remind you it is Iran and its population which are under threat by the Zionista. Zionists started threatening Iran with military attacks way before Ahmadinejad came on the scene. The Western nations will not threaten Iran with "military force" as you wish because they need Iran more than people like you with low IQs can realize.

Israel has already kicked butt on most in the region more than once. When they were being attacked first. I wouldn't bet on it persian cat a wallin

Neither Israel not it's master USA has the balls to attack Iran. Unless they become totally suicidal, in which case Iran will welcome the chance to help them get over it all.