|
31. Advice for Hillary Clinton
There is no point telling Israel what to do. It should be the other way around. Pressure the Islamist-Jihadists to release Shallit and to stop crusading their Jihadism/Terrorism on Israel and other countries around the world.
|
|
|
32. To: No. 29
| Sarah , |
New York City, USA |
|
(03.04.09) |
That, sir -- or madame -- has nothing to do with it.
Gilad Shalit is OURS. We WILL bring him home.
If you cannot (or do not) understand this, then I am sorry for you,
I assure you that it resonates with all Israelis. You would need to be Jewish to understand this.
If you are not Jewish --- well, hey .... nobody's perfect.
|
|
|
33. sarah...' your comments
your comments are what makes your "group" seem racist. thus 'anti-semitism" remember it is YOU that is talking for all 'jews' as a collective...so when people accuse all "jews' for their actions as a group, remember who started it. 'jews' ....so abe foxman and his gang of bullies trying to silence dissent when people speak against 'jews as a group' need only to follow and read this typical .... 'jewish' and 'you're not' ...comments.
|
|
|
34. EGYPT HAS A BORDER WITH GAZA! ASK THEM TO OPEN BORDERS!
| DONT OPEN ISRAELI , |
BORDERS! |
|
(03.04.09) |
|
|
|
35. Clintons know these Zionist liars only too well
| Chanalau, Tova , |
London, UK |
|
(03.04.09) |
I can sympathise with Hillary having to put up with these hypocrites kissing her one minute and doing all they can to sabotage her efforts the next. What she has to do is deduct $10m per day from the US aid packages till Israel complies.
|
|
|
36. I understand your Comments very well Sarah in NY
and of course I understand the solution to such attitudes.
|
|
|
37. Open borders
| Serge , |
Antwerp, Belgium |
|
(03.04.09) |
Open borders, free passage of goods and persons are a privilege of friendly states. Hamas is shooting every day rockets at Israel. No need to open borders.
Besides when supplies are delivered to Gaza they shoot at the drivers.
Don't put Israelis at risk.
|
|
|
38. #33 from "US"'s reasoning, if I may...
Just to extrapolate then, If Sarah "speaks for all Jews" (which she decidedly DOES NOT), then, using the same reasoning skills as you have demonstrated in your remarks, shall we assume that:
A) Pedophile Catholic priests speak for all Catholics?
B) Al Qaeda speaks for all Muslims?
C) Hillary Clinton speaks for all Americans?
D) John Hagee speaks for all Evangelical Christians?
p.s. I am extremely heartened by the fact that #33 "US" does not speak for all US citizens. I can ASSURE you that Sarah speaks for NOBODY BUT HERSELF, and she certainly doesn't speak for ME. You must be quite obtuse to believe otherwise.
| |
