Backed the Khemer Rouge: 1-2.5million dead Backed the hutu regime in Rwanda: 1 million dead Rescued the DPRK in 1994: 2 million dead and a rogue regime with nukes. Backed Amin in Uganda: only a few hundred thousand dead. If Carter really honestly wanted to help people, he'd stick a gun in his mouth and pull the trigger. PS Palestinians seeking peace includes leaders of Hamas? Nuff said.

None. Carter, the West and Liberal Jews keep pushing Israel to make concessions to the Arabs in the hope they will accept a Jewish Israel. The Arabs don't want to. Carter and the like are just useful tools for the Arabs getting concessions from the West without giving up anything. There is no scenario in which Arabs are prepared to accept a Jewish Israel. Arabs got used to having Israel and the West Bank under Muslim Arab control while Jews were exiled and want that control back.

Carter a long history of a men who surrendured to the arab world ! we can remeber that the american embassy in teheran where US staff was held hostages by the Islamist terrorist in 1981 was the consequences of Carter misjudgement about the collapse of the shah regime

"All 22 Arab countries have offered diplomatic recognition and full trade and commerce if Israel will withdraw from occupied territories," Carter the brilliant man..... So Palestine will be #23. Does he really think or does any educated thinking intelligent person think or brlieve that 23 arab countries will accept ONE Jewish country in their midst. Come on; get real; how long will they let Israel last. They do not even want a Pal State because it will only give Israel "more ligitimacy" as they see it. They will neve agree to this. Read their history & rhetoric!!!!!

mr Carter should pay attention to his christian scriptures since even Yehoshua Ben Joseph the Jew aka Jesus was born there .

Feel free MR.Carter to give up the good fight.You have lived a long happy life ,now please feel free to stop breathing and do the world a huge favour.

Why, thank you for the compliment. I am an uber-Zionist and quite proud of it! You, on the other hand, are an unwanted, illegal interloper on Israeli land. You'll have to leave. Willingly or any other way. Truth must hurt, Nour. I guess that is the reason that Palestinians have preferred to live trapped in a delusional lie for so long. It certainly hasn't helped the Palestinians all that much, but ..... as you so aptly pointed out, the truth does hurt. Guess that explains all the pathetic bleating and whining and moaning to which the Palestinians have subjected the world. Well, far be it from me to keep the Palestinian people from making themselves the world's uber-pathetic laughingstock.

You claim that Arabs are semites. I suggest you read the bible. The claim to the land by Arabs comes from their claiming they are descendents of Abraham through his son Ishmael. However, Ismael was the son of the Egyptian Hagar, a Hamite. And the bible goes on to say that after Abraham banished them, Hagar got Ishmael an Egyptian wife, another Hamite. So the claim that they are entitled to the land becomes a claim by hamites, not semites. Stop trying to steal our heritage.

If Jews continue presence in the West bank over centuries and hold documents of ownership of land; then why it's the right of the the settlers alone to build on UNCLAIMED land. An Israeli advocacy group has found that 39 percent of the land used by Jewish settlements in the West Bank is private Palestinian property, which the organization contends is a violation of international and Israeli law guaranteeing property rights in the occupied territories. The Settlement Watch project of Peace Now also disclosed that much of the land that Israeli officials have said would remain part of the Jewish state under any final peace agreement is private Palestinian property. That includes some of the large settlement blocs inside the barrier that Israel is building to separate Israelis from the Palestinian population in the West Bank. The report states that 86 percent of Maale Adumim on Jerusalem's eastern edge sits on private Palestinian land. A little more than 35 percent of the settlement of Ariel, which cuts deep into the northern West Bank, is also on private property. Israel's government has long maintained that the settlements, developed in large part with public money, sit on untitled property known as "state land" or on property of unclear legal status. Israeli courts have ruled that unauthorized outposts erected on private Palestinian property must be razed, although those orders are rarely carried out. How can the occupier use its legal system to impose legality on ownership of disputed land (by the occupier’s admission), let alone occupied territory? The settlement enterprise has, since its inception, ignored Israeli law and undermined not only the collective property rights of the Palestinians as a people, but also the private property rights of individual Palestinian landowners. The settlements occupy a total of 15,271 acres of private Palestinian land.

israel 2009.... only apartheid and discrimination. today dear Jimmy obama and his friend bibi' (THE SUPER SETTLERS HERO)....will do a recital... A DRAMA. with palestinian partnership... original palestinian can't accept peace arguments by israeli settlers.... impossible call of peace while settlers of israel are building illegal bantustan in west bank!!!!! shame all of you

More crap from Nour... I'm surprised you havent exploded yourself yet? :-)

The operative term being "ex-Cabinet minister." Care to guess why? Moreover, your ignorance is showing. Anti-semite has one meaning, and one meaning only --- and it has nothing to do with Arabs. Arabs descend from an illegitemate, disinherited son of a patriarch. The birthright belongs to the Jews. It always has.

Love your talkbacks. Keep up the good fight.

Every time Jews are criticized here in France, they shout holocaust this, anti-semitisme there, etc. Just to let you know that French people fully support Palestinians in their quest to independence free from israel occupation and settlements! The De Gaulle legacy lives on!

There is no point for you to talk about the virgin and Jo the carpenter regarding Carter. The fact is an AntiSemite is NOT a true Christian. A person claiming to be a Christian and does not know the GOD of Israel is NOT a true Christian. Jesus has a message for people like Carter. He says, " Not everyone who says to Me, Lord, Lord, shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will (GOD'S Ten Commandments) of My Father in heaven (the GOD of Israel)...And then I will declare to them, I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness." Matthew 7:21-23. Carter has bowed to the Islamist-Jihadist world led by Satan in crusading their Jihadism on Israel. This an offense to the GOD of Israel.

The Bible (which even Xtians and Muslims believe in) and archealogical finds prove that this is a Jewish country. JC himself was Jewish (everyone agrees on this, right?) and was born and lived here, so that's also proof that this is and was a Jewish country. So how can Mr. Carter who himself was a Sunday School Bible teacher say that the Land belongs to the Muslims? He's contradicting himself.

The worst president of USA, a Saudi paid operative, a racist, an anti Semite, demented kaker farted and you publish it?

"French people fully support Palestinians ..." That's fantastic, please come to Gaza and stand in front of the qassam launchers with your white flag, while we shoot rockets at the jews. Hamas needs new white flag wavers to shield their brave terrorists (the former ones are with their virgins now), and being french, who could be more qualified than you?

The lands obtained by conquest and deceit in the mid 19th century from MEXICO must be returned by the U.S. occupiers IMMEDIATELY! California, Texas, 'New' Mexico, Arizona, Wyoming and all the rest are to booty of Wars of Conquest a mere 160 years ago. They must be vacated and returned at once (with reparations). I'm sure Mr. Carter will be eager to lead the wagon trains out. Thanks for showing us the truth, Jimmy.

Observer - your argument is a complete wash because it ignores two very fundamental things.... 1) Settlements are NOT against Geneva Convention as they do not displace people already living there, nor do they result in transfer of people out of the West Bank. 2) Based on Intl law, public land that is won through war or transfer is governed by the recipient govt and can be used as they deem fit. That means settlements can be placed on an empty hilltop but not in the center of Nablus. To date, the "private" land claimed by Palestinians was really land claimed by local Pal municipalities as "expansion area" yet not owned by a private individual, thus negating your claimed that it is "private". The Palestinians are NOT a people and thus have NO collective rights to the land. If they did have collective rights to the land, they would have exercised them to some degree under British or Jordanian rule, which they never did. However, if any private Pal land is indeed used for settlements, we'd be happy to cede Umm Al-Faqm in return...a nice Arab city with an existing infrastructure the PA doesn't have to build.