Generally, dialogue is preferable- but not once such a dangerous, discriminatory, and anti-democratic move has been made. It's just like Oslo, where Rabin had to bribe MKs outright to pass the deadly and disasterous Oslo Accords. Like Sharon, who campaigned on a platform against withdrawals and then not only adopted the platform of Labor, which was rejected at the polls, but also went against the overwhelming majority of his own Likud party (which he had vowed to respect) and ethnically cleansed thousands of Jews. Dialogue assumes that the sides operate in good faith for the benefit of all. That's not the case here either.

One must beware of those who talk about the greatness of the rule of law even as their hearts are full of hatred when it comes to the Other. What about the rule of law concerning the tens of thousands of illegal buildings constructed by Bedouin and Arabs in the Galilee, Negev and East Jerusalem? In order to know more about the rights of settlers : http://xrl.us/bj5ng