From the Suras you quoted (if they are real), basically admit that Islam is upset for not being the "chosen people" and having sole access to G-d. And for the rest of time, Islam works to delegitimize Judaism by false libels and stealing holy places, forced conversions and large-scale slaughter, based on Muhammed's teachings. Isn't that basically what Islam is all about...when they indicate that "Muhammed is the last prophet and none other shall come after"? Basically, you claim you are the last word of G-d and any who shall even question it shall be killed....um, because G-d said so.

I find that statement amusing by Yrsa Stenius who DID support the libel Aftonbladet published against Israel where even the "sources" later denied ever making the accusation against Israel. Does she really mean "free speech is to be used when there is no risk that the other side will rage and blow us up"?

It's not up to the columnist Yrsa Stenius what's printed in the paper, i don't really see what she has to do with this. Also, you don't appear to realize that the danish cartoons and the swedish cartoons are not the same. It's a completely different controversy. They didn't print the Jyllands-Posten cartoons, but they did print the swedish cartoon back in 2007. This is the controversy we're currently talking about: http://www.x.se/bf2q

You have proof of that, you are just in denial, and are not able to be honest and say that the organ theft story was a hoax that should have never been published because of dangers it created for Jews from fanatical Muslims because of that.

And what proof is that? A wikipedia article about Yrsa Stenius - who have nothing to do with the matter at all? You're the one in denial. Since you obviously wouldn't take mine or Aftonbladet's word for it, i'll include a link below from The Local that states what i've told you already. I don't care if the organ article was a hoax or not, i'm just saying that you're wrong when you say they didn't publish the cartoon. http://www.x.se/bwsq