Opinion
The moment of decision
Eitan Haber
Published: 23.04.10, 13:57
Comment Comment
Print comment Print comment
Back to article
81 Talkbacks for this article
61. ahmadinejad is not on a safari in africa at the moment...
eporue ,   europe   (04.24.10)
62. #55 the point is the 3rd option is not very realistic
from #43   (04.24.10)
I don't think Ahmanijad wants a bomb to reach a power balance. No one is threatening him, so why the bomb? He wants the bomb so he can use it - either by putting pressure on moderate Arab regimes, Israel or the west with his threats (do what I want or else...) , or to use it to fulfill his wet dream - the destruction of Israel. It's not true that there are other lunatic extreme Islamic leaders who are already in possession of a bomb - name one.. One of the US's biggest nightmare for instance that one of the old USSR's bombs will find its way to the hand of an extremist movement. Why? because like with Ahmanijad, no one wants a reality where this kind of weapon is in the hands of an extremist. All the nations that at present have nuclear capabilities are sane nation no matter what their ideology or faith is. By the look of it, Ahmanijad doesn't play the rules of the game that other leaders play. He killed his own people with ruthlessness, and demonstrated no regard to moral values. Can Israel put the safety of its citizens in the hands of a man who openly declares what he would like to see happen with Israel? Regarding investments in Israel, what I meant the threat to Israel's economy in general. Even the Israelis who will stay here either by choice or lack of options - will they be able to trust that Israel will survive? will they buy houses, start and maintain business, put their money into the economy knowing that their investment is in danger? The economy of a country is a major factor in that country's strength. And again, that's just one thing that could go wrong once Iran gets a bomb.
63. #43 At best,an attack would delay the program for 2 years...
Peter ,   Vienna-Austria   (04.24.10)
Nothing more!! All of that air armada and planning for 2 years??
64. #57- Tom Booze
Archangel ,   Roma   (04.24.10)
Armageddon will prevail whether Israel strikes first or not.
65. #58- If a known leftist like Haber is..
Janice Cohen ,   Jerusalem, Israel   (04.24.10)
writing an article like this, then there just might be something to it.
66. No worries!
john ,   dallas   (04.24.10)
Israel has no intention of striking Iran. They would, of course love for the US to do it for them but thats not going to happen. The fact is tiny Israel is vulnerable to Irans tens of thousands of missles that Israel could not stop. Major targets would be Tel Aviv and Haifa as well as all military bases. Then you have the northern surrogates with all their missles! Hezbollah will stream into a weakened Israel and occupy parts of it requiring Israel to bomb their own citizens to oust the occupiers. Israel will likely be devastated.
67. #60 GET REAL BUDDY
LAWRENCE ,   SAFED ISRAEL   (04.24.10)
Stop bombarding us with your myths,your "G-d on a stick" Jesus sales pitch .Jesus couldn't even help himself,he was nailed to the cross like a twit, let alone help us.GET REAL . I suppose he died for YOUR sins?..the sin of gross stupidity.
68. DON'T FORGET TO MENTION
LAWRENCE ,   SAFED ISRAEL   (04.24.10)
"THE UNSHAKABLE UNBREAKABLE BOND" .....BOND ,JAMES BOND .
69. I don't understand why the Mossad didn't kill Ahmanijad
(04.24.10)
A nuclear is a one man's obsession - Ahmanijad. For the life of me, I don't understand why the Mossad didn't finish him off...
70. iranian opposition
sohnes ,   schlat, germany   (04.24.10)
I don't think toppling the regime would help at all. The majority of the so called Opposition is, as far as i read, not disagreeing with the regime in this particular case. So it would not help much to bring them into power. Moreover, in the chaotic times of change, a theft of nuclear materials would be far easier, since the decisive positions to keep up law and order would be vacant due to some murderous revolution who swept away those ppl. Neither option is a bed of roses, but a regime-change could just result in unedifying, unnecessary consequences, if ya ask me.
71. TALKBACK NUMBER 60.
Arn. ,   SWEDEN.   (04.24.10)
YOU ERR IN UNDERSTANDING. THE JEWS IN THE TIME OF JESUS, EXPECTED THE MESSIAH AS A WARRIOR KING, BUT GOT A PRINCE OF PEACE/THE SACRIFICING LAMB - NOW - THEY EXPECT A PRINCE OF PEACE/A LAMB, BUT, WILL GET A WARRIOR KING INSTEAD, THUS - HERE HE COMES - Zechariah 14 1Behold, the day of the LORD cometh, and thy spoil shall be divided in the midst of thee. 2For I will gather all nations against Jerusalem to battle; and the city shall be taken, and the houses rifled, and the women ravished. And half of the city shall go forth into captivity, and the residue of the people shall not be cut off from the city. 3Then shall the LORD go forth and fight against those nations, as when He fought in the day of battle. 4And His feet shall stand in that day upon the Mount of Olives, Zechariah 12 9And it shall come to pass in that day that I will seek to destroy all the nations that come against Jerusalem. 10And I will pour upon the house of David and upon the inhabitants of Jerusalem the spirit of grace and of supplication; and they shall look upon Me whom they have pierced, THE PRINCE OF PEACE/THE SACRIFICED LAMB and they shall mourn for Him as one mourneth for his only son, and shall be in bitterness for Him as one who is in bitterness for his firstborn. Malaki 4 5"Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the LORD. 6And he shall turn the heart of the fathers to the children, and the heart of the children to their fathers, lest I come and smite the land with a curse. WAR IS COMING THAT IS - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWSATpx7uzk Arn.
72. #60 TO THE RELIGIOUS NUT
LAWRENCE ,   SAFED ISRAEL   (04.24.10)
Save your preaching buddy .I hate missionaries and came to live in Israel in the JEWISH state to live with JEWISH people. I don't believe in your messaianic crap nor need no king .This article is about Israel and Iranian nuclear intention .Leave your "son fg G-d " tripe out of it.
73. #28 What about the 4th option?
Soeren ,   Cologne/Germany   (04.24.10)
Israel attacks the Iranian nuclear installations – and Iran won't strike back heavily? Until now the Iranians did attack Israel only by their proxies – Hizballah and Hamas... I don't know what would happen – but I remember that Hamas also had a big basket full of bloody promises – for the case should Israel ever enter the strip. Often – but not always – dictatorships are much weaker than they appear...
74. # 62 You "think" so and thousands of people shall die
Albrecht ,   P.O.   (04.24.10)
You claim no one is threatening Ahmadinejad. And what about Israel? All know Israel is planning to strike Iran. This articel is about this option and you argue "no one is threatening him"? You want to kill thousands of people for that, what you "think" will be in the future? You describe how the people in Israel will "feel" if Ahmadinejad will have the bomb, you complain the people will not "invest" in Israel and you even "think" Ahmadinejad will use the bomb. How can you see the future? And no no one is telling something about the thousands of people in Iran which can die for such pipe dream? What about it, how will they "fell"? Sorry but this kind of "seeing" the future sounds too familiar. Thousands and millions of people were killed for such nightmares of some people scared to death by their own pipe dream.
75. #34 another scenario
Israel Israeli ,   Tel Aviv   (04.24.10)
Iran gets the bomb, subjugates the Arabs and becomes an empire equal to the Americans, Europeans and Russians. Iran has no reason to attack Israel and lose its new-found wealth. And considering that the Jews and Persians have historically always been allies, the Persians could ally with Israel and bring prosperity to all people of the Middle-East and not just a few American allied-Arabs like now. And one more point: with Judea and Samaria, Israel can survive an Iranian attack.
76. #74: oh please..... Israel only threatened to attack Iran
as response   (04.24.10)
Come on... get serious. Did Israel ever threatened anybody unless threatened herself? Get the order of things straight. It's only after Ahmanijad declared on every stage that Israel should be destroyed and only after he started the process of getting a bomb that Israel started thinking about attacking Iran. Who's the aggressor here? get your facts right and get real!
77. $75: "Iran has no reason to attack Israel"?
how about Jihad?   (04.24.10)
You guys are killing me. Ahmanijad is not the Shah who was Israel's ally. He is a fanatic Islamic. To him the jews are infidels and Israel is "the zionist entity" which he doesn't recognize as legitimate, and which he wants to see destroyed. How exactly can we be allies with the Iranian regime?! Your comment is totally unrealistic.
78. #67: Lawrence
Curtis ,   USA   (04.25.10)
The Passover lambs in the Exodus from Egypt couldn't help themselves, but they had a tremendous role to fulfill !
79. Attacking Iran is like mowing the lawn
Yitzhak ,   Holon   (04.25.10)
The lawn (Iran's nuclear program) will just grow back, as Israel does not have the capacity for the kind of sustained campaign against Iranian nuclear sites that is needed to stop the Iranian nuclear program. Meanwhile,Israel will be politically isolated while having suffered devastating missile attacks from Iran, Syria and Hezbollah. The price of oil will shoot up to $300 - $500 per barrel and Israel will be blamed. A lot to lose and far too little to gain.
80. #77 think
Israel Israeli ,   Tel Aviv   (04.25.10)
Even if he really is crazy and not just putting on a show like Gaddafi or Chavez, Ahmadinejad is not an absolute ruler who says something and everyone obeys. There are ten of Ayatollas, Ministers, Generals and businessmen who have families and interests. An Iranian attack on Israel would lead to an Israeli counterattack on Iran where many would die and the economy would be destroyed. Obama would use it is an excuse to destroy Iran for the Saudis. On the other hand as long as they Iranians do not attack Israel they have a chance to build an empire, subjugate the Arabs, humiliate the Americans and make lots of money. Don't believe the propaganda that all the Ayatollas want is to eat olives.
81. decision or responce
munayya   (04.26.10)
this morning i raed about mr.bush book ...secision points or planes sure he had no decisions but responses and israil have only responses ...decision is a big word for bush and fore israil
Previous talkbacks
Back to article