Words can kill, we all know that. We have seen what words can do throughtout world history. It is about time that Israel stood up to its enemies and said this is not allowed.

Chomsky is counted among the 'self-hating' Jews, who gains power through his platform of pandering to the enemies of Israel, to those that would destroy Israel. His intellectual rationalizations are all self righteous hateful and misguided. Unfortunately the irreligious leaders of Israel cannot lead, yet they are Israel's "leaders'. Israel must remove ALL of Islam from it's borders, as they failed to do with Amalek, and continue to repel self hating Jews such as the notorious Chomsky.

He did not come here to stir up peace, rather, his concept of peace is anarchy. Let him preach his beliefs in Bolivia, they might appreciate him, we don't!!

find your observation to be right on the mark. thank you!

Only when it comes to brow beating Israel do you seem to think one has the supreme right to "freedom of speah". sorry but everything good has limits.

Because then let's have, no, let's REQUIRE the KKK to attend services in a black church in Harlem. Let's demand that child molesters work in schools.

He has no connection to Israel. He is payed by NIFund and Saudi Arabia. Let him go and give a speach there. He is peace now guy. Chomsky/Beilin/Sarid live from Saudi Money. Another war -- more money from the Saudi king.

home. Why should Israel be a sucker? Chomsky and his likes are free to say whatever he wants and that is freedom. Israel is free to allow/disallow in to anyone she wants and that is freedom too. I believe the author is terribly misguided.

He just cannot come to Israel.

You are welcome to disprove what Beck is saying (use red phone line if necessary). Oh, and I do not recall him ever talking about Chomsky either.

and can recognize a quisling when i see and hear one.

Chomsky was/is a Stalinist tool. His opposition to Israel in any form other then that dictated by Palestinian revanchists is well documented. Why give him the benefit of the doubt on any matter considering his history.

chomsky is a die-hard anti- israel, slef defacating jew whose only raison- d'etre is to bash israel at any levle and in every arena. why should israel give him a paltform form witihn its borders to sustain more tongue lashing from chomsky? in the name of "democracy"? that's in sane! keep the chomskys of the world away from us as possible. he can go and spew his venom elsewhere. tfu on him too!

FOR THE AUTHOR: I NEVER SAW SUCH CONVOLUTED THINKING IN MY LIFE! KEEP ON, MAYBE YOU CAN CONVINCE ME THAT WHITE IS REALLY BLACK!

Freedom of speech applies only to a country's citizen and legal inhabitants. A sovreign nation can decide to declare whom ever it deems to be non grata. The above article is a bunch of leftist clattrap and bullshit disguised in legalese jargon smokescreen which the leftists are supperb at creating.

So I am spitting on you at every possible and impossible opportunity and when I come to your door, you say I cannot enter? Who is the stupid one here?

Other readers have done an admirable job dissecting this piece. Jews who undermine Israel's very existence should not be welcome in Israel. This would include everyone from Richard Goldstone to Norman Finkelstein to Noam Chomsky. These Jews have made their choice in life. They have chosen to side with those who are dedicated to Israel's annihilation. Why should these Jews be welcome in Israel?

I have no truck for Chomsky's political views, but it's weird to (temporarily) obstruct the entry of a person who, as a Jew, is entitled to Israel citizenship for the asking.

As if there is democracy and open debate in any Arab country. Noam Chomsky is just another self-hating Jew who gets media attention. Drek.

What kind of country fears the words of an 82 year old man? A intolerant and morally bankrupt one.

The first line of defense is that a democracy should not limit the free flow of ideas. Putting that aside lets note that Chomsky is against boycotts, suports a 2 state solution, has lived in Israel during the 50's and continues to say in interviews that America aside Israel is the only country he could see himself living in. So who to the left of ehud Barak would you talk to> Chomsky just happens to be an anarchist who has bad things to say about all governments.

Totalitarian regimes do fear ideas - they oppress them.

So, anyone whose views disagree with Israeli policies must be suppressed. Apparently moral cowardice and intellectual dishonesty are two concepts which run deep within Israel and her apologists. If you can't make a coherent, logical argument against Chomsky's positions, I guess it would be wiser to outlaw his very presence.

When the eminent Professor Plaut cites Wikipedia as a source, his academic credentials become dubious. Professor Chomsky's academic renown, whatever his political sins, is not based on quotes from Wikipedia,