News
Palestinians: Netanyahu to accept understandings reached by Olmert
Ali Waked
Published: 13.09.10, 00:51
Comment Comment
Print comment Print comment
Back to article
7 Talkbacks for this article
1. Disinformation
Steve Benassi ,   Silver Bay, MN USA   (09.13.10)
2. The Land belong to Israel!
~~Lengualima~~ ,   USAGBFR   (09.13.10)
If the Palestine's Mandate in 1919 sets in their articles 2,4,6,7 that his power is for the creation of a Jewish's Home, and his article 5, prohibits "all ceded or leased of this territory" to Britain as power that had received the Mandato, is not clear that all the territories of the old Ottoman Palestine was assigned to an Jewish's Home. Israel (26,000km2) more Jordania (92,300Km2) today. If in the Mandate do not talk about the creation of other state or Home, only for the Jews, is necessary to be a genious?, to deduce that all the territory of the Mandate was to be part of the Jewish's Home, If we go to use the resolutions of the ONU, I agree with, We must begin with the Mandate: Commission, Peel, woodhead , Londres, resolution 181 and other. If the territory of the Ottoman Palestine was 118,300km2 more the territory the Golan High delivered to Syria by Britain, and the today extension of Israel is 20,000km2, who stole, who has territory that does not belong.?
3. Either there's a freeze or there isn't
Steven ,   San Francisco   (09.13.10)
A partial freeze is still a freeze and a violation of Jewish rights and a contradiction of Jewish history. Netanyahu needs to be removed as a fraud and a second Olmert. Is there anyone in a leadership position in Israel who is not ashamed of being Jewish?
4. Again Bibi Lies and Caves In
Ralph Levy ,   USA   (09.13.10)
Again Bibi Lies and Caves In http://ralphsrant1.blogspot.com
5. If the talks break down...
Michael Davison ,   Ra'anana, Israel   (09.13.10)
It should be over the real core issues: acceptance of Israel as a Jewish state and a declaration on the end of hostilities once an agreement is signed. First, if the Palestinians want to be recognized as an Apartheid Arab/Muslim [Judenrein] state, which they've already declared more than once, they'll have to return a quid pro quo and recognize Israel as a Jewish state. Second, if hostilities don't officially ceast with the signing of a peace agreement, what's the point of signing the afreement in the first place? The Palestinian refusal on this point indicates that they still believe they can implement the "Plased Plan" for Israel's destruction. A formal declaration of the cessation of hostilities and the end of the so-called "Palestinian-Israel Conflict" is a basic and logical necessity for any peace agreement--otherwise it's nothing more than a temporary truce.
6. How about that?
Mike L ,   Tel Aviv, Israel   (09.13.10)
Look at that. For once the Israelis dont back down, and the Palestinians actually respond positively. How about we stop appeasing and do what is right for us for once.
7. building
colin   (09.13.10)
Who gives a damn for the supposed talks. Israel must BUILD WITHOUT STOPPAGES. The pioneers in Yehuda and Shomron are the future of a strong Israel No groveling wimp like Bibi can stop the building.
Back to article