News
Quartet tries new Israeli-Palestinian peace bid
Associated Press
Published: 25.02.11, 07:48
Comment Comment
Print comment Print comment
Back to article
36 Talkbacks for this article
31. Flogging a dead horse.
Lee ,   Manchester UK   (02.25.11)
all they are trying to do is drive the Jews out of the middle causing another diaspora. Israel with 'friends' like American under obama you don't need any enemies. Look at how they threw Mubarak under the bus. The obama administration endanger not only Israel and the west but more so the US. I hope the good people of the us the next chance they get throw obama under the bus. Every other nation who has won land through wars have been left in peace, but Israel who has had to fight wars in self defense and won land through it - are used as scapegoats. Israel is singled out by everybody and it is WRONG.
32. 2 state solution?
ed ,   reno, america   (02.25.11)
so what if the supposed two state solution wont be there forever. it is no solution anyway it is just a step toward Israels demise. the quartet does not have Israels interest, all their proposals benefit the islamic and palestinian factions. none of their ideas benefit Israels security just their death. if i were an Israeli i would tell the quartet to stop wasting Israels time with lies and one sided proposals, pro palestinian and islam!
33. Don't waste time..."palestine"...
Yossu ,   Canada   (02.25.11)
will never, ever, come into existence, except on Facebook or Twitter.. some are willing to die the ultimate death to prevent this invention called "palestine" from ever becoming a reality beyond a mythical place, like Disney...trust me, people are ready to die and cause an earthquake to prevent another holocaust...
34. UN Security Council Resolution, 242, on the basis of which
JBI ,   Israel   (02.25.11)
all peace talks have been conducted, does not call for the establishment of an additional state in the region, nor does it even mention concepts such as "Palestine", "Palestinians" or a "Palestinian state". Any move in that direction has been purely Israel's good will gesture, one that so far has only been reciprocated with knifing, bullets, explosives and rockets all directed at the civilian population of Israel. Since this is the case, why should Israel lower its guards even further and place its civilian population in harm's way?
35. Muslim countries showed their instability and
carlos ,   San Diego U.S.A.   (02.25.11)
unreliability. What is so different from Fatah and Hamas, so the quartet is willing to go on.? ANY AGREEMENT SIGNED WITH THOSE COUNTRIES AND THE PALESTINIANS is not worth the paper it is written on.
36. to nr. 6.
globalist ,   planet earth   (02.26.11)
enough is enough with the zionists, all occupiers, islam, the roman catholic church, criminals and dictators/tyrants/despotes. go to jordan yourself! it is not up to you and your ersatz opinion what will happen to the parties who are involved in the conflict about the land between the river and the sea. it is up to the parties themselves, perhaps to the un (as a mediator) and to international/global law. i have read mark twain"s- the innocents abroad. i have also read the book of lucas catherine-gaza. 2 different opinions. so iam curious of who is right.
Previous talkbacks
Back to article