Rivkah, we all know you are a whack job. You do not have to keep on proving it.

Aisha was already engaged to a non Muslim man named Jober Ibn Al-Moteam Ibn Oday. Aisha's father, Abu Baker Al Siddeek, broke her engagement with Jober is because he was a non-Muslim. Back then, the people of Mecca did not object to Aisha's engagement to Jober because she was physically big enough and tall enough to be considered for marriage. Aisha was 14 YO before Hijrah (migration) to Medina. Mohammed practically married her, 4 years later, at the age of 18 years. Her parents saw that and they engaged her to Jober. Nobody 1400 years ago from his tribe had objected to his marriage? Not even the Pagans of Mecca, nor the Jews of Medina ever objected (they would have very much grasped that opportunity) to it or used it as a point against Islam as anti-Islamic do today.

That's your story and you're sticking with it, eh? Aisha was six years old when she married your prophet; some accounts claim the "marriage" was consummated then; others protest and insist that the "marriage" was consummated when she was nine. Like I said -- we have a word for that, and it isn't "marriage." Helluva thing, to cling to a "religion" founded by a pedophile.

Yes, that's why I put the word "religion" in quotes whenever I refer to Islam. It is not a religion; it's more of a cult. A freakishly primitive and backward cult. There is very little, if anything, about Islam that might lead one to think it is a "religion."

Talmud: Jesus was executed by a proper rabbinical court for idolatry, inciting other Jews to idolatry, and contempt of rabbinical authority.

Rabbi Soloveitchik's credentials are all predicated upon his mastery of the Talmud. Other studies are clearly secondary.