So far all that has happened is that an old woman gave a letter to the UN office. The PLO came out and said that only the PLO, not the PA, can go for statehood. No one knows if the PA is going for an upgrade or statehood. They may be afraid that Congress will cut off their funds; furthermore, the EU is going to bail out Italy and after that will be short on money. Wait and see what happens.

He's chances aren't without the negative aen't much bettet Failing to vote negative would be the last nail needed for his coffin American economy stinks as does their Unemployment situation

The vast majority of American's, per Gallup Polls favor Israel, 67% yea, the remainder nay Obama isn't doing this for love, just an attempt to save his own sorry ass come next November Obama is his own best friend, mos of the world is laughing at his failures, among which are Unemployment which has increased under him, and all his plans that wasted oodles of money, accomplishing nothing Now, do yourself a favor, return to your place on the Pharmacy rack, where the other dozens that are pending sale also hang—Say Hello to your Buddies Ramses & Trojan enz

For the past 3 years Obama encouraged the Palestinians through his demands on Israel to freeze housing construction and to retreat to the 1967 lines - and by fomenting revolutions in the neighboring countries of Egypt and Syria. Obama let the Pal state "genie" out of the bottle - and now (to help him retain Jewish voters/donors for 2012) he is trying to come off like Israel's savior with these last minute promises to use the US veto at the Security Council. Thanks to his anti-Israel policies, the General Assembly will vote in favor of the Palestinians. Then, the entire Muslim world will be on fire, pushing to make it a reality.

It is certain that if that is your choice, the US will go along as it did with Gaza. The resulting aftermath would be your choice too. Anarchy, Iran funding, IDF call up to run everything as in the 60s-98. Those are your options. And you can pay for all of them, just as the US did in Iraq. The choice would be entirely yours.

The GA can't create a new state, the UN Charter doesn't provide for it “The General Assembly does not have the authority to create binding law by a simple vote. It is not a global legislature, just as the UN is not a world government. Its resolutions are symbolic. Never mind the fact that the UN charter never gives the General Assembly such authority” The General Assembly does not have the authority to create binding law by a simple vote. It is not a global legislature, just as the UN is not a world government. Its resolutions are symbolic. Never mind the fact that the UN charter never gives the General Assembly such authority. Just think about it: Does anybody believe that in creating the UN, sovereign states like the U.S. and the Soviet Union handed over their own sovereign authority to a body in which tyrannical regimes and democratic ones, friends and allies, get an equal vote? That if, one day, the General Assembly decides to grant independence to Quebec, or Minnesota, or the Confederacy, that suddenly it will be binding on all member states, including Canada and the U.S.?

Of course Kurds voted for AKP. AKP has jailed all the military brass who used to fight the PKK. AKP is slowly but surely creating the foundation of dividing Turkey into a Turkish state in teh west and Kurdish in the east. After all PKK and their spiritual leader in Pennsylvania Fethullah Glen and his guide Said -i Nursi are all Kurt.

yes ... he said the blind can hit but i say no even the target is blind also without mind also / eyes must have a clear vision to the one to hit and to the other to escape