News
Legal opinion: No obligation to raze outposts
Moran Azulay
Published: 06.12.11, 23:45
Comment Comment
Print comment Print comment
Back to article
6 Talkbacks for this article
1. "I'm gonna make him an offer he can't refuse"
Steve Benassi ,   Silver Bay, MN USA   (12.07.11)
So its OK to steal land if you can convince the owners its OK to steal their land.
2. correct
fad egypt   (12.07.11)
why in israel if a person built a house on a private land he can compensate the owner of the house instead of demolishing while in judea and samaria the demolition is the solution to the problem this is discrimination against the residents of judea and samaria although they are law abiding citizens and they are loyal to the state of israel but it is the leftist elite who is running israel is the problem shalom
3. Reality check time
Gee ,   Zikron Yaakov   (12.07.11)
Since the Knesset has not extended Israeli law to Judea and Samaria the courts have no authority to give any orders whatsoever on the matter.
4. Oneness:SECURE BIG ISRAEL only practical option left.
Jerry ,   The Netherlands   (12.07.11)
5. Damage Already Done
Reid ,   Washington,USA   (12.07.11)
Why didn't this opinion carry weight when the legal owners (Palestinians) asked for their property NOT to be damaged and destroyed?
6. Even H.C.Andersen didn't write anything about "Palestinians"
tom ,   tel aviv   (12.07.11)
and he KNEW fantasy and fable (wouldn't you agree)? So first, please do produce a piece of evidence(a bone splinter, a shred of cloth...) pointing to the existence of these fabled Creatures inhabiting (since ancient times) the Land of Israel and calling themselves "Palestinians"; then we can procede with finding out who stole what from whom. Until then, dear antisemitic bloggers: forever hold your peace and SHUT THE F... UP !!!
Back to article