News
'All Iranian facilities are vulnerable'
Ynet
Published: 02.02.12, 13:52
Comment Comment
Print comment Print comment
Back to article
36 Talkbacks for this article
1. I LOVE Moshe Ya`alon...really !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Chris Rettenmoser ,   Bayerisch Gmain Germ   (02.02.12)
2. Well, what are we waiting for?
Sarah B ,   U.S.A. / Israel   (02.02.12)
An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.
3. yalla!
(02.02.12)
4. To No.2, Sarah
Gabe ,   Canada   (02.02.12)
A leader with balls would be of great help.
5. To: Gabe at No. 4
Sarah B ,   U.S.A. / Israel   (02.02.12)
I do not think that Netanyahu is the problem. I do, however, think that we need to ease Ehud Barak into retirement. I wouldn't mind seeing Lieberman appointed in his place.
6. @ 4
dan ,   tlv   (02.02.12)
# 2 got no balls but hot air talks
7. THESE ARE FOR LOCAL CONSUMPTION........#2
MAHMOOD ,   LONDON-UK   (02.02.12)
Talks and statements made for local consumption to keep people like you busy in responding to talk-backs
8. Iranophobia campaigne
inja   (02.02.12)
The smeer Iranophobia campaigne by this underdevoloped nation, allways in state of aggression. They themself have atom weapon and yet crying like the bunch of babies or bibies. Nobody in the ME likes you, that you know that.
9. Nr 2 and 4.
Arn. ,   Sweden.   (02.02.12)
Nr 2. A waiting for Assad to fall ? NR 4. A Leader with Brains more so ?. May HASHEM be the Leader of the Game. Arn.Sweden,
10. To: No. 7
Sarah B ,   U.S.A. / Israel   (02.02.12)
Ah, yes, of course you would say that. Were STUXNET, DUQU and TILDED also purely for local consumption?
11. I think I will get into this also
Ken ,   Australia   (02.02.12)
I told you I wanted a job pushing buttons, when will it be available.
12. To #7, Mahmood
Gabe ,   Canada   (02.02.12)
Your comments belong to Londonistan also for local consumption. Have a nice day.
13. Hi #1! I agree...but I love all Israelis...
Israeli 2   (02.02.12)
...when necessary they all do a good job in defending Israel. The problem with attacking Iran or any other country is that they never finish the job completely or correctly. They are always held back by world super powers and must stop or withdraw. This should never be an option especially if they plan attacking Iran. This time they MUST restore a new and openly friendly to Israel government
14. WOW!! YOU REMINDED ME.............#10
MAHMOOD ,   LONDON-UK   (02.02.12)
Of course.What happened to them.Your clown says Iran has produced enough uranium for 4 bombs.How could they do it if,according to your prophecy,everything in the Iranian Nuclear facilities is at a standstill?
15. I LEAT REALISED THAT..................#10
MAHMOOD ,   LONDON-UK   (02.02.12)
You are dwelling into these forgotten news.How did Iran manage to accumulate enough uranium to make 4 bombs?Digging into the ground?Your Stuxnet and Duqu is thing of past,Sarah.Forget it?
16. 2
zionist forever   (02.02.12)
Israel does not have the capability to do the job and no matter who was running the country it wouldn't give the IDF the capability to do it. This is not Iraq, Iran has a number of nuclear sites spread around the country underground and their air defenses are very good. Iran is no Libya. Israel would have to use around 100 jets if it was going to hit all those sites and that many planes would be discovered long before they got to Iran. The jets would not be equipped for dog fighting because their racks are all going to be filled with bombs because they can't go reload and come back with new bombs so that means no missiles to shoot down Iranian aircraft. It would be a suicide mission for the pilots and assuming they are successful they will only be able to slow things down because of the lack of capabilities Israel has and in exchange for just slowing down the program we would be bombarded with missiles. A missile barrage and the destruction it would involve might be worth it if the nuclear program was destroyed totally but if we are only talking about 1-2 year setback then its not. Only the Americans with their hardware can do the job.
17. Nr 16. You are totaly wrong !.
Arn. ,   Sweden.   (02.02.12)
You dont seem to know anything about War and Israels War-Machine. If your writing are not for show only, I consider you an Imbecille in regard to understanding Israels Military Capability and howe it could be exersized. Arn.Sweden.
18. To: No. 14
Sarah B ,   U.S.A. / Israel   (02.02.12)
Iran may have ACQUIRED enough uranium for four bombs (strongest candidate would be North Korea; possibly Pakistan). Bushehr and Natanz are non-operational. The IAEA has confirmed that. Now all Iran has to do is acquire delivery capability. That's really the hard part. But why would they even want to? Don't they continually assert that their nuclear program is for peaceful purposes only? Of course, why they would need weapons-grade enrichment if all they want to do is run an electrical grid and produce isotopes for medical use? Can it be -- GASP! -- that Iran's "leadership," in addition to being completely insane, are also pathaological liars?
19. As inevitable as war with Iran may seem I would like
leo ,   usa   (02.02.12)
to offer to wait until after Iranian elections in the Summer of 2013. Hopefully there will be no need for war then. In the mean time West should strengthen sanctions and restrictions on Iran ever more.
20. DOES NOT MAKE SENSE...............#12
MAHMOOD ,   LONDON-UK   (02.02.12)
As Sarah,sitting in USA,picks it up and responds.Local consumption for London??Locally, people are well informed,for your information.
21. 19
zionist forever   (02.02.12)
If the US is willing to take military action ( the only ones who can pull it off ) then I imagine Obama will wait till around December 2012. The election is out of the way so he will either be going into a second term without having to worry about what happens in 2016 or the President Elect waiting to be sworn in will take the fall. Waiting until December also gives the US time to see where the global economy is going and if things have improved the US might be willing to take more chances By summer 2013 it will probably be to late, December 2012 may even be to late but military action is the only viable option.
22. To: No. 20
Sarah B ,   U.S.A. / Israel   (02.02.12)
First of all, why are you so sure that I am in the United States at the moment? The cowardice, mealy-mouthedness and denial of your heritage (by hiding in London instead of manning the ramparts in Iran) does not extend to me. Aren't you far better served justifying YOUR location than making baseless assumptions about where I might be at any given time?
23. To: Leo at No. 19
Sarah B ,   U.S.A. / Israel   (02.02.12)
In the last elections in Iran, which were rigged, protesters were mowed down by Revolutionary Guardsmen. It would be foolishly optimistic to expect a different outcome.
24. hey hook in the jaw, you get fired from your job?
good luck on your ,   long walk home.   (02.02.12)
25. To: No. 6
Sarah B ,   U.S.A. / Israel   (02.02.12)
I wasn't designed to have balls. You, on the other hand, were -- how shameful that you have none.
26. To: No. 16
Sarah B ,   U.S.A. / Israel   (02.03.12)
They way they did in Iraq, the ongoing disaster that is Afghanistan, Waziristan, Yemen, Pakistan and Libya? Of course you do realize that the Saudis would be delighted to give Israel an air corridor, not to mention refueling access. Don't you?
27. #20 you are telling us you are informed? lol
get a job! ,   or start walking!   (02.02.12)
28. to little hammoodi [MR MAHMOOOD]
UNCLE JOE ,   CONN USA   (02.02.12)
MR mahmood ,what do you think of the great show of arab muslim civility ,tolerance and peas ,during soccer ''greetings'' in port said yesterday .please enlighten us mr mahmoood. however, mr mahmoood, i personally greatly enjoyed the show ,and LOVED the outcome .i do hope it happens ALL THE TIME .just keep on playing soccer . all over the middle east ,egyptian style .thank you hammoodi
29. No oil fields means No money.
Paul ,   perth Australia   (02.03.12)
'All Iranian Oil fields are vulnerable'
30. Mahmoud, why are you so afraid?
(02.03.12)
Next talkbacks
Back to article