News
State motions court to order full, immediate evacuation of Migron
Itamar Fleishman
Published: 28.08.12, 13:27
Comment Comment
Print comment Print comment
Back to article
14 Talkbacks for this article
1. Evil, unconscionable and racist ruling.
Chaim ,   Israel   (08.28.12)
We all know that neither the state nor the High Court would ever contemplate such a ruling if Migron was populated by Arabs, instead of Jews. This is an evil, unconscionable and racist ruling based on nonexistent legal evidence. Moreover, the only reason this abomination is occurring is because Likud reelected Bibi; who is a loyal servant of the extreme left.
2. Law and Order 1 - Illegal settlers 0
Haim ,   TA   (08.28.12)
3. THIS IS A SHAME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Chris Rettenmoser ,   Bayerisch Gmain Germ   (08.28.12)
4. At last! There might be a god after all...
Gregg ,   Haifa IL   (08.28.12)
5. #2
israel israeli ,   tel aviv   (08.28.12)
Do you support the immediate destruction if the illegally built Arab settlements at Susya? If not, why?
6. evacuation?
mohamed ,   palestine   (08.28.12)
This is resettlement
7. Exactly WHO is the " state" in this article?
Angel ,   Israel   (08.28.12)
Name the person (evil anti-semite) responsible for this
8. traitors 1- Patriots 0
trump   (08.28.12)
9. #2 Susya happen to be in Palestine.
(08.28.12)
10. Bibi is a worthless leader
Rachel ,   US   (08.28.12)
11. B"H May Hashem rain HIS justice on the "high" court and let
Bunnie Meyer ,   Los Angeles, CA USA   (08.28.12)
them feel his wrath.
12. #9. A town can't be in a fictional state.
Chaim ,   Israel   (08.28.12)
#9. No town can be in Palestine; for Palestine is fictional. It never existed and never will exist. One may as well claim a city or town in the name of Oz, Neverland, Atlantis or Narnia.
13. Rachel
Rusty ,   U.S.   (08.28.12)
Maybe he fears G-d and not doing the right thing.
14. #9 no
israel israeli ,   tel aviv   (08.28.12)
That is not an answer. "Palestine" is the name the Europeans gave Israel during the Roman occupation, and refers to all of Israel, including Gaza, Judea and Samaria. Susya is in the area designated to be a Jewish homeland and illegally occupied by Jordan between 1948 and 1967. After 1967, Susya was liberated by Israel and found to be uninhabited just like it was for the previous 1800 years. Even under the Jordanian occupation it was considered state land. In the last 20 years, Arabs have illegally built homes there. According to any law (Ottoman, British, Jordanian or Israeli) these houses should be destroyed as they are illegally built on state land. Now that you know that facts I ask again, why are you against destroying the illegal Arab houses at Susya?
Back to article