News  World News
Clinton: US had nothing to do with film that sparked violence
Reuters
Published: 13.09.12, 18:42
Comment Comment
Print comment Print comment
Back to article
55 Talkbacks for this article
31. #29
(09.13.12)
What about Muslims and Leftists who burn the American flag? They are the ones who should be prosecuted for hate crimes.
32. Barrybarry Barry
Jerome ,   Basalt, Colorado   (09.13.12)
Obama said it is not our buisness to get involed with Iran internal affairs when they revolted against crazy mullahs that call U.S. great Satan! Then the 2nd day of Eygpt revolt Bumma say our ally mubarak has to GO! What don' t you understand?!
33. Liberals still brown-nosing enemies. Here da results!!!
American-Israeli Jew ,   Israel   (09.13.12)
Didn't learn from Carter. Similar results.
34. How the US should have handled Mubarak?
Ralph Haglund ,   Lund, Sqweden   (09.13.12)
someone asked above. By asking him slowly to change some of the unnecessary rules of course. Teach the Egyptians to read, only half knows. Teach something sensible in the universites and not only the Koran. Teach them to cultivate the food they need, not only half. I could give many hints.
35. Hillary could have initiated
Ralph Haglund ,   Lund, Sweden   (09.13.12)
a film telling the TRUTH. Much more sensible than just whining over what she does not like. She can start going to YouTube and searching for 'Muslim child brides'.
36. Nov 6, where are you
Nora Tel Aviv   (09.13.12)
A toothless Obama does not mean a toothles US. Obama , would you beleive it, has only SEVEN WEEKS left at the White House.
37. hillary
azad ,   canada   (09.13.12)
monica
38. #29...get with the programme, you are just a bunch
peggy ,   uk   (09.13.12)
of spoilt ignorant morons that still live in the dark ages. You burn others flags, but we wont stoop to such a low and childish level and burn your flags, as offensive as they are to us.
39. Barry #26: Obama is a disaster!
Steve   (09.14.12)
Obama does not control the Arab street but he does control U.S. foreign policy and he's made a disaster out of it by punishing our friends and rewarding our enemies. Mubarak knew his days were numbered and he (like many Arab dictators) knows how to control the Arab street so that there might have been a peaceful transition to a non-extremist replacement. But President Barack Hussein Obama would have none of that. He wanted Muslim Brotherhood extremists, otherwise why has he been schmoozing them? This isn't rocket science Barry. These leaders in the Arab world know the Arab street. But Obama did not support Mubarak or any rational transition. As far as Libya is concerned, not every Republican is a fool like John McCain, Marco Rubio and others. According to news reports, Congressman Allen West was wary of U.S. intervention in Libya for fear that the revolution there would bring anti-American extremists to power. “I don’t know who those guys are,” West said at the time. Do you think Barry?
40. we do not consider it freedom of expression
sam ,   denver-USA   (09.13.12)
The speech in religions should be a red line and not be under the freedom of because we must respect the feelings of these people because different cultures and customs, for many of the crimes and the massacres were committed against innocent people because of beliefs and religions,so should be trial and punished anyone who harms any religion and we do not consider it freedom of expression
41. # 36
Birdi ,   Israel   (09.13.12)
US elections are on 7th November, not 6th.
42. To #29
graczek ,   Maryland, USA   (09.14.12)
You are quite correct. These days there are sharp limits to freedom of speech. Some cite the US Constitution, but it is an 18th century document with little relevance to conditions in the 21st century. The filmmaker must be vigorously prosecuted.
43. Great hairdo on the Secretary of State.
Rivkah   (09.14.12)
44. #29
Henry from New York ,   Under the Tuscan Sun   (09.14.12)
A hate crime constitutes an act of violence or intimidation against an individual in a protected group. A film cannot be a hate crime and to start ruling films as such would be a dangerous path to take.
45. #40
Henry from New York ,   Under the Tuscan Sun   (09.14.12)
Incredibly dangerous idea. It would allow for censorship that could easily get out of hand. We must never go down such a path.
46. She Spoke Correctly
TSB ,   Clifton NJ USA   (09.14.12)
I rarely agree with her, but for once she got it right. The film was made by two obscure jerks. The US govt has nothing to do with it -- except that it allows freedom of speech. That part she vigorously defended. That is the price you pay for vigorous an open debate -- sometimes the idiots say something stupid. Nevertheless, we don't censor them. Congrats to Madame Secretary for saying so forcefully.
47. Yes, the vid is made in Israel
Paco ,   Canada   (09.14.12)
no surprise
48. @40 burning books... then heretics...
Miron ,   USA   (09.14.12)
Who needs America to lead us back in medieval darkness?
49. Mendlhson's removal from Carnegie scheduled for Monday...
Miron ,   USA   (09.14.12)
50. Could U Imagine if the World Reacted This Way Towards Muslim
EZ ,   US/Israel   (09.14.12)
What if the world began to hold muslims accountable for their horrible depictions of non-muslims (which they do all the time) and rioted and went after muslims in the streets? It would be a complete and total disaster for muslims: they wouldn't ever recover from such a series of events. But they would most certainly stop being so easily offended by such nonsense. I think the majority of the world is becoming openly belligerent against Islam and soon the powder keg will burst. I wouldn't want to be a muslim when it does (which almost certainly will happen). Every single day, all we've been reading about for decades is muslim terrorism. If it continues this way, people are gonna pop. And it won't be a nice sight. Muslims in the ME had better wake up and knock it off before this happens. Its gotten very tiresome and offensive to the point of enticing the worst in people to come out.
51. #29: NO, ITS NOT A HATE CRIME; ITS THE 1ST AMENDMENT
EZ ,   US/Israel   (09.14.12)
In the US you are totally allowed to use 'hate speech'; as deplorable as it is, it is 100% legal. The film is 'hate speech' NOT a hate crime. "Fighting words" can be prosecuted if spoken in a threatening way and in a continuous fashion but NEVER hate speech. Its never been and never will be prosecuted in the US. The First Amendment allows it 100%. Go learn the Law of the land: its all right there.
52. #22 Michael
DavidR ,   USA   (09.14.12)
You've really got it bad for Hillary huh Michael? Give it up, she still loveeees Bill.
53. #42 interesting idea
Old Guy ,   tel aviv   (09.14.12)
What about Monty Python? Should they be vigorously prosecuted for "Life of Brian" where they mocked Christianity and Judaism? Or is prosecution only for those who insult the religion of peace?
54. #42 I agree he should be proscuted for
jossie murdoch ,   rep of eire   (09.14.12)
making such a lousy load of rubbish. I have seen this movie, and even though it seems they are trying to get over a message, the messenger feel by the wayside. We all saw Life of Brian, Jesus Christ Superstar, but didnt go on a blood letting rampage.....I wonder why, could it be that some folks are more civilized, while some do show that this terrible movie did have some truth.
55. 8-The way she talks, the more the lunatics will burn.
Ypip ,   Canada   (09.14.12)
Let's face it, with her and Obama on the chair...they'll be having a hay day.
Previous talkbacks
Back to article