News  World News
France: Iran seems on track for nukes by mid-2013
Associated Press
Published: 21.10.12, 17:29
Comment Comment
Print comment Print comment
Back to article
21 Talkbacks for this article
1. Iran on track for mid-2013?
Noodles ,   Coney Island   (10.21.12)
Somebody's going to have to untrack them, aren't they? The old added time goal gets them every time.
2. SOUNDS LIKE.. ................
MAHMOOD ,   LONDON-UK   (10.21.12)
Festival dates being set...............oh!! Once again,we are drawing nearer to thetime when the 5+1 meeting is set and so do these articles appearing once again. Why 2013.Why not end of 2012?
3. G-d's Algorithm
Adam Neira ,   Paris, France   (10.21.12)
There are many calenders in the world...Jewish 5773; Christian/Gregorian 2012; Islamic 1433; Iranian Nuclear Enrichment Red Line Soon ??? The divine timetable will trump all others. I repeat...There is an optimal, peaceful solution to the Iran/West imbroglio. Google scientists recently discovered that a Rubik's Cube no matter how diabolical its configuration can always be solved in 20 moves if the right algorithm is in place. They call this the "G-d Algorithm".
4. Netanyahu & Barak useless fellows
Dan Goldman   (10.21.12)
Netanyahu & Barak now at each others throats over courting Obama's favor. What the buffoons have been saying for so long that "Israel would be responsible for its own security" ? Now the master has said "NO...throw Israel's security under the bus..my elections are more important", and they are grovelling like two lap-dogs in front of Obama.
5. WHO WANTS TO BET???
les ,   canada   (10.21.12)
although i am no betting man, but would bet the ayatollahs will fire the first nuke, knowing full well that persia, the "islamist entity" will vanish from the face of the earth....anyone?
6. Nuclear Iran
Harold ,   USA   (10.21.12)
We've been listening to this brocken record for the last two to three years. I remember the Ayatolah once said "we don't have the bomb at present but if it is needed we will have it"
7. Only Romney cant stop them
David ,   USA   (10.21.12)
Israel from what I Read just does not have the capability to stop them. The Democrats will not do anything because they are weak liberal fools. Hope that Romney wins the election. Basically for all you ISraelis who are following the key state is Ohio.
8. Yeeaaahhh...talk till the mouth breaks...
Chris Rettenmoser ,   Bayerisch Gmain Germ   (10.21.12)
9. Rubbish!
Sarah B ,   U.S.A. / Israel   (10.21.12)
Like I have said before Iran's facilities are NEVER coming on line. It will take years for Iran to even assess the extent of the damage caused by Stuxnet. As promised, by Israel, Iran's nuclear program has been stopped dead in it's tracks. Also I am reliably informed that all of Iran's computer-driven systems have been seriously compromised and even PERMANENTLY crippled so don't mind these silly reports that Iran will have nuclear weapons.
10. Shy Israel will want to uselessly bomb hardened
Bunnie Meyer ,   Los Angeles, CA USA   (10.21.12)
underground sites that could only stop them for a short while and then Russians would give them SS400 anti-aircraft/anti-missile system and there would never again be a chance to stop them. If you just destroy their population centers, there will be no one to build any nukes or cause any kind of problems, just a defeated, glowing pile of sand.
11. re: sarah # 9
stan ,   montreal   (10.21.12)
Sarah: Thank goodness that you have reliable sources. Now we can all rest.
12. the choice the Iranian bomb or no Iranian bomb
Galut ia ,   Selah   (10.21.12)
Will the Nevile Chamberlains of our time ... declare "peace in our time " only to find the world exploding around them? the choice is now on the table ! choose wisely !
13. Iranian nuclear bomb timescale
David Thomson ,   Scotland   (10.21.12)
In 1984 Janes Defence magazine reported that Iran would have an atomic bomb within 2 years.In 1992 none other than Benjamin Netanyahu stated that Iran would have a nuclear bomb within 3 to 5 years.
14. #13
Galut ia ,   Selah   (10.21.12)
whether its 6 months or 6 years - an atomic bomb in the hands of radical jihadist should never be allowed to happen ... Iran has been on the front lines in terms of the idea of eliminating Israel ...and would like controlling interest among Islamic states... there are several passages in the book of books that indicate that horrific weapons will be used in the time of the end.... that does not mean we should stand by an let it happen but events may happen inspite of what we say or do...the book of books just records those events as future events that will happen.
15. ...and Mr. Obama is still appeasing...!!
Jehudah Ben-Israel ,   Qatzrin, Israel   (10.22.12)
16. Atom bomb means suicide. Nobody smart would want atom bomb.
Michael ,   California, USA   (10.22.12)
17. #9
Mussie ,   West bank   (10.22.12)
"reliably informed" !!!!! You are the new Head of the Mossad?? Don't be so pompeous in your statements - be humble, it wont hurt you. You Miss "Iknowitall"
18. Only military intervention will stop Iran's nuclear jihad
Chaim Ben Kahan ,   Efrat, Israel   (10.22.12)
No one wants war, but the Iranian regime is forcing the hand of the world to act. When the world does act they will do so with extreme force. Iran threatens oil shipments in the gulf, American soldiers, the Gulf region and the Israeli people. Iran is also endangering their own populace. When NATO strikes they will strike hard and civilians will be harmed and the Iranian military annihilated. Iran will respond by murdering innocents and this may lead to the use of incredible force against Iran, and in the end it will be the fault of the Iranian regime.
19. #9 If you believe Iran....
Robert ,   Australia   (10.23.12)
.....will NEVER have nuclear weapons your ardent wish to nuke Iran shows you up as a bloodthirsty warmonger. Your glee at the murders of Iranian scientists by Israel only goes to back that up. You are therefore not entitled to criticise anyone. You are as offensive as those you criticise.
20. #19 What an odd jump to conclusions.
Jake   (10.24.12)
I don't see any of your conclusions even hinted at in #9's post. I think ya are hallucinating.
21. #16 Like the Americans in 1945?
Jake   (10.24.12)
Back to article