Add talkback 
Print talkbacks 
At Arab village, Shas is met with enthusiasm    Goel Beno
1. The difference between National Religious and Religious ...
...."in black" is that ,seemingly,the "religious in black" have the same mindset of Naturei Karta.All of them. Dangerously,Bibi is alligned with "religious in black" and that´s not good news for Israel. The Rebbe Lubavitch wore black,but that was not his mindset ,as long as I know... Well,I don´t like this" lobbied"way of thinking of them and I am pretty sure the National Religious sector is the best for Israel ,even because they DO go to the army to defend the asses of "religious in black" while the opposite is not true.
Keren ,   IL-BR   (01.03.13)
2. #1 Shas are a Zionist party and part of the WZO
Akiva   (01.03.13)
3. Shas helped inflict Oslo Disaster on Israel.
Shas helped inflict the Oslo Disaster and many other tragedies on Israel. I have long believed that Jewish patriots should avoid Shas like the plague. Shas is not worth a single patriotic vote or shekel of support. This article makes my conviction even stronger.
Chaim ,   Israel   (01.03.13)
4. #3
Many Arab, Bedouin, Circassian and Druze citizens are more loyal and Zionist than Shas.
(01.03.13)
5. Sha"s is not worthy
I have more respect for some minorities in Israel than I have for Sha"s - a party that would do anything, including selling their poor moroccan grandmothers for a little bit of power and influence.
Abu Zib ,   Haifa, IL   (01.03.13)
6. Shas would join a government with Hamas and Hezballa
for the right price.
A ,   Belgium   (01.03.13)
7.  #3
Peres reached an agreement with Jordan in 1988. It was called the London agreement, according which, Israel would have had the right to maintain a light military presence in key areas of the West Bank, like in the Jordan Valley or in the hills of Judea. This agrement was scrapped by Shamir who wanted to keep everything for himself. As a reasult, we found ourselves with the intifada, Jordan renounced its claims in the West Bank and ultimately, Shamir's stupidy dragged us in Madrid with the PLO. Hence, it was the Likud which imposed Oslo upon us. Without irredentists like you, the the king of Jordan would've been the king of the West Bank and Gaza and he would've crushed Hamas the same way as he crushed the PLO in 1970.
A. Assayag   (01.03.13)
8. Judea and Samaria are part of Israel.
#7. Judea and Samaria are part of Israel. Nobody else has any right to Judea and Samaria, except Israel. Judea and Samaria have belonged to Israel for more than 3,500 years. Moreover, as any child capable of reading a map knows, Judea and Samaria make Israel viable.
Chaim ,   Israel   (01.03.13)
Add talkback 
Print talkbacks