News  Mideast News
Susan Rice on Iran: Every reason to be skeptical
Yitzhak Benhorin
Published: 29.09.13, 16:41
Comment Comment
Print comment Print comment
Back to article
16 Talkbacks for this article
1. It is reasonable to assume, that at this stage the Mullahs
tom ,   tel aviv   (09.29.13)
will concentrate solely on the "Little Satan". Americans can continue to sleep well until it'll be their turn...
2. World must focus on WMDs
Norbus ,   JERUSALEM   (09.29.13)
Biological , Chemical , Nuclear , Fundamental Islam , all weapons of mass destruction. Man can control or limit the effect of the first three evil weapons .. The fourth is out of control , with no known antidotes, yet powerful support from the likes of Obama Zawahiri and Khamenei If no cure can be found very soon, the fourth and most virulent WMD will destroy Islam on the way to destroying civilisation as we now know it
3. Excuse me...
(09.29.13)
Even nuclear energy not acceptable just flimsy excuse - Fukushima stopped leaking nuke into the sea yet? So we call for more earthquakes and tornados and etc to expose wickedness of these world leaders that have sold out their souls to hell destruction.
4. Every reason to be skeptical, indeed!! Does Mr. Obama
Jehudah Ben-Israel ,   Qatzrin, Israel   (09.29.13)
understand this? And, have the red lines that he has drawn regarding Iran been wiped off the table, now that he found a "friend" in Tehran...??!!
5. Multi channel mixed messages
Tarbouche ,   Aswan   (09.29.13)
Purely to run with the fox and chase with the hounds
6. Rice is Obama's backpeddler
Dror ,   Haifa, Israel   (09.29.13)
The criminals in control of Amerika need a war. They need a distraction and they need someone to blame for the complete collapse of the monetary system. Rice is ofcourse serving the interests of the usurpers controlling Amerika. Americans have gotten wise and they are getting wiser day by day. The coming war will lead to the collapse of the Dollar, but people will know who is to blame and why it has happened. It won't help many of them that will be at the mercy of the government.
7. #1 Tom, no need to worry too much
Dror ,   Haifa, Israel   (09.29.13)
Obama is an agent of the Saudi Royal family. The Saudis need to weaken the Mullahs at all cost. Obama's man at the UN, Susan Rice is taking the three steps back that Obama cannot publicly take. The "administartion" is desperate for war. All we have to do as wise Jews is STAY THE HELL OUT OF IT. Let them destroy one another. Obama has no problem sacrificing us if we let him, neither does the Saudi Prince Bandar.
8. Jewish blindness and low self worth
Dror ,   Haifa, Israel   (09.29.13)
It is common knowledge that Jews have allowed themselves to feel inferior over the centuries due to the hatred and envy of the goyim. Jews have been affected. To this day many Jews feel inferior and second rate. Well, it is time this attitude ended once and for all. Study the monetary system of the US. Study the betrayal of 73'. Study the petrodollar recycling system. Everything the Talmud says about this time is absolutely one hundred percent true. Esau will tell the Jews, "I did it all for your benefit" when infact he took care of himself first and foremost and the scheme of world domination was always to his sole benefit as the architect and mastermind of the entire system. Jews, begin to open your eyes.
9. Carefully chosen words?
chris (munich)   (09.29.13)
"Rice said that Obama had carefully chosen his words when he said that Iran had the right to use enriched uranium but not actively enrich uranium itself. " Hard to see what is careful about words which directly contradict the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty: Article IV 1. Nothing in this Treaty shall be interpreted as affecting the inalienable right of all the Parties to the Treaty to develop research, production and use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes without discrimination and in conformity with articles I and II of this Treaty. 2. All the Parties to the Treaty undertake to facilitate, and have the right to participate in, the fullest possible exchange of equipment, materials and scientific and technological information for the peaceful uses of nuclear energy. Parties to the Treaty in a position to do so shall also cooperate in contributing alone or together with other States or international organizations to the further development of the applications of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, especially in the territories of non-nuclear-weapon States Party to the Treaty, with due consideration for the needs of the developing areas of the world.
10. Don't worry, Bibi's coming with his bucket of cold water
Noodles ,   Coney Island   (09.29.13)
11. #3
Joy'is   (09.29.13)
Completely agree with you.
12. Obama started normalisation with Iran
CJK   (09.29.13)
he has already sent back an important piece of antiquity to iran, without iran taking a single step to stop its nuclear weapons program. yet susan rice tells us not to be concerned.
13. I don't see much skepticism
Sarah B ,   U.S.A. / Israel   (09.30.13)
What I see is a dumb American administration, and its toadies, foaming at the mouth and tripping all over themselves to achieve rapprochement with an Iranian government that has not changed a single whit since 1979. Obama really needs to be impeached. Eliminated. He is the most dangerous thing that has ever happened to the United States.
14. #13
chris (munich)   (09.30.13)
Nice to see that people like you are worried - maybe something positive is happening after all! It's been a long time.
15. 14, chris, nothing positive is hapenning
CJK   (09.30.13)
I cannot think of a single positive thing that is happening under the obama administration. the Washington times is reporting that some schools are attempting to brainwash children with pro-obama material. some parents said it it feels like 1940. the school board apologised, but this is not the first time this has happened.
16. #15 - nothing positive?
chris (munich)   (10.01.13)
Admittedly it is hard to present in an entirely positive way, but would not recognition of the limitations of US military power, rather than smashing up further countries, be a step in the right direction? Surely this is preferable to policies which seem to be leading inexorably towards an apocalyptic world war? Your obvious answer would be that the world war will come with the Iranian atom bomb. It remains to be decided whether this is a realistic appraisal of the situation, or just more of Condoleezza's mushroom clouds.
Back to article