News
IAEA nixes report that could've angered Iran
Reuters
Published: 27.02.14, 17:32
Comment Comment
Print comment Print comment
Back to article
17 Talkbacks for this article
1. Can someone tell me ....
Sarah B ,   U.S.A. / Israel   (02.27.14)
.... why the perceived need to keep from angering Iran is more important than revealing the truth about their supposedly benign nuclear program? Don't you recognize a sham when you see one? Rouhani is no different than Ahmedinejad -- just less combative. The mal intent hasn't changed; it's just wearing a nice smiling face. Moreover -- the IAEA is supposed to be an impartial finder of fact. If there is reluctance to publish facts, then what conclusion can possibly be drawn other than there is something very deceitful going on with respect to Iran's program?
2. Proves even more that the world powers are cowards.
barbara ,   Haifa Israel   (02.27.14)
3. Israel has to sacrifice 20 million Iranians for peace
Steve Benassi ,   Silver Bay, MN USA   (02.27.14)
4. IAEA is not an objective organisation
CJK   (02.27.14)
the iaea follows the political objectives of the obama regime. this objective is essentially to avoid war at all costs, even if it means that iran will become a nuclear power. it is well known that the iaea gets its intelligence from member states, including in most particular from us intelligence. us intelligence has been most politicised under obama.
5. Iran 1 Israel 0
(02.27.14)
6. IN OTHER WORDS IRAN HAS THE ATOMIC BOMB
stude ham   (02.27.14)
but the UN uselessly stands aside as it always does when it comes to any non-Israel issue.
7. Strike them (Iran) soon ! The
DT ,   TA Israel   (02.27.14)
"axises of the weak" are bogged down by Ukraine, Syria and the "pass" they have given to Russia by their weakness- now or soon is a good time to give the West something to really worry about for which the West is to blame anyhow. Whack Iran good and proper
8. more evidence that neither Obama or the IAEA can be trusted
zionist forever   (02.27.14)
9. Iran has to sacrifice 20 million of their own for nuclear
Steve Benassi ,   Silver Bay, MN USA   (02.27.14)
10. It just goes to show how right bashed Netanyahu is on this
Steve Benassi ,   Silver Bay, MN USA   (02.27.14)
11. #1 - I will tell you
Yeoshua F. ,   N.Y   (02.27.14)
Iran does not plan on producing an atomic bomb. If it did, it would have already made headline news from the dozens of times it´s nuclear facilities have been visited by experts regardless of this report. However, as long as there is a middle eastern country with nuclear capabilities (guess who) who is hostile to Iran and threatens it day in day out, I believe it is entirely in Iran´s right to produce nuclear weapons in order to defend itself. The reason that the usually over-confident and lavish Israeli government is so terrified of Iran with nuclear bombs is that it knows that statistically even if it manages to intercept 4 or 5 bombs, one will hit. And if one hits, it´s all over. Unlike Iran who can take a hit and keep on going. So my recommendation for Israel is : MAKE PEACE and SHUT UP. Don´t pretend to be a superpower because you are clearly NOT.
12. Agree, IAEA and Sotero are two sides of same sheet..
Beary White ,   Norway   (02.27.14)
They cannot be trusted, and they deceives the world with their pro-islamic manoeuvers which makes the world a more dangerous place to be. By hiding the iranian bomb-project, they have made a new meaning to The Nobel Peace Prize!! They have taken Alfred Nobels intentions with his peace-price in the wrong and deadly direction, and mocking the world...what a shame!!!
13. #1, Dear Sarah, the friends of Iran are working
Chris Rettenmoser ,   Bayerisch Gmain Germ   (02.27.14)
overtime, to make the mullahs nuke dreams come through. ONLY a military attack on ALL of their illegal installations will bring them back to reality...
14. #11 Yoshua
David Israel ,   New York, USA   (02.27.14)
It is not Israel that is hostile to Iran. In fact Israel had very good relations with Iran before he Mullahs came to power. It is the Mullah regime in Iran that is hostile to Israel. In fact the previous Iranian president Ahmedinejad many times said it openly and clearly that he would wipe out Israel from the earth / map while the current president is using Taqqiyah to get the embargo lifted so that they can have the bomb that can potentially wipe out Israel.
15. #11 - Get a grip on the facts .. before posting ..
Michael Redbourn ,   Lisbon Portugal   (02.28.14)
I won't go into all your nonsense. But do you think that one nuclear bomb would destroy Israel? And especillay the type that Iran could have in the near future. Try 30 nuclear bombs .and Iran would be totally destroyed before Iran could deliver them. And Iran wants to be able to build a bomb within a few months of deciding to do so. And you're so anti-Israel with such a Jewish name?!
16. #15 Michael Redbourn
Mark Wilson ,   U.S.A.   (03.01.14)
Norman Finkelstein and Noam Chomsky seem to agree with Yeoshua F. of N.Y. They are Jews too aren't they?
17. #11 Yeoshua
Mark Wilson ,   U.S.A.   (03.01.14)
Excellent post...
Back to article