the public DOES NOT have an "interest in free flow of travel" if said public includes a "free flow" of terrorists

Yarzidis and COPTS face certain death and a genocide if they stay in these countries
Just how many of them has the USA accepted?
Other groups are in the midst of a war that they started and do not face certain death in their own countries.
The old left wing president was too busy putting for a birdie to take any notice of what is happening to people from these minority groups.

the court of appeals seems to have embraced the ideology of open borders.
the court ignores the 1952 us law which clearly gives the us president
unfettered discretion to bar foreigners from entering us territory
based on national security considerations.
the court ignored the fact that the seven states that were put on
the ban are either enemy states, or failed and lawless states.

the court's ruling makes it impossible for the executive to ensure that
unwanted foreigners are prohibited from entering sovereign territory.
courts do not have jurisdiction over matters that reach beyond
national borders.
individuals have the right to exit sovereign states, but they have
no right to enter sovereign states unless they are citizens
or permanent residents entitled to citizenship under domestic
laws.

Unlike the previous nightingale in the WO who sang such sweet poetic songs and did nothing, the current dog in the WO bites!!
He might not sound so good - but who cares what is said - what is important is what he does and this dog gets things done !!