1.
Good and balanced approach
Vitaliy
, NJ, USA
(12.14.06)
2.
So, what exactly does international law say on this?
(End)
Suzanne
(12.14.06)
3.
the high court has no buseness in this
haim
, mtl canada
(12.14.06)
4.
isn't she Livini the justice minister .
(End)
(12.14.06)
5.
Unprecedented ! a court's rule to null itself !
observer
(12.14.06)
6.
Israel is a morally bankrupt state
Hebron
(12.14.06)
7.
can it determine in advance; a targeted killing permissible?
(End)
(12.14.06)
8.
court, like IDF, should attend rehabilitation classes
(End)
(12.14.06)
9.
poor little man 6
haim
, mtl canada
(12.14.06)
10.
no surprise
saeed surie
, egypt
(12.14.06)
11.
Innocent civilians?
Monk
, USA
(12.14.06)
12.
#6 Muslim from Hebron
Monk
, USA
(12.14.06)
13.
More BS from court.
sk
, USA
(12.14.06)
14.
The Court had no choice
Uzi
, Haifa
(12.14.06)
15.
Targetted killing is against any norm and human rights
Tayfun_Turkey
, Istanbul
(12.14.06)
16.
#15, Tayfun, you may have a point
Steve
, USA
(12.14.06)
17.
Targeted killings is not the root cause
Uzi
, Haifa
(12.14.06)
18.
targeted killings
charles
, petach tikva
(12.15.06)
19.
High Court: Targeted killing permissible
Stephen E Hughes
, Soda Springs USA
(12.24.06)
