Channels
Photo: Dan Balilty
Elyakim Haetzni
Photo: Dan Balilty

Thoughts on security fence

Security fence must be used as weapon to fight Palestinian enemy

One fence? The country is building three fences. One, very effective, around every community in Judea and Samaria (the West Bank.)

 

These are very effective, with electronic warnings, cameras, buffer zones, readiness brigades.

 

The second is the well-known security fence, built on or near the Green Line, in accordance with American dictates.

 

The third kind, around the "settlement blocs," are meant to calm fears amongst the Likud Party: "Proof" that at least the blocs will remain.

 

This type of fence was planned as part of the separation fence, as a deep breach in the future border, as if to say: "The fate of Ariel, Gush Etzion and Ma'aleh Adumim will be the same as the fate of Tel Aviv."

 

The Americans came along and forced Sharon to build a separation fence west of the blocs, thereby separating them from sovereign Israel. And where? On the Green Line.

 

Now, it is a dream to continue building the second fence, which has lost all political meaning, around the settlement blocs.

 

After all, on one hand Bush revealed the naked spin created by Sharon, called blocs," when pushing him to build the separation fence between the blocs and Israel, and on the other hand the Supreme Court, which ordered a choking, destructive route for the fence.

 

This fence cuts off the settlement blocs, takes away thousands of dunams of state land, and brings a "border" that will invite attacks and prevent self-defense, into close proximity of their homes.

 

Just like Gaza’s Kissufim Route, take two.

  

Those fighting to thwart the "settlement bloc fence" have a good chance of succeeding. It will also choke their Arab neighbors, and they oppose it, and the Americans don't care, because the most meaningful fence from their perspective is being built anyway, along the Green Line.

 

Settlers worried about a fence being built on the Green Line will be told: Don't worry. With no Jewish towns in the territory, the fence has no future, and it will become like the Philadelphi route, which Israel couldn't defend once it destroyed the Jewish towns behind it.

 

As opposed to this, the separation fence is protected on both sides and is supported by massive Jewish settlement over the Green Line, essential to Israel as a weapon against the Palestinian enemy. Because we are at "war", not involved in a "conflict".

 

Terror doesn't strike us, unless terror is a weapon in the hands of our enemies, and we do not need dialogue, but rather an overwhelming victory, until the enemy waves a white flag.

 

In war it is dangerous to mix with the enemy, and therefore we need the separation wall. Even if some terrorists breach it, it will prevent thefts, the cooperation of Israeli Arabs, infiltrators and those hoping to realize the "right of return," and mainly the Palestinians’ cynical economic use of the Jews, who in all their foolishness allow the Palestinians to milk the cow while at the same time sucking its blood.

 

And therefore: If the government finds the strength to use the fence as a weapon in our war against the Palestinian enemy - great. And if not, don't worry. It won't last long. It's just too bad about the money.

 


פרסום ראשון: 10.31.05, 20:50
 new comment
Warning:
This will delete your current comment