Olmert defends ex-bureau chief accused of wiretapping - Israel News, Ynetnews
 
ynetnews
web


   Israel News

Israel News
World News
Israel Opinion
Jewish
Israel Business
Israel Culture
Israel Travel
Corruption

Former PM Olmert Photo: Guy Assayag
Former PM Olmert Photo: Guy Assayag
 
Shula Zaken Photo: Guy Assayag
Shula Zaken Photo: Guy Assayag
 
Moshe Talansky Photo: Gil Yohanan
Moshe Talansky Photo: Gil Yohanan
 
Uri Messer Photo courtesy of Kol Hair
Uri Messer Photo courtesy of Kol Hair
 
 

Olmert defends ex-bureau chief accused of wiretapping

Former prime minister files detailed response to indictment against him, surprisingly addresses count against Shula Zaken. 'It is a groundless, forced accusation which reflects a trend of excessive indictments by State,' he says

Ronen Medzini
Published: 01.04.10, 17:26 / Israel News

In his detailed response to the indictment filed against him, former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert makes a surprising move by supporting his former bureau chief Shula Zaken.

 

Although he himself is not indicted for the wiretapping affair for which Zaken was charged in the framework of a joint indictment against the two, Olmert has addressed her count in his response.

 

On Trial
Olmert denies all charges against him in court / Aviad Glickman
Former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert officially denies all allegations made against him in indictment in Talansky double billing case, Rishontours case, and investment center case. Shula Zaken also denies claims: I have placed my trust in the Holy One
Full story
"There is not doubt in the mind of the defendant that all of the defendant's (Zaken's) actions on that score, whatever they were, were meant to improve and make efficient the bureau's work and to help the defendant's job," the response stated.

 

According to the former prime minister, "This is a groundless and forced accusation which unfortunately reflects a trend of profusion of indictments by the State while incorporating different matters into the indictment and dividing it to minor affairs, all in an effort to broaden the indictment." Zaken's own response to the indictment will be filed later on Monday.

 

Olmert also addressed the three counts for which he is charged together with Zaken which pertain to two corruption affairs – the Cash Envelopes affair involving Moshe Talansky, and the Investment Center affair.

 

After already pleading not guilty in general, Olmert addressed the various counts specifically in his response. He denied the vast majority of counts, and admitted to certain facts which he claimed reflected legitimate conduct on his part. Sources close to Olmert noted that his reference to the Rishon Tours double-billing affair will be given at a later date.

 

In respect to the second count pertaining to the Talansky and Investment Center affairs, Olmert noted that the funds received from the businessman were "expense refunds" for overseas functions in which he appeared, and that all was done in the "customary fashion."

 

Olmert's attorneys claimed that their client regarded his participation in the events organized by Talansky with great importance and with the aim of promoting the ends of Jewish Diaspora bodies, helping them raise funds – "which was routinely done."

 

The former prime minister denied all of the counts which pertained to illegal receipt of funds and stressed that there was "a natural and customary relationship in relation to support of political views of an elected representative." As for actions he allegedly performed for Talansky, Olmert claims that his involvement was "part of his job and didn't go beyond his involvement in other cases." He provided a similar response regarding the Investment Center affair.

 

Olmert further denied all charges in the framework of the third count which pertains to fraudulent conduct with the state comptroller.

 

'Factual discrepancies'

Olmert's communications director Amir Dan addressed the fact that the former prime minister is charged with various offences committed collectively with his attorney and friend Uri Messer, while the case against Messer was closed.

 

"It appears as though two different Prosecutor's Offices, with no connection between them, are behind the decisions in respect to Olmert and Messer. Essential factual discrepancies separate the indictment which was hastily formed based on partial data, from the later decision pertaining to Messer."

 

It should be noted that the State Prosecutor's Office's decision of closing the case against Messer detailed the rationale behind it. According to the explanation, Olmert, as opposed to Messer, was a public figure who was subject to harsher standards.

 

commentcomment   PrintPrint  Send to friendSend to friend   
Tag with Del.icio.us Bookmark to del.icio.us



 
1 Talkbacks for this article    See all talkbacks
Please wait for the talkbacks to load

 

RSS RSS | About | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Terms of use | Advertise with us | Site Map

Site developed by  YIT Advanced Technology Solutions