Another wasted visit from the head of an organisation that is vehemently anti Israel, pro Palestinian and pro Arab. A meeting with the Israeli Prime Minister can be likened to meeting with a staunch Israeli opponent with a Prime Minister who now has the influence and standing of a corpse both at home and internationally.

...they should have secured the release of Shalit by now. This is going to be another Kofi Anna crap !

Reality Check, World

He can visit the moon for all the good it'll do.

See if he can wield any influence in South Korea (and maybe North hehehe!) and approve the construction of a couple of shuls or outreach centers or whatever we can call them. I Love Korea and maybe "just maybe" our presence there at a minimum will add to the quality of the deli's that seem to be popping up and becoming more popular there. If I get really ambitious I might even hope that we dispel this villainous rep we have there amongst the people. After all it really isn't their fault they have been under the tutelage of the Amelicans for the last 60 years or so.

"A United Nations committee has called on Israel to allow Palestinian refugees to return to their property and land in Israel and to ensure that the bodies responsible for distributing property, such as the Jewish National Fund, not discriminate against the Arab population. The UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination made the recommendation in its concluding observations released Friday, in response to a report Israel submitted on the matter." Source: Haaretz Why is Israel being singled out constantly, considering that human rights are being trampled all over the world, particularly in Muslim countries. And what kind of rights do Jews have in Muslim countries, for example?

How can any rational UN administrator come up with the idea that resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict would create a "conducive political atmosphere for the resolution of other issues in the Middle East", such as the civil war in Iraq and the nuclear threat from Iran. Can he explain why should Israel give up land for the sake of creating a "political atmosphere" for the resolution of other countries' conflicts? A UN style "resolution of the Israeli Palestinian conflict" would signify nothing less than a binational state, and a much shrunken Israel at that.

When I see statements like this -- I want to throw up