News
MK: Nuclear bomb won't destroy Israel
Roee Nahmias
Published: 23.10.07, 10:17
Comment Comment
Print comment Print comment
Back to article
26 Talkbacks for this article
1. its nice to know Kadima is planning to lose a nuclear war
aaron ,   ra'anana   (10.23.07)
Can a party leadership which can't even defeat a bunch of guerillas with Katusha rockets be trusted to protect us from an oil rich state with medium range ballistic missiles and nuclear bombs??? [hint: its a rhetorical question]
2. From Inside the radius
Nora ,   Tel Aviv   (10.23.07)
Thank you. I am so releived that only a few thousand Tel Avivians, including me, will have to pay the price. As Israel will only "Retaliate' in such a scenario, Tel Avivians should better become Aradians, and fast.
3. destroying a nation all ! too sick talks
(10.23.07)
the point is right or wrong it is too sick. I feel sorry for childreen who learns hate from adults. The world history has too many bad things. too many. what we talking is real issue. I believe. but still too sick. this is not about Palestine. No. It cant be. Atilla Karagözoğlu
4. No, but it would certainly screw things up for a long time.
JPS ,   Efrat   (10.23.07)
Nobody wants a major portion of Tel Aviv to be closed off for a couple of hundred years until the radioactivity dissipates. We should give Iran credit for being the ruthless, war-loving, infidel-murdering Islamic fanatics that they are.
5. i feel much better now, how about you?
bb ,   jm   (10.23.07)
6. #4 Propaganda
Aharon   (10.23.07)
That's just rubbish propaganda. Iran has the biggest Jewish community in the ME outside of Israel, and has never started an offensive war. That doesn't mean we shouldn't prevent them from getting the bomb, of course.
7. Of course a nuclear Iran can destroy Israel
Daniel Cohen ,   Israel   (10.23.07)
You have to remember that Israel is highly reliant on tourism and immigration. With a nuclear Iran, both will drastically decline. Thus having major consequences on the economy. The governments of both Israel and the international community need to stop trying to pacify the situation and act on Iran. Before it's too late.
8. 500 Meters?!?! Fantasy!!
Avi ,   hilltop, Israel   (10.23.07)
A nuclear bomb will only destroy a 500 meter radius? What fiction is this guy spreading? Even the 1945 (extremely primitive) version destroyed the better part of a major city. This MK is spreading unhealthy fantasy.
9. Has this man lost his mind?
Terry ,   Eilat, Israel   (10.23.07)
This is supposed to be reassuring us? Is he crazy? Only 20-30,000 casualties in the middle of Tel Aviv. Nothing much. Will our economy survive such a hit? Is he comparing our tiny country to Japan with a population of 100 million people? I'm sorry to say, this "expert" has little or no common sense. The idea that we sit & wait & absorb this kind of strike is totally insane. It is equally insane to believe that there is any deterrent value in our retaliatory strike. It is totally irresponsable to say we have time - sure, let's wait until it's too late. This kind of thinking is why we are in the situation we are now in. We have Hezbollah now fully re-armed in the North, Syria preparing for war, & Hamas arming itself to the teeth in Gaza. All of these developments are the result of a lack of strategic planning & the abandonment of the option of preemptive military action. And, at the same time, the lunatics who run this country think that by shrinking our borders, we will have achieved something. If Prof. Ben-Israel believes that Iran will have a bomb in 3-5 years, then that is about how long our country has to survive. What a calming message.
10. A nuclear free or nuclear saturated middle-east ?!
abdullah ,   ashkenaz   (10.23.07)
Those are the two choices. There appears to be no (military) way to stopping the latter (in the long run), nor to change the combative nature of the region. So waht else is new:-).
11. Neither converting to Muslim...
Josh   (10.23.07)
...and ceding our nation will destroy Israel but this is not accpetable regardless. Thanks for the useless information in this article.
12. WHERE
DAVID ,   JUDEA   (10.23.07)
the heck does Ynet find these morons and on top of that just publishes this garbage. If these journalists (hate to call them that) would do a little research about Hiroshima they would have found out that besides the initial impact zone,there is a much larger area that gets destroyed by the schock waves and the aftermath of radio activity over a much larger area. More then 60 years later the survivors of hiroshima are still dying of these radioactivity related diseases. It is appalling that in their undying blindness and irresponsible reporting Ynet has the gutspah to try to deceive the public in this manner. One nuclear device in the center of Israel will pretty much be the end of all of us here. We are all used to the israeli media's misinformation, but this realy is reaching levels of absurdity.
13. That is kinda Naive
ralphsrant1 ,   USA   (10.23.07)
Physically maybe not but take a look at New Orleans and see the possible aftermath of a bomb and how society reacts. http://ralphsrant1.blogspot.com/
14. 500 metres,500 shmeeters.So what if a million Israelis dead
He talks nonsense ,   Alan SA   (10.23.07)
15. How very reassuring !!!!
mr ,   israel   (10.23.07)
16. Strange way to think !!
David ,   Israel   (10.23.07)
1 bomb = 30.000 deads......but I don't think that Iran will launch ONE ONLY BOMB !! How can we know in advance how many bomb will reach us ?? Arrow seems a very good ABM system , but we don't know if it will work at 100% and we don't know if we have enough Arrows to intercept all the missiles they will have within few years. Without these data......it's better to keep on thinking to the Atomic Bomb like a Very Very Dangerous Weapon.
17. MAD = mutually assured destruction
eddie ,   london UK   (10.23.07)
Perhaps ther will be "peace" thur the threat of MAD. It may sound crazy, but it was the case with Russia and the West during the cold war. On the other hand, perhaps Iran will be willing to take a few nukes in order to destroy the israeli state, which is centred in 2 or major cities. Iran couldn't care less to lose 10 -20 million people, it might think it is a price worth paying to get rid of the zionist enemy? So , solution - attack iran now!
18. Prediction is Faulty at Best , Pure Fantasy at Worst
emanon ,   USA   (10.23.07)
Half a kilometer for the main fireball alone, maybe. Still potentialy damaging / dangerous shockwaves would extend far beyond that range. The death toll is based on maybe an *immediate* death toll and does not take into account the deaths by radiation poisoning after the immediate disaster or the slower deaths from cancers developed as a result of living near elevated levels of nuclear waste for many long years. Ask the people of Hiroshima or Nagasaki about this. Ask the people of Chyrnoble when they can safely return to their homes or how many are dying because of a radioactive leak from a reactor. Those levels are nothing compared to what a bomb could deliver.
19. What the hell are you schmuks talking???
Jonas ,   SAD   (10.23.07)
There is no winner or loser in nuclear war - there is only death! If Iran launches, so will Israel, and it will not be one bomb, but ALL of them. Which makes pretty much the nuclear winter on the Globe!
20. oh boy....
Ruben ,   TLV   (10.23.07)
And this idiot is sitting in Knesset? Not enough, he is also a general? We are in trouble, people, with these kind of "experts" no wonder none of us feels secure.
21. so attack syria now!! YES !!!!!!
Petra ,   usa   (10.23.07)
Better to hit them now than they hit Israel later.
22. No, But It Would Make For A Really Bad Day
David ,   Marietta USA   (10.23.07)
Where do you find these imbeciles?
23. The real Meaning
TheTruthHurts!   (10.23.07)
I think what the good man is trying to say is this: The persians dump their crappy bombs on us then israel dumps stuff on them (not saying what :) ) Then the russians get angry and dump their crappy bombs on USA which inturn craps out eveybody else..who dont wanna help the free world! so in fact what we are looking at this THE END OF THE WORLD. Nuclear bomb won't destroy Israel but probably the world :) enjoy while you can!
24. How come the sites in Japan are still not deserted?
Danny ,   America   (10.24.07)
The cities are rebuilt and there isn't any of the effects some fools warn about, at least not now like the 1st year. Nukes end war fast!
25. retaliation
alun ,   london uk   (10.24.07)
i think in any possible nuclear war for example with Syria or Iran Israel should get its retaliation in first so that the other side cannot get a first or second strike in .Very unstable situation but ther is no alternative we have to preclude the possibility of Syrian chemical missiles and Iranian missiles
26. hi
(05.05.08)
so,see wat bugs them. talk
Back to article