They move everything in 2003 to Belaruss in 25 huge cargo just before US entered Iraq. The US even thought that Saddam was with one of the cargo.

reactor in the middle east will be ISRAELI.

Learn how to spell Canada...

In a couple of months, the same images will be used to show Iran's reactors. The way things are going in the world today, those images may also be used to show Gaza reactors.

That's history now! Let's move on...!

i`am sure you will move to history , not by arabs but by the american themselves .

NOW YOU DON'T.........."

You can see the Syrian Nuclear site on google earth : 35°42'28.30''N 39°49'59.4°''E elev 940 ft I am happy it was successfully destroyed... What's next ?

who is , the " mehdi mo'ood" , the " foretold guidance" or the coming one, the waiting mesaiah, as a matter of fact the 12 th generation after the "imam ali", the first imam,

have 4 bombs by now .Since such reactor could produce one bomb/year and then thats it or what?

bombed in 2007, started building in 2001. 2007-2001 = 6 not four and nowhere is it written that it is working at all let alone four years. One more PS 1 year not equal one bomb. Seriously, wouldn't a nice Jihadi website suit you better? One where you can discuss how Jews caused 9/11 without people falling about laughing?

When did Powell show pictures of Iraq's "reactors"? Photoshopping pictures and faking "news" is more an arab expertise

Maybe the US should have invaded Syria instead of Iraq. Oh yeah, Syria doesn't hae oil and didn't insult Bush senior. Anyone who thinks US will bomb or go after Iran militarily is dreaming

For someone in Lebanon you seem too happy to see bombs falling. Are you building Kassams? Honestly, are you really in Lebanon? What kind of Lebanese roots for Israel bombings? Do you like war and death? Better hope the answer to "whats next" is not Lebanon.

#14s numbers appear to be close to the numbers quoted in the ynet article: http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3462993,00.html Assuming it would take several years to get it running and the idea that 3000 cetrifuges running would take a year to make 1 bomb. It is an assumption with some merit. So lay off number #14's post.

opposite faith it makes the marriage easier As for the reactor or if it was it should match the Korean Graphite with 25 to 30 megawatt power it could produce minute ammounts of PU239 plus some other radioactive elments including gold and mercury for dirty bombs or future neutron source the way it was cleansed it means some thing have been produced

it would seem that syria has been the beneficiary of iraq's and north korea's nuclear (weapons) programmes. if this airstrike really destroyed a reactor that was being readied with north korean fuel, what exactly are the syrians or the north koreans going to say? officially, any such reactor cannot exist, since it violates syria's commitment under the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, and north korea has signed a treaty (and accepted huge amounts of money) to shut down its own nuclear programme. there may be more than a coincidental connection to osirak.