Firstly, I don't accept that Israel has committed any wars crimes whatsoever. This is shown by the fact that every single case brought has failed. Every single one with no exception whatsoever. Secondly, the point was that with other countries no one even **tries** to bring law suits. With the lawsuits against Israel they usually fail even the basic tests to get to court because they are based on lies. Like the millions of non-existent cluster bombs in South Lebanon or the white phosphorous that turns out to be smoke munitions. Finally the complaint most people are making is that if you as a person who claims to be interested in human rights where to impartially try to make the world a better place then Israel - and the US - would be far far far far far down your list as opposed to top. The question people ask themselves is why someone like you who claims to be so concerned about human rights and war crimes chooses to start with the [alleged] jay-walker and ignores the mass murderers. Some people claim anti-semiticism but i think people like you and Amnesty are scared of people like Hizbollah - who are perfectly capable of killing people who criticise them as opposed to Israel who at worse will call you nasty names - and because criticising Israel will make you friends down the pub. So you and the others can wallow in your self-righteous but remember we can see you for the cowards you are.

are "sophisticated"?