News
Report: Israel used drones in Sudan
Ynet
Published: 29.03.09, 07:16
Comment Comment
Print comment Print comment
Back to article
15 Talkbacks for this article
1. Probably some Mullas were riding donkeys behind the trucks..
Asher ,   NY,USA   (03.29.09)
2. reads like science fiction!
(03.29.09)
Behold, the long reach of the Sword of Judah! (As always, used only for defending ourselvse from the mad attackers.)
3. Elbit Systems - Thanks : -) Worth it giving you 25 million
ben ,   singapore   (03.29.09)
Elbit Systems' Hermes 450® Records Another Success, Cheers : -)
4. lol from all what happend in
ghostq   (03.29.09)
sudan and the hug problems there and the only thing everyone cares about is Israel blowing some convoyes, funny so funny. for some bribe the sudanees will tell different stories.
5. The range of Hermes 450 and Eitan is too short!
uli ,   Jerusalem   (03.29.09)
The Sunday Times article does not make sense when taking into account official data about the Hermes 450 and about the Eitan/Heron: The Hermes 450 has a range of "just" 200km and the Eitan (although it can be used as a fuel plane) "only" 350km. But The area of the strike is at least 1000km from Israel (when taking into account that the strike was near the southern Egyptian border and the planes took of from the southern Negev, otherwise one can easily get into 1000-1500km). So or there were major changes to the planes and payloads or other planes were used. But the Sunday Times did not even do this simple calculation.
6. h
(03.29.09)
2005*****2008
7. to #5 wow
ghostq   (03.29.09)
quat "The Sunday Times article does not make sense" what an understatment lol it's not the first time.
8. Air strike in Sudan
ZAOUI Roger ,   France   (03.29.09)
Congratulation to Israel Air Force
9. A Message to Iran
Neil Turner ,   Watford, UK   (03.29.09)
This strike, and the subsequent leak to the press, sends a clear message from the IDF to Iran 1. The IDF can strike anywhere, anytime 2. We know what you are doing 3. We have the capability 4. We are practicing for the real job 5. We don't have to risk our pilots As a "member" of the "British IIDF" (Israeli Internet Defence Force), may I congratulate the real IDF on a job well done
10. Thank you, Lord, for UAV's. The cost of captured pilots is
Rivkah   (03.29.09)
too great considering the fate of Ron Arad which is unknown. Simple humanity and rules of prisoner exchange mean nothing to the enemies of the Jews.
11. 5
zionist forever   (03.29.09)
The newspapers love a good theory especially when it involves new technology that the average reader hasn't heard of. It conflicts with what the Sudanese themselves say when they claimed that jets from a foreign power either Israel or the US did it. You can't mistake a UAV for a jet. Its also probable it was carried out by the US based on the information thats coming out of Sudan. The other day they didn't think it was done by Israel and they said that it was probably the US because they control the airspace. The Americans don't want these convoys getting through anymore than Israel does. I imagine that if they got information these convoys were coming they would destroy them and then later tell Israell that they need to take responsibility because they don't want it to look like its abusing their control of the airspace and everybody will suspect Israel anyway. We do you a favour but you keep us out of it oficialy, considering the Pentagon were the first to confirm it was Israel it makes sense. If it had been Israel there would probably be boasts we did it to stop the missiles getting through. All we have had is a speech by Olmert saying Israel has a long arm.
12. #5 brilliant
vashDi ,   israel   (03.29.09)
just brilliant. g-d bless idf, iaf and israel forever someone give me an amen.
13. G-d bless and protect Israel.
petra ,   uSA   (03.29.09)
and kudo's to Israel's master military intelligence.
14. #12
shu ,   london   (03.29.09)
AMEN
15. drones & poison militants: a natural, healthy intersect
Cameron ,   USA   (03.29.09)
A proper reward for those tempting fate. Well done, Israel.
Back to article