News
Court denies Sbarro bomber family's damages claim
Aviad Glickman
Published: 06.04.09, 13:25
Comment Comment
Print comment Print comment
Back to article
10 Talkbacks for this article
1. the nerves of the family
ghostq   (04.06.09)
their son is a mass murderer, they got what they deserve for raising a killer, what about the victimes homes that got ruind, so that would be a constant reminder for what the basterd did.
2. Yawn....go somewhere else....
Andy ,   ramat hasharon   (04.06.09)
Maybe your arab bretheren will reward you. Not here. You got exactly what you deserved.
3. One of our attorneys had to help them
Gee ,   Zikron Yaakov   (04.06.09)
Arrest the lawyer for contempt of court
4. terrorist family demands
Hilda ,   US   (04.06.09)
What's the matter? Didn't you get your 25 thousand dollar bonus for killing Jews? Also your shahid son didnt shower you with goodies from your heaven? or was he too busy with his 72 virgens and forgot you on earth?
5. Shouldn't this family be sued by Israelis?
William ,   Israel   (04.06.09)
For knowingly raising a killer and abetting in his terrorist actions, they are equally liable. Not only should they lose their house and be branded as killers, but equally they should be the target of civil lawsuits by the victim's families.
6. what a chutzpa!
Josie ,   Israel   (04.06.09)
7. Go back home to Egypt, al-Masri family
Joe ,   Ramat Gan   (04.06.09)
Stop "occupying" Jewish land.
8. #7 Yossi - You beat me to it. DEPORT THE FAMILY
meir elazar   (04.06.09)
As Joe (Yossi) stated "Al Masri" means "The Egyptian". This on top of the terrorist act proves that the family are not indigenous to the country but trace their root to Egypt. As such the entire family/Hamullah should be deported to send the strongest of messages and act as a deterant to terror.
9. #8 - meir elazar, There are quite a few...
Joe ,   Ramat Gan   (04.06.09)
There are quite a few Egyptians "occupying" our country- they are the last vestiges of Egypt's colonial efforts in the region during the late 1800's. Common sense would dictate that if a person is going to claim to be "baladi", they would at least change their last name to one that isn't so obviously foreign. It's like when you read about "Palestinian Refugees" living in Syria with the last name Halabi. BTW, until recently, Jews in Arab countries carried the words al-Israili at the end of their patronym (eg, Yusuf ibn Sasson al-Israili). Compare that with the Arab rhetoric of today (blasted from Har haBayit, no less), which claims that a country named "Israil" never existed. It sort of blasts (another) big whole in the whole "Israili occupation" theory, doesn't it? Don't you just love how self-defeating Arab rhetoric is?
10. SCUM
SAM T   (04.07.09)
EXPEL THEM
Back to article