News
Netanyahu: We won't accept another Hamastan
Roni Sofer
Published: 16.04.09, 21:34
Comment Comment
Print comment Print comment
Back to article
51 Talkbacks for this article
1. Wow! That is a perfectly sane stand.
Ken Quinn ,   Amsterdam   (04.16.09)
2. This is Great News!
The 11th Man ,   London   (04.16.09)
3. DECLARATION OF WAR
Nour ,   Palestine   (04.16.09)
4. cas.reader@yahoo.com
cas reader   (04.16.09)
Israelis and the majority of the political parties have voted Netanyahu into Government. In other words, Netanyahu represents the wishes of the majority of Israelis. Their wish is not to have a 2-state solution. No amount of negotiation will change Israel's determination to protect her citizens from terror attacks from the West Bank.
5. Mitchell heard not a single word
Steve from Raleigh   (04.16.09)
He's not there to listen. He's there to dictate terms of the end of Israel. Mitchell's 2-state solution is Gaza and Palestine. Everyone knows that.
6. It is the real policy that every government should follow,
e.m.Jordan is Palest ,   s.f   (04.16.09)
No more terrorists state in state of Israel.
7. # 3
e.m.Jordan is Palest ,   s.f   (04.16.09)
Since the reestablishment of Israel has been many wars and all of those wars Arabs nations has been defeated by IDF, it is very clear to us that with this kind of believes and attitude that Islamic nations has there will be more war, we knows your goal is distraction of Jewish State no matter if we will give you ½ of Jewish State nor entire State but keep dreaming IDF is strong and undefeatable and for us is to be or not be this the only land we had from the beginning and we will keep it for ever.
8. Not another Hamastan? Then remove settlers and IDF stays
Polygraph   (04.16.09)
If security is indeed the reason then only IDF should remain in West Bank; anything else is deception ment to continue the land theft in West Bank by settlers under the umbrella of IDF.
9. To #3
Sapir Ha'Levi ,   Merkaz   (04.16.09)
Declaration of war? What have I missed? Oh, I get it. You cannot recognise Israel, so this "insignificant" clause on the way to peace is too much for a brainwashed society like yourselves to handle. I know it's hard for you not to get anything for free without an agreement like you are so used to, but recognition from both sides can lead to peace, and not from one side. And check out your words, you chant war.
10. #3 - Nour, Bear in mind that it is YOU who is declaring war
Joe ,   Ramat Gan   (04.16.09)
... and what do you think will happen if you lose (again)? You want the "occupation" to end? Stop giving us a reason to "occupy" you...
11. Netanyahu rejects Palestinian Democracy
Nour ,   Palestine   (04.16.09)
Very well we won't accept anything but full "israel" citizenship and voting rights. 2-State solution is as dead as a door nail. Accept the consquences of your settlements and occupation.
12. #3 - on whom, moron?
Andy ,   ramat hasharon   (04.16.09)
13. The 1%ers and leftistists are history
Arie ,   BaGolan   (04.16.09)
FINALLY, the very simply worded demand: NO MORE HAMASSTANS! No more allowing the islamonazis to attack, at will, civilians knowing there will be no retributions; no more free reign for terrorists who believe there is a government in Israel that is not supported by 99% of the citizens as there was with kadima/labour; no more appease, fall in line and surrender. Yes, the Israeli public is prepared to negotiate and live side by side with a pali state - a peaceful state that does not seek our demise. To date, though, both hamass and the plo/fatah have publicly and continuously declared that they never have now rill they ever recognize the Jewish State of Israel. It is time for them to shiite or get off the proverbial pot!
14. AMEN !!!.
ORAO STRANKA. ,   TSARIGRAD u SRBIA.   (04.16.09)
Netanyahu: We won't accept another Hamastan Orao.
15. To: Nour at No. 11
Sarah ,   New York City, USA   (04.17.09)
Or Israel can deport you all. You forgot that one. It's high time all of you became a thorn in someone else's side. Oh, wait -- you did that already, too -- Jordan; Lebanon; Tunisia. So there is experience in packing. Just remember: rolling is better than folding. There is no "occupation." Israel acquired territory while fighting defensive wars. According to the Hague Second and Third Conventions, the acquisition of territories by Israel (1948; 1967) are fully legal. The settlements are therefore fully legal. You need to stop believing your own fanciful rhetoric. It doesn't stand up under scrutiny.
16. thank God no Olmert
Golan ,   SL   (04.17.09)
and no Livni either.
17. #11,Not Israeli citizen ship,
e.m.Jordan is Palest ,   s.f   (04.17.09)
There is 50 Muslims nations or you will move to Jordan it is up to you ,this tiny land has been owned by Jews and will be for ever for the Jews.
18. #7
Marco ,   Spain   (04.16.09)
Wrong! 1973 was a draw, but Lebanon 2000 and Lebanon 2006 were bitter defeats for Israel!
19. To #13, sorry to break it to you Arie
Bobby Goldbergerler ,   Jerusalem   (04.17.09)
But 1%ers is actually the opposite of what you're talking about. 1%ers was used by a somewhat vague, but all too deadly clan of bikers called The Pagans – an American East Coast biker gang that took on the Hell's Angels and ran Pittsburgh, Philly, Long Island and lots of New Jersey up until the early 21st century. Their logic, as it were, was that 99% of society does what they're told - follows the rules, plays nice, etc. but they, the 1% of society that didn't, were set apart from everyone else, so they got cool jackets and rode Harleys and carried battle axe handles. In short, they were outlaws. Also, you live in the Golan and you're cheering on Bibi? Dude, didn't you hear? He's gonna try and give that part away.
20. Mitchell; an Arab-Irish-American
observer   (04.16.09)
Mitchell led an American fact-finding commission initiated under President Bill Clinton in 2000 intended to find solutions for solving the situation in Israel and Palestine. Mitchell's report was published in 2001. It stressed the need for Israel to halt the expansion of its illegal settlements in the occupied Palestinian territories and for the Palestinians to prevent violence. Contrary to Israeli claims, the report found no evidence that the Palestinian Authority had initiated a campaign of violence. When Mitchell confronts Israelis, they are to bring his ethnicity into question.
21. #8 Polygraph. Spelling,oh dear,spelling
Mark ,   Israel   (04.16.09)
Ment (sic) is incorrectly spelt. Get a new spell check. Anyway correcting your spelling will probably be easier than correcting your distorted knowledge of history.
22. What final status talks must result in.
Miriam ,   Jerusalem, Israel   (04.17.09)
The greedy, so-called Palestinian people have claimed that Jews must recognize their right to exist in Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Saudi Arabia and now in historical Israel, while they continue to deny any historical connection between Jews and the Land of Israel. The peace process has been a complete farce all based on false history and devious Arab ulterior motives. The only final status that will bring peace, is the Arab acceptance of Jewish rights to it's historical homeland.
23. Not another Hamastan
Spencer ,   Israel   (04.17.09)
At last we have a Prime minister and government that will look after the interests of Israel. It's time for Obama to wake up and face reality.He's doing enough damage to his own Country and Israel is not about to let him damage her. Mr. Obama, Israel is the ONLY genuine ally that the USA has in the is region.
24. #8 THEN REMOVE ARABS FROM ISRAEL SO SETTLERS COULD LIVE THER
(04.17.09)
CAN'T HAVE EXPANSION OF ARAB POPULATION IN ISRAEL, AND GIVE ARABS THE WEST BANK TOO. WHERE DO YOU SUPPOSE THE JEWS SHOULD LIVE? ISRAEL IS VERY SMALL, AND THE ONLY COUNTRY WHERE JEWS DECIDE THEIR FAITH AS A NATION IS ISRAEL. THE ARAB NATION HAS MANY COUNTRIES WHERE THEY MAKE DECISIONS FOR THEMSELF. SO LONG AS ARAB POPULATION STAYS IN ISRAEL, JEWISH POPULATION STAYS IN WEST BANK.
25. #8 - Polygraph, Settlers aid in security and contribute...
Joe ,   Ramat Gan   (04.17.09)
... to the Arabs' economy in Judea and Samaria just like they did in Gaza. Also, seeing as a good portion of the land these "settlers" are on was legally claimed by the Kingdom of Jordan, who renounced their claims of sovereignty in 1988, the land really has no legal owner. Does appropriating something that does not have any legal owner count as "land theft"? I think you're understanding of the reality here needs to move beyond sound bytes spoon-fed to you by CNN and the BBC...
26. The Jewish people are not "settlers" Jews returned Home
(04.16.09)
The Jewish people came back to the their own country. We didn't come here as settlers. We've come back, we've RETURNED home. If any nation refuses to accept this historical must deal with that in whatever ways they want. It is not our problem.
27. bibi is right on!
oded   (04.17.09)
sen. mitchel should pressure the palis instead of israel.... previous govts of israel have made tremendous amounts of concessions towards the arabs only to recieve homocide- bobmbers by the dozens, and hamastan...... the grevious party hereIS NOT the arabs, but the israelis. preassure the arabs to start making thei.r concessions!
28. Jordan is Palestine Mandate, but is ruled by 0.1% of populac
Jae ,   Lynn US   (04.17.09)
populace. The hashemite "kingdom" represents the rule of the hashemite clan, a clan that came from saudi arabia, and was given 78% of "palestine" as reward for siding and helping brits defeat Turks in WW1. How is it that 0.1% of population, rules 80%- the "palestinians"? This is backward and outrageous, I dont care how Americanized and massachusetts prep-schooled Abdullah is. He is 0.1% of the populace ruling a population that is 80% palestinian on land that is 78% of "palestine." herein is the 2 state solution. period . End of sentence.
29. Marco...
Gilad ,   Haifa, israel   (04.17.09)
Only a pretty pathetic fighting force could call any of those wars "victories" considering the opposing sides sustained much more damage casualties, territorial loss and the failure to achieve their objective, namely israels destruction. 1973 a draw? How is it that Israel still controls the golan and gave back the Sinai 7 years later? I guess when you're so used to losing the term "victory" has to change. As long as Israel exists we know we are the voctorious ones, marco.
30. FINALLY!
Robert ,   USA   (04.17.09)
It's the truth... deal with it.
Next talkbacks
Back to article