News
'IDF troops were never at risk in Naalin'
Ali Waked
Published: 06.06.09, 12:48
Comment Comment
Print comment Print comment
Back to article
10 Talkbacks for this article
1. well, that settles it
mike ,   israel (formerly usa   (06.06.09)
if the palestinians say it, it must be true. let the sentencing begin!
2. hahaha mike
yaron ,   il   (06.06.09)
i love how the eyewitness claims that the victim was shot in the heart as he was helping a wounded man. is there anything more innocent?
3. Good job Soldier
Sara ,   Woodstock, Canada   (06.06.09)
well, some rascals throw stones on the disciplined army, and army is supposed to keep their finger in mouth, and request them not to throw! Good job Soldier. Kill more of these rascals.
4. CONTRIBUTED to his dealth?????
ahmed   (06.06.09)
Man, israel in its entirety should be nominated for a nobel prize in literature. because shakespeare himself couldnt make use of language and words the way they do.. when people fire missiles at israel its terrorism. those savages should "renounce" violence (the palestinian side) and fight democratically. oooh wait democratically if the correct part for israel is chosen, dictatorially if otherwise. why cant those savages learn from peaceful israelis who dont ever murder anyone (white phosphorus on baby skin is self defence). why cant they learn from the phosphorus light unto the nations and demonstrate in the streets? not like they'll be killed for that too.. and not like a fence carving up 80% of your farm (appropriation its called. in other countries its called theft) gives one justification to protest. well not if you're a savage arab. so this man (sorry terrorist) is killed by an israeli bullet. and the colourful description of this murder is what..... it CONRIBUTED to his death. it didnt kill him. it didnt murder him. it didnt cause his death, it CONTRIBUTED to it. was he already dying might i ask? was he on his deathbead? did he arrive at the protest already bullet ridden from other terrorist activities, and that final bullet contributed? i look forward to my post being rejected. it used to make me mad, but now i know better. it is a desperate people who cannot bear to print the truth.
5. Excuse me
Sarah ,   New York City, USA   (06.06.09)
Do you have to be "at risk" before you quell a riot? Oh, I thiink not. If this had happened in Saudi Arabia, the perpetrators would be meeting the headsman on a Friday, REAL SOON. Cut me a break!
6. Another report from Palestinian sources
freejay333 ,   ISrael   (06.06.09)
Typical of Mr Waked propaganda. All his articles are from un named sources! This is far from professional accurate reporting. Shame on you YNet!
7. 4 - yes, contributed
mike ,   israel (formerly usa   (06.06.09)
actually being a member of a terrorist organization tends to be a major factor in the lifespan of palestinians, mainly because terrorists are not the smartest people out there (by definition) and it is usually only a matter of time.
8. what an oxymoron
david ,   new york   (06.06.09)
palestinian peace activists
9. Not at risk?
Michael D. ,   Ra'anana, Israel   (06.06.09)
There is only one person qualified to judge whether the soldiers are at risk or not: the commanding officer. Eyewitness testimony from civilian sources, particularly biased civilian sources with no military background is worthless. The officer commanding and the soldier who fired the shot will both have to explain their actions before a court of inquiry. Why try to conduct a trial in the court of public opinion?
10. Raze the village and expel all inhabitants with force!
jason white ,   afula,israel   (06.06.09)
And the leftists that support them. And all foreigners that come to cause trouble should be jailed for a year,then deported!
Back to article