News
Clinton: US, others working on new Iran measures
Associated Press
Published: 14.02.10, 19:18
Comment Comment
Print comment Print comment
Back to article
14 Talkbacks for this article
1. IRAN WILL NOT CHANGE ITS COURSE !!!.
Arn. ,   SWEDEN.   (02.14.10)
Clinton said in her speech Sunday, the US and others are working on "new measures" to try to persuade Iran to change its course. IRAN WILL TAKE THIS COURSE - US chief of staff says hopes sanctions on Iran won't lead to conflict Admiral Michael Mullen, Chairman of the United States' Joint Chiefs of Staff (CJCS) said that the US administration is very serious in its plans to impose heavy sanctions on Iran and expressed hope that the step will not result in a conflict, during a press briefing at the US Embassy in Tel Aviv. (Maya Lecker) -THIS CONFLICT IRAN HAS PREPERED ITSELF MILITARILY, FOR MANY YEARS. AND MAY STRIKE FIRST MILITARILY THROUGH SYRIA. Arn. .
2. Deja vu Part 1
Christopher ,   Boston, MASS   (02.14.10)
The US and the Eurabians are repeating the same steps they took in the 30s: Head in sand syndrome preferring to trade with the IslamoNazis rather than protecting themselves. Like then, the US and the Eurabians are more than happy to sacrifice the Jews in the hopes of placating the butchers of Islam. There is one significant difference now as to then: The Jews are prepared to defend themselves, an issue that is driving the rest of the world crazy and asking "why won't the Jews just shut up and walk in to the ovens again to save the rest of the world?"
3. Deja Vu Part 2
Christopher ,   Boston, MASS   (02.14.10)
Like in the 30s, many States are willingly allowing the Nazis to grow so they can reap a financial reward. Look at the Swiss and their growing financial trade with Iran...sound familiar?; Look at American and German companies finding ways to circumvent the lackluster toothless sanctions in place...sound familiar? And of course the Brits who yet again are poised to sacrifice Jews in the name of the "greater good"...sound familiar? Only one left is the Vatican, who will join the entourage and again find ways to egg on the Nazis in the hopes of fulfilling their goal of eradicating the "Christ killers"........sound familiar?
4. China
Resistor   (02.14.10)
China (1.31billion people) says phhhhhhhhhhhttt!! Middle finger raised to USA.
5. CLINTON TALKING TO ARABS:WORRYING
Ian ,   Newcastle upon Tyne,   (02.14.10)
I wouldn't trust Mrs Clinton not to use the situation to stab Israel in the back. If she wants Arab support for sanctions on Iran,she might just decide to throw in the sweetener of pressure on Israel to gain it. This US administration is the equivalent of Britain's New Labour government and cannot be trusted as a friend of Israel.
6. Sanctions should be aimed @ Israel
Paco ,   Canada   (02.14.10)
and not Iran. Iran is a peaceful country unlike Israel who is constantly stealing lands, getting into constant yearly wars with Palestine, Lebanon and Syria.. claiming its the victim when its clearly not. The Land of Palestine has been occupied illegally for a longtime, it will be soon freed on 4 fronts. Without Israel, the ME would be a heavenly peaceful place!
7. #4 china; to resister..
rob ,   orangevale USA   (02.14.10)
Weapons to Taiwan! visits from the Dalai Lama! USA (600 million people) says phhhhhhhhhhhttt !!! Middle finger raised to China. See how it works. Stay tuned.....We in the US face no nationalists trying to separate from our country. China will in the end toe the line. "resistance is futile"!!!
8. clinton bla bla bla
alexi   (02.14.10)
Clinton is a blowtorch who has now record of accomplishment in foreign affairs or security period. It will be left to israel and france hides behind israel. It is true that iran felt it had to develop wmd when saddam was launching it with chemicals via scuds. However, iran does not distinguish control of wmd by states vs terror operatives like hezbollah and hamas. It is likely that it would give a suitcase nuclear device to hezbollah to explode in tel aviv to kill 50,000 poeple. Jimmy Carter and his stooge brzezinski, a useless NSC advisor are largely responsible in preventing the shah's armed forces from liquidating the ayalollahs. Talkinig about useless leaders, olmert is publishing a book and making comments on barak and others before he is convicted and sent to jail which will happen without a doubt. He says barak gave him bad advice for gaza when olmert wanted to topple hamas and retake philadelphia. We know barak is a reluctant and weak leader, though a good commando.It was on his shoulders to make a decision and not blame barak. For me< I would replace him with yaalon fast but its not up to me. Gaza was not easy and the idf beat the hell out of hamas, yet stopped because it did not want to take day to day responsibility. I would have retaken philadelphi. Olmert wants to screw barak and hates him. Yet olmert was a laughing stock, a weak coward trying to run the country withlivni., another weakling. So his talk, like halutz's is full of rubbish. Israel will be destroyed if olmert ever regains the PM office. Convict him fast or trade him for shalit.
9. iran will win the battle for nuclear right, get used to it l
al   (02.14.10)
iran has the very right to enrich uranium and it will do that so you better get used to it lady. you and your people are not a match for iran.
10. #9 "you and your people"...
rob ,   orangevale USA   (02.14.10)
You are absolutely right that the US is no match for Iran. No more than an elephant (US) to an ant (Iran). The "you and your people" remark, only solidifies our will to defeat you. You have clearly defined your dehumanizing hatred for us. It makes our choice less painful. There will be fire in the middle east, and you will not escape it if you are in Iran. Enrich away. It may be the death of your nation. Mullah talk will not endure the test of total war, nor will your terrorist proxies.
11. Hillary and the Muslim Obama
Dan ,   USA   (02.14.10)
Like most of what6 Hillary says and does it it all meaningless and self serving. She is a powerless pawn of the Muslim Obama who will not mind at all when Iran gets the bomb. After all it will help to keep Israel in line. Both Clinton, whose husband collects millions of dollars from rich Arabs, and Obama are dangers to Israel.
12. #6Paco Middle East Peaceful?Don't make me laugh.
Ian ,   Newcastle upon Tyne,   (02.14.10)
Is Paco implying that if Israel didn't exist Iraq wouldn't have attacked Iran and Kuwait,there wouldn't be civil war in Yemen,Saudi Arabia wouldn't be exporting terrorism and so on and so on? Iran is the cause of the current tension between Israel and Lebanon by its sponsorship of Hizbollah terrorism.It would be fairer to say that the Middle East would be a less dangerous place if the present Iran regime ceased to exist.
13. #10, Rob
IRAN#1   (02.15.10)
You no understand amigo, this is an Israeli newspaper site, I think the guy was tlkaing about Israelis not gringos!
14. iran
azad ,   edmonton   (02.15.10)
talk talk more sectiones why crying iran? why not israel's neculear bomb invite iran for positive talk my advise to mrs clinton
Back to article