News
Report: US shipping arms ahead of strike on Iran
Ynet
Published: 17.03.10, 08:50
Comment Comment
Print comment Print comment
Back to article
67 Talkbacks for this article
31. DUMB MOVE
Marcel ,   Florida   (03.17.10)
All this specific information leaks out for one purpose. If I were the Iranian military leader I would not wait for an openly planned attack by the US ALL laid out in the media. I would quietly plan a Pearl Harbor type sneak attack on all US bases and Naval forces in the immediate area and wait for the air traffic from Diego Garcia and hit them with SAM's long before they got near Iran. Loose lips have sunk this ship.
32. Wipe these nasty ayatollahs off the map
Eric ,   Boston   (03.17.10)
of this earth. Go USA.
33. Reality Check
Christopher ,   Boston, MASS   (03.17.10)
NoBama won't strike Iran. He will not risk offending Farakhan, Wright, Emanuell, Clinton, and Chavez.
34. Perwians are Good People
Marwan ,   USA   (03.17.10)
Iranians are cool. The government is whacked out unfortunately. If Obama attacks Iran, it will be for his Wahabbi financiers. The innocent will suffer for Saudi oil once again. Let the people of Iran remove their government.
35. is it Irans facilities or another illegal nukes they bomb?
(03.17.10)
36. good grief the israelis are really clutching at straws
(03.17.10)
37. @13.Obama pacifist? LOL Watch Aghanistan & Pakistan!
David ,   Germany   (03.17.10)
"Obama won't do anything. He's a laughingstock pacifist. More talk...talk...talk. " I only wonder why Obama did just sent arround 50.000 american soldiers to Afghanistan and why his new war strategy together with pakistan is so succesfull catching importan taliban and al qaida figures, if he is a pacifist and do only talk talk talk ????????!
38. TALKBACK NUMBER 18.
Arn. ,   SWEDEN.   (03.17.10)
Iran ready for nuclear fuel exchange inside country Iran has said it is ready for a one-shot nuclear fuel exchange on its own soil, edging closer to the conditions of a plan drawn up by the UN atomic watchdog last year as major powers mulled a new round of sanctions. Iran's atomic chief Ali Akbar Salehi revealed the new offer in an interview published by hardline daily Jawan on Wednesday, signaling a major change in Tehran's longstanding position on the nuclear fuel plan first drafted last October. (AFP) HOW CAN IRAN BE TRUSTED, IF IRAN SAYS IT BELIEVE THEIR URANIUM WILL BE STOLEN ABROAD IN AN EXCHANGE ???. THEN IRAN CAN ALSO STEAL THE IRANIUM FROM ABROAD, ON THEIR OWN TERRITORY ???. OR IS THIS PROPAGANDA ONLY, FÖR THEIR OWN POPULATION AND THE WORLDOPINION ???. Arn.
39. bunker busters-#20
jim ,   chicago   (03.17.10)
if you think israel will use nuclear weapons on iran you're not playing with a full deck.
40. Not Gonna Happen! Obama Loves Iran
David H ,   Marietta USA   (03.17.10)
But with that Anti-Semite in the White House, the real target could be Tel Aviv or Haifa. Yeah, it's that bad over here.
41. IF THE AMMUNITION SUITABLE
This crap MAHMOOD ,   LONDON-UK   (03.17.10)
To blow the underground facilities have been moved nearer to Iran,what exactly is expected?Are we being told that the Iranians will bow down to be dictated by the USA because the dangerous bombs are being kept ready for use?Is Iran being threatened that USA means business?Threat of this type was applicable,probably for Iraq..................not for Iran.
42. #27 Agree Sydneyman - "robert" is filling in for "Lydia"
Scott ,   Sunshine Coast, Aust   (03.17.10)
..she's the other idiot that makes regular obnoxious ejaculations in this forum. These prawns have absolutely no idea of what's happening here in Aussie ...let alone in the M.E.
43. Bush Doctrine - In full effect, pur and simple
AY_Lamb ,   Globestan   (03.17.10)
Only way for Obama to avoid a "7 Days in may scenario" and when push come to shove he is an evangelical just like the christophiles at the pentagon. Once Iran is down subjugation of Israel is next or maybe even simultaneous.
44. Sounds more like a Leftist attack on the US
William ,   Israel   (03.17.10)
Listen to the lingo of the researcher - “They are gearing up totally for the destruction of Iran.". This guy is trying to make any attack on Iran as against it's people and institutions, not against the govt and military installations. And where is it published? In a Scottish daily, where Scots are known uber Leftists and supporters of despots. So how exactly will the US hit "10,000 targets in 3 hours" with just under 400 bombs? If anything, this action by the US is little more than normal stockpiling and a subtle message to Iran to stop attacking US troops in Iraq. Nothing else.
45. #31 - like cold war Soviet-US tensions
William ,   Israel   (03.17.10)
no matter who starts the conflict, both will either be badly wounded or destroyed. Ergo, neither side is in a rush to start a conflict regardless of the rhetoric you hear. Iran may be a bit more willing because they do so for radical religious reasons (to bring the last Imam) but even they are gun-shy. A Pearl Harbor incident isn't likely anymore.
46. #36 - Didn't know Israelis owned Scottish news media
William ,   Israel   (03.17.10)
But to your ilk, we Jews own all of the media and print negative articles to "throw you off". Wild ride.
47. My apologies to Aussies #27, #42
William ,   Israel   (03.17.10)
if I insulted you in my reply to Racist Robert #23. It was meant specifically for him and his ilk, not all Aussies.
48. Obama is no friend of Israel
will edwards ,   dallas tx usa   (03.17.10)
I don't believe this story for a minute. It is the ambitious ramblings of some reporter almost like the organ stealing stories. Obama may not like the Iranians but he is proving himself to be very pro Islam and definitely anti- Israel. Like his predecessor GW Bush, he talks out of the side of his mouth while stabbing us in the back.
49. #41 whoops
will edwards ,   dallas tx usa   (03.17.10)
I accidentally recommended your talkback but I meant to add a comment. My comment is this. Anything you say is probably going to be a lie because you are a Muslim and as such are dedicated to the murder of innocent people just because they don't follow your wicked religion. One day the world will be rid of your kind.
50. 37# The day that Obama actually instigates a war...
Steven Wilson ,   Anchorage, Alaska   (03.17.10)
and does it on his own....will show everyone if he has a set between his you know what. Don't try to take credit for what Bush started. Obama would have never even gone into any of the countries on his own. They had to pull out his teeth to get him to send the troops that you tout. He ho hummed for months while other troops were getting killed. Your party ran on pacifist intentions. No more War.....No more War. Just because he sent a token amount of troops.....does it make him a leader. The missiles are doing the job with the military launching them. Obama couldn't and wouldn't be caught dead next to a military instillation. Well I'll take that back.....he does chum the military installations for sympathy votes. This guy was voted in to bring everyone home plain and simple. The Democratic party with the Democratic news media complained and cried for 6 years displaying dead soldiers on television every night. Don't try to change history....your party is a bunch of whimpering pansies who don't ...and won't fight when necessary. When is the Democratic news media going to show the 4000 aborted children that they kill every day of the week in the United States? They campaigned every night on the news for 6 years about the deaths of 4000 soldiers....while they killed 4000 a day in abortion clinics. And they weren't even enemy combatants.
51. #12 observer
Hal ,   Usa   (03.17.10)
Observer, did you attend Mahmmod's madrasa as well? Do you even know anything about weapons or are you guessing like most of the chickens in the blogging barnyard? If and or when any action takes place in reagards to Irans secret places, you and Mahmood will be as bystanders to a cataclysm. Since decribing to you how this all works in the real world of weaponry is moot, in your cases, suffice it to say that the Iranian built up targets will be numerous and the destruction will be as well.
52. # 13 & 50 Stevie Boy
Hal ,   Usa   (03.17.10)
Run out of "Ice Trucker" episodes to drink beer to? Since Captain Phil pased on, his crab boat needs a crew member. Your tired and ingnorant rantings are as ridiculous as your fake former govenor Sarah the "Pale Rider" Palin. Too much twillight for your zone up there? Your hate and stupidity are as foul as that other bird on this blog, Badmood from Londonistan. Maybe you two can set aside your religious differences and hook up with Peter the fool from Vienna and start a rock band!
53. " DIEGO GARCIA "..... SOUND BRITISH TO ANYONE ??
ABRAHAM ben JACOB ,   CANADA   (03.17.10)
ANOTHER BIBLICAL HISTORICAL BRITISH PROPERTY, GIVEN BY DIVINE RIGHT TO THE BRITISH EMPIRE. SAME AS THEY OWN THE FALKLANDS OR " MALVINAS " PROPERTY ALSO BY DIVINE RIGHT.
54. SIMPLE POLITICS...............................#49
MAHMOOD ,   LONDON-UK   (03.17.10)
I don't mind you writing what you did.It does not hurt me at all.But I wish you were right.And you also know that you are not,buddy!!The subject matter is that Iran will have no bearing on the movements of these bombs,if that is what is bugging you.
55. #53
Chris   (03.17.10)
You are angry with Britain because it owns land that once belonged to another country? In that case, you should be angry with most nations! For a start, Muslims believe that once any land is conquered by them it is theirs forever. Why are you not complaining about that attitude? Britain has willingly given back areas that it once took control of. Most of these still keep good relations with Britain as part of the Commonwealth of Nations. I doubt I'll see the day when any Muslim country does this.
56. We can only hope that this is the truth ...
Lee ,   Manchester UK   (03.17.10)
it would certainly make me stand back and give obama some breathing space. Alas! it sounds to good to be true. Either will Israel wil lget attacked, i just hope and pray no Israelis die. My hopes and prayers are with you always Israel.
57. # 41 & 54 Madmood
Hal ,   Usa   (03.18.10)
Special Agent Mahmood, how deep are these underground facilities? Are they under Mosques? Do you have the secret codes to Iranian top security messages? How come you know so much about what is going on there? No, really Mahmood, I find it facinating. Your every post reads like, well, Janes. It is uncanny that a top person such as yourself would be posting on an Israeli website with so much at stake. Cheeky my boy, very cheeky. Speaking of cheeky Mahmood, why have you never voiced any support for the poor people of Iran that are, as we speak, suffering greatly at the hands of the illegal junta running Iran. Have you no sympathy for them? PS- Glad to see you back and as spunky as ever!
58. SPARE THE CIVILIANS
LEVI MATTHEW ,   USA   (03.18.10)
I AGREE WITH YOU MARWAN. I THINK INSTEAD OF BOMBING IRAN; THE LEADERS OF THE WORLD NEED TO SETTLE THEIR OWN DISPUTES IN A BOXING RING; AND LEAVE THE CIVILIAN'S OUT OF IT. BUT PROPHECY, IS PROPHECY, AND THE SHOW IS ABOUT TO BEGIN!!!
59. Iran's Unfortunate Regime
Jason Chung ,   USA   (03.18.10)
We all know deep down inside that when all is said and done, the regime of Iran cannot be trusted by anyone in the world to possess weapons of mass destruction. This is not about Islam: it is about a crazy regime that has no sympathy for the people of the world. It is to the benefit of all people that every measure be taken to ensure they do not acquire nuclear weapons. Regards.
60. More false WMD war-crimes coming
Joe Blow ,   Washington, USA   (03.19.10)
Iran has never threatened Israel. What Iran has said is that "The junta in Jerusalem must fall," not that the country should be destroyed. And yet this monstrous lie continues to be spread. If the USA says that Chavez, Morales, etc must go, does that mean that they wish to destroy Venezuela - Bolivia - whoever? No. And the same argument applies to Iran.
Previous talkbacks
Next talkbacks
Back to article