Zamir should maybe take a social anthropology or sociology course?

Men are forced to buy. Supply and demand. Girls have the supply, they set the price to gain something. Girls with high income and status tend not to marry anyone, and never anyone with less income, power, or status. Girls don't share.

Thanks for pointing out the blatantly obvious. Men do it too though.

in rank, even if consensual, is not social climbing. It is rape of a junior by a senior since the difference in rank is an intimidating factor. California recognized that and has a law that sex between two people in the same organization command structure where a junior is subject to retaliation by a senior if sexual advances are rebuffed, that the situation is rape of the junior person. The seniors should be prosecuted. The position of Y'hovah on sin is that He can forgive most sins, but not three. He cannot forgive unbelief. He cannot forgive blasphemy of the Holy Spirit. And He cannot forgive not providing for your own. King David understood that and he supported every woman he had sex with by marrying the woman, taking the women as concubines, and even supporting a divorced wife (Michael). The concubines who were sexually defiled by one of his sons were also provided for, but David would not have sex with them again nor would he have sex with the reconciled divorced wife (Michael, King Saul's daughter). David was a man after God's own heart. Learn from that. Keep your peckers in your pants.

everyone knows women use sex in order to get status.this individual had the courage to say it loud and clear. many women might not like to hear it.., but that does not make the gentlemen statements less true.

I do believe that Mr. Zamir should take his antiquated sexism and resign!

it must have taken you years of study to arrive at such a conclusion !!!!!!

What's the matter Ynet, got nothing else to pad out the pages with? Moreover, I don't agree with what he wrote. Women are becoming much more powerful, which leads men to behave like puppies around them. Lots of women have now adopted the f**k 'em and chuck'em regine, and it works ver well.

This is such blatant misogyny. I am appalled. He is meant to be an educator. He claims this is the "secular/humanist" world view? Is he smoking crack? This is very close to the religious world view on promiscuity amongst women especially his view that the male has the advantage because of "penetration". I am shocked and appalled. In a Western country this person would be made to resign.

I'll be teaching my daughters to make sure they are armed with enough confidence and facts to engage idiots like this in public debate and tear them down to size. What a pompous, phallo-centric turd this guy is. Unfortunately, he represents an ethos that used to call female soldiers "mizronim" (mattresses). From what he says, a lot of the senior guys sound like they still do. Israel remains decades behind the west in social development, and this guy is a perfect example of how retarded many of those in places of power are.

come on. he's not saying all women use sex to get ahead, and he's not saying some men don't rape. he's saying some women (some of those who have the ability) do. just like some men who have the ability (a penis) rape. oone is not a pre-requisite for the other. anyone who claims the other is an idiot. the only thing i would take issue with is the tone in which he presents prostitution. once again - true. market forces at play. not all prostitutes are drug addicts. some take pride in their work. just as some women in an honest society would admit that they used sex to get ahead. at the end of the day, it'll only get you in the door. what you do inside the room determines if you survive.

This is not the first time Danny Zamir, head of an extreme-Left military academy was in the news. The last time was when he covered for his students who invented false accusations about the IDF committing war crimes in order to make some money. Interesting if Barak will expel Zamir, or simply laugh at this offensive remark.

Unbelievable naive. The chairman of the Academy no less.

Girls do it because they're scared the guy will leave them. I been a teenager myself once and I was surrounded with girls who's boyfriends told them straight and clear "Either you put out, either I leave you". It's the guys who want to stick their thing into anything with a heartbeat, in attempt to get rid of their virginity like it were a life terminaing disease. After the 1st time they've done it this turns into a marathon of "who humped more". So, this Pre-military Academy jerk now comes forward and tells "Listen up, fellas, unpopular and emotionally vounrable girls are more likely to put out! There's the nookie jackpot!" He better quit, no wonder the IDF is full of sex crazed pompous chauvinist jerks.

1. This is ridiculously stereotyping young girls and misunderstanding them. It's people who believe that men and women are not equal sexually who make them unequal sexually. Equality lies within the mind. This stereotyping only further polarizes the sexes. 2. THIS ARTICLE IS WRITTEN SO POORLY. Where are Ynet's standards?

When I was ca 4 years old, I used to get upset that my brother, rather than interrupt playing outside, could relieve himself standing up behind a tree, while I, trying the same thing, would only end up being soaked down to my shoes, having to go home to change clothes. Then one day, I got a glimpse of his “secret,” and demanded “one of those,” so I, too, could do #1 standing behind a tree. I don't remember whether or not my mother laughed, but she tried to explain things. Realizing that I wasn't too interested in the scientific details, she cut her lesson short with something that didn't alleviate my immediate problem, but gave me immense hope for the future. She made it very clear that, my brother being a boy and I being a girl, getting one of “those” was out of the question right then. “But,” she said, “when you're all grown up, I promise that with one of these you can get more of “those” than you should want.” By the time the meaning hit me and I would have liked to laugh with her about it, she had, unfortunately, died. When I told my brother a few years ago of my serious penis envy at that age, he burst out laughing, recalling our mother's explanation for his testicles, which he thought were his brain. He was spared a long speech and only got a curt, “Noch nicht, Bubchen, noch nicht.” (Not yet, baby boy, not yet.) Hearing at some point that the brain was in one's head, my brother said he wondered for a long time whether this transfer would be gradual or whether his testicles would disappear behind his eyeballs in one sudden, hopefully not too painful or public, whoosh. Mom might not have been an expert on sex education, but she did make an impression and the memories of her efforts are priceless.

and the girls who get raped asked for it- ? what absolute horse pukey- I thought male chauvinist pigs like this had gone the way of the dinosaurs- I stand corrected. Who is he?

great story Mr. Hartley- maybe this is where Danny whatshisname still has HIS brain , that would explain it all LOL

This guy confuses who pitches and who receives as the reason for lack of emotional involvement, and he's wrong. People who have sex without feeling an emotional involvement don't have to be male, they have to have been emotionally numbed as children. They don't identify with their own bodies, much less someone else's. Ian

jail right along with Bill Cosby right about now.