sorry for the broken English -------------------------------------------------- There are two things that they are the insurance certificate of Israel: God of Israel , Dimona Nuclear facility. About God - 70 years ago it did not work so well, so I guess we stayed with the Dimona option

Iran sign a peace agreement with Israel and recognized Israel as a jewish state

ish State with Judaism as its predominant religion

Tehran Conference was a success gathering 60 countries from all over the world. It was larger and more effective than US conference. It was really a harsh beating to US and Israel. Now with 60 countries and more DEMANDING ISRAEL TO GO UNDER NPA and DESTROY NUKES. As for Insurance certificates, Nukes will be soon lifted from Insurance policy, No Nukes. And As for God of Israel God left you thousand years ago Your insurance policy is empty,

OF COURSE NOT. so why the sheol should israel pay any attention to this? in fact, signing things like the npt will only endanger israel's security.

just the fact that the jewish people have a state shows that the GOD of Israel always keeps his promise to the jewish Nation and protect us.

Your English works - and You are absolutely right about Israels nuclear deterrence...No other state on this planet is more entitled to use the ultimate weapon to its defense...

He says the international community should take action to disarm Israel as part of the efforts to make the Middle East a nuclear weapons-free zone (PressTV, Mon, 12 Apr 2010). Some developing (Turkey) and nonnuclear nations talk of a “nuclear free zone” in the Middle East which is widely recognized as a code phrase for requiring Israel to give up its unacknowledged nuclear arsenal. The IAEA General Conference passed a resolution on Sept. 18, 2009, that "calls upon Israel to accede to the NPT and place all its nuclear facilities under comprehensive IAEA safeguards." The resolution did not call on India and Pakistan, two countries that carried out underground nuclear tests, to accede to the NPT, and there was no resolution reprimanding Iran for its continuous non-adherence to IAEA requests for information on its suspect nuclear program (INSS).

"Whether you’re an NPT party or not, there’s a common interest in ensuring that this regime does not unravel," Einhorn said. The US has said that it wants countries like Pakistan to help prevent further proliferation of nuclear weapons even if they are not willing to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Robert J. Einhorn, special adviser on non-proliferation and arms control to the US Department of State, also said that Washington wanted India, Pakistan and China to ratify the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, once it was approved by the US Senate. At a briefing in Washington on the new US nuclear policy, Mr Einhorn said the US realised that India might never sign the NPT and accepted the Indian position. He warned that the non-proliferation regime was under considerable threat these days, especially because of the non-compliance of North Korea and Iran (10 Apr, 2010, Dawn.Com). Responding to a question as to why India, Israel and Pakistan were not included in the NPT, Einhorn said the Obama Administration wants these nations to work with it to help prevent proliferation of nuclear arms and technology know-how's. "We call on all countries, whether they have chosen to join the NPT or not, to work together to limit, to prevent, the threat of further nuclear proliferation. Whether you're an NPT party or not, there's a common interest in ensuring that this regime does not unravel," The Dawn quoted Einhorn, as saying. He also expressed concerns at the expanding nuclear capabilities of countries like Iran and North Korea, which have rejected America's non-proliferation regime. (US accepts India's stand on not signing NPT: State Dept Advisor, 2010-04-10, Sify.Com).

Usually I am anti-nuke for any country in any form. If Iran is after Israel to sign any type of NPT, I'm going to reverse myself and urge Israel to tell Iran "NO WAY!". Yeah, my choice of words would really be much stronger, but we should start diplomatically. Just say NO. Now if Iran should demonstrate its willingness to abandon its nuclear ambitions . . .

in violation of it by denying access to their nuclear facilities to international inspection.

Why do you need nuclear insurance, if you have God on your side? Or is it you don't belive that God will protect Israel and its people. And for the others, as long as Israel has nukes, soner or later other ME states will get the too. So you can either give them up or just stop crying like a baby when others get nukes too, its up to you.

Iran's nuclear installations are currently the most heavily monitored by the IAEA in the world today. Furthermore, Iran has not been accused of violating the NPT by the IAEA. There have been some SUSPICIONS and UNSUBSTANTIATED ACCUSATIONS raised against Iran's open and legal nuclear program by it enemies every once in a while. But the fact is there has been NO EVIDENCE provided by Iran's enemies at any time to prove their empty claims.

LOL ! You remind me of Sadaam Huseins former information minister !

You remind of GW's former Defense Secretary, Don Rumsfeld! LOL. He was so right on, wasn't he?