to say it's not and what you are to say not do you serve in the field do you read any report "said that Washington's "main concern should be Iran" that's what we get from ppl like you what we should and what we shouldn't if you that concern about Israel then may you should go back it's seems you are the best to decide what the best for Israel

Interesting remark from a citizen of Kurt Waldheim's country. By the way, which side was Austria on during WWII? How many Jews did Austria save?

Well, you must fell much more secure now that Hussein Obama appointed 2 devout Muslims to Homeland Security. I can sleep so much better now.

When Obama leaves office, it won't be another Bush that returns. It might be as well an Obama++ if Israel's actions put US troops at risk. Israel did that kind of miscalculation already in respect to the Palestinans.

Hussein Obama is on his way down and I very much hope, You are right with Your prediction for November. This man is not only arrogant, he is extremely dangerous and has done a lot of harm already. By the way Sarah, as Your true fan, I hope You will not make Yourself too rare...I always enjoy your thoughtful and clear arguments...

Obama's vision is clear: Jews, only because they are Jewish, may not reside anywhere but only where I say they can, and he is considered "progressive". Rabin's vision, as expressed in the Knesset in October 1995: 1. Jerusalem will remain united under Israel's sovereignty and will also include the suburbs of Giv'at Zeev and Ma'aleh Adumim 2. The Jordan Valley in its widest definition must remain under Israel's rule 3. Major settlement blocs, e.g. Gush Etzion, Ariel, will be incorporated into Israel's sovereign territory 4. A future Palestinian state will not be a regular state, e.g. air space and border passes will be controlled by Israel, demilitarized Perhaps the inexperienced President of the US should learn a thing or two from Rabin's vision which is very similar to that of Netanjahu's!!!

The Obama administration isn't interested in helping Israel to secure the lives of its citizens. It is perfectly willing to pretend away the Arab violence against Israel. Whether motivated by naivete, an overarching desire for international peace conferences, a plan to align US foreign policy with that of Europe, or hostility towards Israel, that fact that Mitchell can talk about peace when the Palestinians have just declared war makes clear that the Obama administration is uninterested in playing a constructive role in quelling the violence. It certainly isn't interested in helping Israel to secure the lives of its citizens. Should Israel be worried ? Consult : http://xrl.us/bfs9yb

high level government officials reveals the US government now assassinates its own citizens as well as foreign leaders with no one objecting to the policy that should be a cause for impeachment. Shocking. He is so discouraged, he wrote his last column for American Free Press this week on that subject and other injustices that go unaddressed in America. I hope he changes his mind and continues to write as a defender of the Republic. But Ronald Lauder should beware of the tactics of this administration that are continuing the Bush administration assassination policies of its own citizens. There have been many attempts on my life, but the Lord has delivered me so far. The policy of assassinating US citizens goes back a ways. During the Clinton Administration there were many assassinations or Arkancides such as Admiral Jeremy Boorda supposedly shooting himself four times with a rifle, as if that was possible. Craig Roberts (another author of books such as The Medusa File) interviewed the EMT techs who personally told him Admiral Boorda (a Jew) was shot four times. The x-ray of the skull of the Congressman Sonny Bono during Clinton years showed an indentation consistent with a dry ice bullet he was hit with as he skiied down a familiar hill. I think Governor Schwarzenegger was hit with a dry ice bullet when his leg broke while he was skiing for no apparent reason. Pray the blood of the Messiah over the protectors of the Republic, the few that are left who are publicly speaking out.

Avi, Avi, Avi,.... I think you should keep up to speed on facts. Petraeus did not say that the situation in Israel is endangering US troops. He even cam out several times to correct a gross exaggeration of a single line that was in a report several hundred pages long. So yes I think that when Lauder says this he is speaking from facts supported by Petraeus. Maybe when you are a little more knowledgeable with the facts you will be able to talk among the adults There is an old saying: It is better to keep quiet and let the world think you are a fool than to open your mouth and and remove all doubt. I think that's speaking to you Buddy :)

and voice his opinion or explain his agenda concerning US foreign policy. But if he attempts to meet with or financially support the electoral process of US officials, he should be registered/treated as an agent of a foreign government.