News
Report: US should better define, counter Islamic extremism
Associated Press
Published: 12.07.10, 12:09
Comment Comment
Print comment Print comment
Back to article
4 Talkbacks for this article
1. Brennan claims no directive barring use of words or phrases
Raymond in DC ,   Washington, DC USA   (07.12.10)
Brennan's claim is simply without foundation. The Department of Homeland Security has dropped the use of phrases "jihad", "Islamist", "Islamofascist", "Islamic extremist", etc. The recent report on the Fort Hood terror attack makes no mention of Islam as a motivation, though Hassan *himself* has admitted to it! The Pentagon fired their only (non-Musim) consultant on Islamic warfare, at the urging of a high-level (Muslim) officer. Meanwhile, the FBI and CIA are recruiting Arabic linguists among the Muslims of Dearborn. Brennan is a fool, as he made clear in a speech during which he threw out a little of his very rusty Arabic. He described "jihad" as a legitimate exercise ... in bettering oneself! Know the enemy? Not Brennan.
2. Lieberman is an Israeli agent.
ssshh..   (07.12.10)
3. Violent Islamic extremism...
Joey Rose ,   Portland   (07.12.10)
and why Obama does'nt call a spade a spade. Maybe this little report can shed some light. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tCAffMSWSzY
4. Islamic Terrorism
Ezra ,   Florida   (07.12.10)
Are you kidding? The US will never say the words "Islamic terrorism"or "Islamic jihad". They might "offend" someone... Eric Holder, the US Attorney General danced and kept tripping around his testimony in the senate tryung to avoid saying those "terrible" words in order not to offend his MUSLIM BOSS, THE HUSSEIN OF THE WHITE HOUSE, who ordered ALL government official not to utter those words at all. He, the Hussein is the first to be "offended"!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OY VEIGH
Back to article