Opinion
Obama still wants peace
Orly Azoulay
Published: 05.11.10, 00:45
Comment Comment
Print comment Print comment
Back to article
65 Talkbacks for this article
61. To: No. 60
Sarah B ,   U.S.A. / Israel   (11.08.10)
You are either incapable or too lazy to find information about all of the organizations under the PLO umbrella on your own. Well, I will not do your research you. Why not just contact the PLO office in New York and ask them? That's what I did. You wanted a list of terrorist acts in Israel in the past ten years; you got them -- and not just from me. You then turned around and said "No, I want other terrorist groups." (Do you realize how utterly absurd a request that is?) For all your blather about Fatah having agreed to repudiate its charter, it has yet to do so. Evidently, the overwhelming majority of Fatah members do not WANT to repudiate the charter which, as you know, calls for the destruction of the State of Israel and the extermination and/or expulsion of the Jewish people. Until the charter is repudiated, Fatah should remain content to be catnip. Until Fatah recognizes the right of the State of Israel to exist in its ancient homeland, and until Fatah recognizes the unique identity of the State of Israel as a Jewish state -- same result: catnip. But if anyone doubts the true nature of Fatah, they need look no further than the Oslo Accords -- which Israel signed, but which Fatah walked away from -- which meant, as I hope you know, walking away from an agreement which would have awarded Fatah (acting as the so-called "Palestine" Authority) 90% of the west bank and East Jerusalem as a capital. The agreement was rejected by Fatah, and they returned home and started the second intifada instead. There is only one conclusion and it is inescapable: the "Palestinians" do not want peace, and they are not interested in a two-state solution. They want the State of Israel. Silly buggers, but there you have it: more really unrealistic "Palestinian" dreams. "Matty," whatever the reasons for your support for unrelenting, violent terrorists, they are your own. Blissfully, most normal and sane people do not support terrorists. Have you ever wondered why you are treated with such disrespect and disdain on this and other fora? Why are you such a supporter of violent murderers? You know what? Don't bother to answer. I really do not want to know and, frankly, I don't much care. Your reasons are your own and, fortunately, you are irrelevant. Just another Rachel Corrie -- except one whose activism is restricted to pronouncements from the armchair. In that regard, Ms. Corrie was miles ahead of you -- and she was a pretty despicable character. So what does that make you, "Matty?" Don't bother answering. I already know the answer.
62. To: No. 55
Sarah B ,   U.S.A. / Israel   (11.08.10)
Still waiting for a response from you Gregory. I only want a response to O-N-E question -- in the fourth paragraph of my post at No. 54. Hmmm. I guess that makes you a BLUFF, doesn't it, now, Gregory?
63. To: No. 60, redux
Sarah B ,   U.S.A. / Israel   (11.08.10)
Oops, sorry! I meant the PLO offices in Washington D.C. Here's the number: (202) 974 6360. They will be more than happy to inform you that the PLO has twenty-eight member organizations, although they decline to name them all and they very apologetically also declined to send me the list. Gotta take them at their word, right? I mean "Palestinian" terrorists wouldn't lie, now, would they? Have fun, dear. Reading your posts, I well understand how much you enjoy hyperbole. You'll get an earful when you call the PLO -- I promise -- and not much else.
64. :: Sarah BS - #61
Matty Groves ,   Fairport   (11.09.10)
No Sarah BS I did show you various credible references which totally squashed your claim that the PLO membership comprised of over 28-30 members which you have been unable to back up. Your latest lame claim that you ‘rang’ the ‘PLO office in New York’ - oops - meant ‘Washington D.C.’ is just that - another ‘claim’. Again no proof, no substance. No my question was very specific and your attempt to try and generalize it only shows how desperate you are to wriggle out of the fact that you could not back up your ‘claim’ again. Let me show you what I clearly stated: “Out of the *ten current members of the PLO* which ones have committed a terrorist attack in the last ten year?” I even listed some of the ten ie: “PAF, PDU, PPP, PPSF, As Sa'iqa, PLF”. It was very simple, all you had to do was cite one or more terrorist attacks by any of the current PLO members within the last ten years but you couldn’t all you could do was paste two links which listed ‘every’ attack dating back to 1993 most of which were unaccredited to any specific Palestinian faction. In short you did not cite a specific current member of the PLO who carried out a terrorist attack within the last ten year just like you could not show that the membership of the PLO ranges from 28-30 or that I entered into a “ad hominem” argument with Brian Cohen or why Israel is negotiating with one ‘terrorist group’ but not another. As usual you have failed dismally to back up your ‘claims’ and the more nonsense you keep replying with only make you look more foolish as you are not providing any facts that can be substantiated.
65. # 62
Gregory ,   Montreal, Canada   (11.09.10)
My response is a simple and honest one - I do not know the answer. I am not a Canadian and with my limited knowledge of Canadian-French history I do not want to answer the question. Is it too much to expect the same HONESTY from you? Can you stop pretending to be the intellect that you are not? I will give you a F Grade for your responses thus far to questions posed by Matty Groves.
Previous talkbacks
Back to article