Good job! Salma and the rest of the "day dream" pallis...where are you now? Why don't you arrange teens from overseas to "help" them coming out of jail?

Peace, as in 'if we don't agree with you, you end up in pieces.'

Denmark always had less antisemitism then most other places in Europe. Hopefully Muslims aren't going to change that.

"AFTER SATURDAY COMES SUNDAY'

We have a sick culture, that endorses this kind of behavior. The fact that the local Muslim council denounces it means nothing. First what is important is what they teach their kids, which is hate, second they practice "Al-Taqiya". It is important to understand your enemy and what they think. "Al-Taqiya" is the concept that a Muslim can lie to what they perceive to an enemy and for their safety. It means you say what they(people like you and me) want to hear in order to further your plans to kill them. This idea come from the Koran itself. Basically you can disguise your true beliefs and your held blameless for it (put simply you an lie). Just Google the term in Wikipedia or other sources. The Muslims really DON'T want this to get out. because it nullifies all their fake and hollow " I'm sorry" for this act or that act of violence. So in this case for the Muslim council to endorse this act of evil might put them in danger, so they can lie, and say they denounce it, but they really don't, they approve of it. But to say that would put them at risk. That is "Al-Taqiya" the concept. But just look at their actions and school books and the truth is right there to see and read.

the only logical conclusion that can be drawn from these events is to import more muslims and make life so unbearable for jews that that want to leave.

If you don't understand, read or read again the Mark of Georgia's comment...

"He described some the suspects as "militant Islamists with relations to international terror networks" SOME of the suspects? What about the others? Who were they? It would appear that Islam and civilization are incompatible. If you had to choose, which one would you pick? Which one is worth preserving? The stated objective was to "kill as many people as possible." Innocent people. A goal motivated by Islam. So, which is worth preserving? Islam or civilization? How much more proof will be required until people actually manage to grasp the fact that it really is one or the other; not both.

to say this after each bombing

I was watching ALJAZEERA this evening and I have seen how the Muslims behaving in Denmark.An Arab guy raised one finger to the policeman. The Muslims were really behaving really very badly and in aggressive way I agree with the police and the politicians that any immigrant who do not behave should be kicked out of the country.Hell,the immigrants are still new in the country and are making demands,G D help Denmark in 50-70 years time,Muslims will demand independence from Denmark or at least partition like India,& Israel. WAKE UP DANES & EUROPE before it is too late

Sadly, using your "logic," the only people that will be leaving Denmark if Denmark continues to accept more and more Moslem immigrants will be the true Danes. And they'll be fleeing in droves.

Innocent asylum seekers and refugees, once again. They braught them into their country, let them face it.

It's not like he's ACTUALLY a prophet/ It's kind of insulting to all non muslims to call him that. It's not like we always call jesus the Son of God.just to placate Christians

A familiar story happened in the past. a few hundred years ago Mexico owned Texas and let people from USA freely come and develop it. Soon enough those people that came from USA made the majority. Sound familiar? In the end the people that came from USA demanded independence, even when it was Mexico that invited them in from the first place. An independence war happened in Texas and USA join the war, fighting on the rebels side, hoping that if they would bit Mexico and annex Texas. Mexico lost that war and by losing it they also lost Texas along with half of her land to USA. Hear that Europe? History repeats itself. If the American immigrants demanded independence when they where a majority then why wouldn't the Muslims do the same?

orgs that will supervise the situation.

And anyone saying differently, off with his head.

The real problem is that terrorism was allowed to flourish in the 1970s-1990s against mostly Israeli Jews but some non-Israeli Jewish targets. During those days, the Arab terrorist was hailed as a freedom fighter by the socialists, despite the fact that their main targets were civilians and not military. In fact, the world failed to see the seriousness of the attacks against civilians mostly because these were not "their" civilians. So the problem festered and Israel was left to deal on its own. In fact, Israel was encouraged to negotiate with terrorists and "be reasonable" by Western powers. Arafat was hailed as a hero by liberal Western politicians. In the meantime, many other fringe groups (mostly Muslims and Arabs) saw the success of terrorism (hit unprotected civilian targets, get hero status and get a "seat at the table".) They did the logical thing: they started attacking other targets. Thus 9/11, Madrid bombings, London bombings, etc etc. Ironically, Muslims now are often the main targets by other Muslims. So now, decades after the PLO started their punishing attacks against civilian targets, there is a sudden drop in the legitimacy of how these attacks are viewed by Westerners and even by Muslims and Arabs when the attacks hit closer to home. But, of course, it is too late. The genie is out of the bottle. What is to stop anyone from attacking civilians to get their political viewpoint heard? Did the European politicians who hatched Oslo think that one day bombs would be going off in Sweden and Denmark? Why not? If Arafat was a freedom fighter, why is Osama bin Laden not one also?

If Denmark & the EU will not take strict action against them or any foreign gangs,in 50-60 years time the babies cobras will grow and they will insist on partition.

Well said,hope Eu & Scandinavian countries will read this.

•1 Jan: Somali man armed with axe breaks into house of Danish cartoonist Kurt Westergaard •8 July: Three arrested in Norway and Germany over bomb plot, apparently linked to Danish cartoons •10 Sep: Man held in Copenhagen, suspected of making letter bomb destined for Jyllands-Posten •11 Dec: Man blows himself up in Stockholm, apparently while preparing suicide attack Scandinavia, you are an easy target for the terrorist effort to conquer Europe. Do not take strict action against foreign gangs now and you are out for a two state, (or one state- islam) solution very soon.

I say, you seem not to notice that all those attack attempts you have listed failed. As did the latest one. It would be conceivable that we may be doing something right, possibly.

Thanks God all attacks have failed and you may be doing something right. But dont be proud, Stockholm would have a catastrophy if the exploding jerk was not an idiot on Dec. So I stand by my post #26. It is not funny that all attempts are coming from a particular sort of people.

Me, I thank the Danish PET and the Swedish SÄPO ... but you are wrong in implying that "all attempts are coming from a particular sort of people". According to a sensus by Europol, most "succesful" terror attacks in Europe have come from ultra-nationalists, followed by extreme-leftists. The jihadists rank a long way down the list. This could simply be that after Madrid and London they are pinpointed and under special surveillance. And I agree that it is not funny.