News
IDF fire kills 3 in north Gaza
Ynet
Published: 17.02.11, 09:44
Comment Comment
Print comment Print comment
Back to article
11 Talkbacks for this article
1. 3 terrorists were killed. So what? The U.S.
Sam   (02.17.11)
would have stopped playing this silly game years ago. They would've done what they did in Iraq, taken care of the whole bunch of them at once instead of what Israel does 1-3 terrorist at a time.
2. 3 less....
John ,   NYC   (02.17.11)
bullets for IDF...that is my only concern.
3. When you play with fire, expect to be burnt!
Anat ,   Haderah, Israel   (02.17.11)
4. Hamas trying to prevent internal uprising
by sending idiots ,   to the fence   (02.17.11)
5. This isn't news, it's old hat
BEN JABO ,   ISRAEL   (02.17.11)
6. Sometimes...
John ,   Herzliya, Israel   (02.17.11)
Sometimes I wish that Israel was like Sri Lanka. The way they finished with Tigers should be a model how to deal with terrorists and trouble makers. But unfortunately, they were far away from journalists.
7. is planting explosives in their land offense?
observer   (02.17.11)
killing people on their land is certainly not defense.
8. (Blind) Observer
Stephen in New York   (02.17.11)
The explosives are planted at the border fence which is within Israeli territory and these explosives are intended to kill Israeli soldiers as they pass by on patrol.. You seem confused about the meanings of offense and defense.
9. *7 'observer' - yeah we get the irony. You're funny
Lee ,   Manchester UK   (02.17.11)
10. Kill civilians, call them terrorists and get away with it
M ,   Gaza   (02.18.11)
For heavens' sake, the three were civilians collecting seeshells; their lifetime work. Other workers carried them from the area. The Israeli army continues to kill civilians, call them 'terrorists' and get away with it so easily. In fact, the killing and injuring civilians in order to scare the population away from the border area; mainly farm lands. This is terrorism par excellence!
11. # 10- collecting sea shells at the border fence?
Stephen in New York   (02.18.11)
Back to article