well said tipi. you are thr true iron lady ,hamas will never learn

ok you say be "fair and honest". You are asking for truth and reality, so G-d of Israel, bashem Yeshua, please give this man truth and please L-rd, give this man understanding of Your prophets' words concerning Jerusalem especially in this verse: Zechariah 12:3 And in that day will I make Jerusalem a burdensome stone for all people: all that burden themselves with it shall be cut in pieces, though all the people of the earth be gathered together against it. May the G-d of Israel give you the truth in the innermost place of your heart, driving out every lie and all darkness with knowledge and understanding of His word. Amein !

you accusedmy of being hamas as you claim. i am not any way you are dealing with my on religious bases and you seem very orthodox. i respect your idiology what ever and you are free to think as far as your imagine or read. sometimes you need to compromise rather to take every thing as you have the power. please you and me all think in one god who is the creator, i very much think and believe in my religionmeanwhile respect the other and not trying to cancel their thoughts. the palestinian -israeli conflect from your viewpoint is religious (islam vs judism)!!! you are strong now, try to conevnce the world of your fair attitude. you cant! can you?? I HOPE YOUR INNERMOST OF YOUR HEART WILL BE FILLED WITH TOLERANCE, RESPECT, MODESTY AND HOPE TROWARDS ALL HUMANITY AS GENERAL AND PALESTINIAN IN PARTICULAR TO LIVE IN PEACE AROUND THE BELOVED DOM OF THE ROCK

It's easy to see that History isn't what you teach We recognized the '49 Rhodes Armistice Agreement (Greenline) subsequently referred to as the "Greenline" and pre-'67 Armistice line, it never was a border, in any shape manner or form Your side consistently refused to abide by those very same pre-67 Greenlines, constantly crossing over to attack Israel Now you're crying about milk you spilt yourselves, by constantly denying that the '49 Greenline that you had agreed to at Rhodes We didn't live in peace before or after the Greenline was set in place, so why should we believe, that all of a sudden we'll see a miracle take place ? One more small detail, the Hamas Covenant specifically calls for the destruction of Israel, the also have vowed never to negotiate So, let's just say, I had a tendency to believe them, rather than you Now, put that in your Hookah and puff on it

You have as much of a right to address me as boy as much as Canada has a say in the United Nations Security Council... oh, that's right. Canada was too worthless to get re-elected to the panel. Again, another country that stands behind the U.S for support. Let the big boys do the shit talking, BOB.

from your speech and words i guess we are very far from peaCE. NOW i realize how much dr saeb erikat does suffer from such negotiations. i am very pessemestic of such unachievable peace

Listen to the sounds of rockets exploding as they're being fired into Israel I understand it was 54 yesterday, only 10 a couple of days ago First thing you have to do is convince your leaders to remove the clause in the Hamas Charter that calls for the destruction of Israel and make them agree to sitting down to Peace Talks, which they said that they would never do We left Gaza, as a Shukran, you intensified rocket & mortar fire You basic problem is that your leaders are your worst enemies, each looking out for himself I suggest you pay attention to the following, by Arabs about Arabs, makes an interesting reading http://www.standwithus.com/pdfs/flyers/biglies06.pdf

the pdf file you sent is amazing indeed, and to be honest most palestinians know the all what catstrophes that occured for palestinian are due to the short-sight of arabs unfortunately.(no one can deny that even abo mazen himself as he wrote in your pdf nfile) i dint know what is your job, but i guessyou are lecturer or good reader at least. believe me as you hear or listen to rockets or mortar we do listen and suffer more as you know the concept of relativity (what hamas using nowadyas is uncomparable to what you are using) the go back please to the war at end of 2009. it is horrible and crazy. and indeed out of morality and humanity. you have say as (an educated pereson) that as livni said (enough is enough) believe me most palestinain wish to live in peace and dignity as well as all people. the mistrust or misconfidence is the main problem you dont trust us and we dont as well. you said about the charter of hamas that calls to destroy israel; let me say sir that many israeli parties call for the same "(liberman"israel baitshelano", geola kohen, egodat israel, have you listen to what discription has been awrded by ovada yossef to palestinain . i mean we both have people think stangely ; but at the end they are not the decision makers, they can say whatever they want but i am sure they are limits for actions rather than talking. hamas has been changed since being included to policy, hamas has a broad base in the society(even i am not hamas). moreover notice about haneyyah and mashaal and their acceptance to state on 1967 border. what does this mean???!! that is actually dramatic change in the phelosophy and ideology. i hope peace will cover and spread over all the area amin

I am just speaking from personal experience, having served in two armies, IDF & American One thing I know for a fact is that a tiny .22 can kill as readily as a large cannon round. As matter of fact the M-16 uses a .223 dia bullet, the Kalashnikov’s is slightly larger in diameter, about .28 cal. What Lieberman say's are his own thoughts, he doesn't represent the Government In the same manner, that what you say, are your personal thoughts & expressions I am glad you found the PDF file informative, pass it around, just don’t endanger yourself by doing it The problem is and has been that your leaders are a greater danger to your welfare than you could have imagined Or to put it rather bluntly, they screwed the people to benefit themselves personally. None of the leaders were or are poor men, Arafat for one, stole hundreds of millions of dollars, that’s common knowledge There never, ever was a 1967 Border; originally it was called the "Armistice Line", then the Greenline, then the pre-67 Greenline The final borders were to have been agreed to when a Peace Agreement was finalized, which never came about No matter what it had been called, the Arabs continually violated it, although it had been agreed to at Rhodes in 1948 The '67 lines as they stand now, were the result of the Egyptian/Jordanian/Syrian attack of that year, where the Arabs lost even more land than they had before

I've seen all these statements before at various websites, in my posts I have used some (of these well sources quotes) in my responses to the anti-Israel writers. But I've never seen all of them together in one document. Thanks, I've included it under my Pal myth file. I've organized several files to draw on when responding to the anti-Israel talkbacks. Although lately, Ive noticed my posts with links, don't get through with the same frequency as posts without links. I don't really understand why? It seems if you or I (really anybody) can prove with well sourced info, that the anti-Israel writers are wrong, or lying, that YNET would let that go through. Unless there is some legal ramifications I'm unaware of? But anyway thanks for the new source. Mark from Georgia

If you think there 's a problem with gettng some of these links placed on Y net, you'll think it's a picnic by comparison when you try it with Ma'an Worst of all is Ha'Aretz, they should change the name of that rag to "Biladi" they're so far left, the hammer and sickle should be in their masthead

Heck I stopped posting there because they manipulated the talkbacks much to cynically for my taste. If I wrote anything pro-Israel, Ha'aretz would post all the people who disagreed with me, then would never let me respond! Giving the impression that I was wrong, or I would have responded. But I couldn't because they won their point (which wasn't true they just blocked my well sourced response) It happened to many times. While (at the same time) the anti-Israel writer would post lies, then be able to respond to those who disagreed (the pro-Israel writer) with them. But again blocking responses to the anti-Israel writers, responses. So the Pro-Israel writer couldn't win either way. So once I realized it was a stacked deck and Ha'aretz was carefully editing the talkbacks to give the anti-Israel writers the PR advantage. I just stopped writing there altogether. It annoyed me that they were using the pro-Israel writers to make it appear as if they were wrong, when they just blocked your response. So it was a one-sided argument. I guess Ha'aretz thinks everybody is stupid. Sad that Ha'aretz has to resort to such editorial dishonesty to win points for the Arabs. They are afraid of real debate, because they know they'll lose, and they have an obvious political agenda to hurt Israel.