"A King has every right to quash a rebellion." Wow! Hasn't worked all that well in Italy, Ethiopia, Spain, Cambodia, Vietnam, Laos, Iran, Iraq, Egypt, Tunisia, Yugoslavia, Bulgaria, Russia, Albania, Germany, Greece, Romania and Uganda. And that's just within the last 100 years. I'm sure there are some I have missed, but you get the general idea ..... by the way, when you say that "a king has every right to quash a rebellion" .... have you forgotten exactly how the United States of America came into being?

Qaddafi ordered the bombing. Mass murder is a federal capital crime in the United States. The U.S. would not be killing a head of state, but rather executing a mass murderer.

Seven-eighths of the passengers that were murdered on Pan Am Flight 103 were American citizens. That's why.

Hmm. Let's ask Salvador Allende.

Slobodan Milosevic should have been assassinated for starting a war in the former Yugoslavia?

ok just wait and see WHAT ISRAEL CANT DO.wait and see when ISRAEL will drop the real storm shadow,just wait and see.It will make hiroshima look like a toy weapon.

Well, if Gaddafi, has gotten in the way of American interest, whether directly or indirectly and Obama deems Gaddafi to be a problem, in that case, I would agree. Rather that, than to have American Troops risked in another war, in the Middle East.

There is no way Obama would kill Ghuddafi. His friend Louis Farrakhan and Jerimiah Wright are friends of his. Obama doesn't know what he's doing in Lybia and there is no exit strategy.

Exexutive Order 12333, Part 2.11 reads: 2.11Prohibition on Assassination. No person employed by or acting on behalf of the United States Government shall engage in, or conspire to engage in, assassination. Source: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/codification/executive-order/12333.html#2.11