Ten thousand Persian Houris arriving each month. You sure dream big, Younes!

You proved my point. In your post #18 you write: "suspension of some days is a victory for you? " But according to your source under the subtitle "Conclusion" and I quote: "But if its goal was to destroy a more limited number of centrifuges and set back Iran’s progress in operating the FEP while making detection of the malware difficult, it may have succeeded, at least for a while." So your source says in was effective (but not against every piece of equipment Iran had) and again HERE: "The data in the IAEA reports show that as of August 2010, the number of cascades under vacuum in module A26 had not yet returned to November 2009 levels" So while you said "a Few Days" the IAEA reports at least for 9 months levels "still" were NOT back up up pre-attack levels. IT'S ALSO WORTH MENTIONING, that according to your source under the subtitle "Post-Event Impact", and I QUOTE: "Western cyber experts are skeptical that Iran’s centrifuge program is free of Stuxnet." So as of the date this report was written, Iran may still have Stuxnet malware in their system. AGAIN, THANKS!!! BTW, How does it taste?

No problem man. if you are happy with that! I'm delighted ...... Secondly a study of American Scientists says, Iran is more or less one year of the bomb, when the decision is made! Then dear friend the number of centrifuges installed is not important, iran stopped to install more P1, he is at final phase of IR2 and IR4 but you'll notice that the number of centrifugueses running is the same now as before the attack! What importance can have the number of centrifuges installed! with the result that you know the uranium stocks have progressed normally! I repeat it is a victory for you? well I'm very heureusx for you!

Interestingly, in yesterday's YNET, there was this article. The title: "Iran says targeted by second computer virus" While this new virus is small time compared the stuxnet (meaning it probably did not come from Israel, because it lacks their sophistication), it does mention that stuxnet is still a problem in Iran.So yes I'm good with that. Clearly your statement that it only affected Iran for "a few days" was wrong. That was the point. You said 1) Iran defeated the virus, and 2) The virus only worked for a few days. I proved BOTH of those statements FALSE. That was my point! I was right, you were wrong, simple math, isn't it? Now apparently you seem happy that Iran (a terrorist sponsoring state) is possibly one year away from going nuke? Most people when asked; Would the world be a safer place with Iran in possession of nukes? Say No it would Not. So your in the the minority, in your unexplainable glee, over living in a more dangerous world?

he man wake up, read what I say not to put them in my mouth, stuxnet may be still active but it is contained, and does not prevent Iran from enriching uranium and that remain the key point! everything else is not interresting and yes yes yes stuxnet has stpped Natanz has only a few days is described in all reports, Natanz is now runs faster, and the second worm's strike confirms that the Iranians have learned their lesson, and will not be fooled twice! iran will be a nuclear armed country, no matter what Israel does!