News
Mashaal: Violent resistance by consensus
Ynet
Published: 07.05.11, 08:50
Comment Comment
Print comment Print comment
Back to article
36 Talkbacks for this article
31. Hamas & Jihad
Dave ,   Bs.Aires-Argentina   (05.07.11)
The people of Hamas are murderers and big liers, they will continue with their Jihad against the Jews, targetting innocent civilians. Besides, the Radical Muslims will continue fighting against the Non-Muslim Peoples, that they call "Infidels", with the merciless Islamo-Terrorism. An example of that are the 9/11 in NYC, the bombings against the Jewish NGOs in my country, Argentina, the bombings in London, in Madrid, in the embassies of the US in Africa, the attacks in Mumbai, in Moscow, etc. etc. etc. There is indeed a very long list of the atrocities and Crimes Against the Humanity commited over the whole world by the bloody Jihad, that is the same monster as the Islamo-Terrorism, Al-Qaeda included. Wake Up, Non-Muslim Peoples, principally Europe, it woudn't be peace in the World, until the TOTAL destruction of the terrorist scum of the Islamic Jihad (Islamo-Terrorism) by the POWER of the WEAPONS, that is the only language that this barbarians understand.
32. #26
solomon ,   bklyn   (05.07.11)
In addition to what #28 Abu Yussef al Yehudi writes: Israel has proved that construction is no obstacle. They removed the people and demolished Yamit [and the Egyptians are now "reconsidering" the peace treaty], and removed the people from Gaza and left the "Pals" with an industial infrastructure of hot houses...[which they quickly trashed]. It is Hamas and the "Pals" who are the hypocrites. And yourself as well, perhaps?
33. Who's "consensus"?
William ,   Israel   (05.08.11)
Last poll of "Palestinians" had a majority of them stated the intifada was a terrific mistake and Arafat should have stayed and negotiated with Israel. This same majority stated that a future intifada should NOT be attempted. So, who's "consensus" is Hamas talking about...their members in Damascus? Their supporters in the EU?
34. #2 - not the same as "right to terrorism"
William ,   Israel   (05.08.11)
When the Fogel family was slashed in their sleep, "Palestinians" called it resistance. When an anti-tank missile was shot at an Israeli school bus, "Palestinians" called it resistance. When the IDF hit a car with two Hamas members in it, your ilk called it a war crime. Under Intl Law, any combatant in a legitimate target, especially after Hamas declared war on Israel in 2007. Equally, under Intl Law civilians are NOT to be targeted, else it is terrorism and a war crime. Ergo, if Pallys want to resist, they should be brave and go meet the IDF, not shot a pregnant woman in her own car. Your friends are racist terrorists - get over it.
35. #26 - Israel doesn't need to stop settlements - legally
William ,   Israel   (05.08.11)
1) settlements are being built on specific Jewish land that was ethnically cleansed and stolen in 1948. Under Intl Law, reclaiming it is NOT a crime! 2) Under Oslo Accords which "Palestinians" signed, large settlement blocs would become part of Israel and allowed to expand ONLY for natural growth of existing population. 3) because Abbas sat on his ass for 10 months while the settlement freeze was in place, it simply showed that settlements are not an issue, just an excuse. 4) Israel already offered many times (with the maps to prove it) to dismantle almost all settlements and produce a land swap, Pallys rejected it even though it got them 99.7% of their demands in full. In other words - Pallys can't make a deal where Israel will continue to exist. ...and those actions speak loudest of all.
36. talks is cheap and actions speak louder
zionist forever   (05.08.11)
1) Change the Hamas charter which calls for the destruction of Israel and recognize its right to exist. 2) Say that you want a state but only in the pre 1967 borders and you will accept that everything else belongs to Israel. 3) Commit to non violent resistance and then hand all your weapons over to the UN for destruction. Tell all other palestinians non violent resistance is the only way forward and its a policy everybody should adopt. Hamas is willing to adopt a strategy of non violent resistance at least for the time being means nothing and sounds to me like another classic Hamas hudna strategy. Agree to non violence while your weak and when your stronger and it suits you use violence again and then when your o the run again talk about being non violent again. This little non violence attitude will end if not earlier in September when the PA is talking about uniilaterally declaring a state or after the November election.
Previous talkbacks
Back to article