News
NATO: No intention to intervene in Iran
Associated Press
Published: 03.11.11, 18:58
Comment Comment
Print comment Print comment
Back to article
11 Talkbacks for this article
1. So the US and UK would be on their own
John ,   Alaska   (11.03.11)
With only Israel on their side in this. Makes sense; running away seems to have been NATO's standard tactic, unless they're enabling Al Qaeda to take power in a country.
2. I seem to recall ....
Sarah B ,   U.S.A. / Israel   (11.03.11)
... that he said the same thing about Libya. Fogh seems to walk around in a fog. Like most Danes, perhaps he should stick to guzzling beer.
3. Better if it's not a NATO op.
Stephen in New York   (11.03.11)
Too many cooks in the kitchen. Anyway, most members don't have the assets to play, so why invite them to the party?
4. mr rasmussen How Long Has The International
(11.03.11)
Community been ingaged in dialog with the iranians? How many times has the iranian's SPIT in your face and the rest of the worlds? I THINK Diplomatic Efforts Have Been EXHAUSTED Long Ago!!! However your plans and the worlds plans about have iran enrich URANIUM and Search For ICBM technology failed in your time plan? You and the rest of the world thought iran would have the Bomb by now Right! But the Computer virus dampened your plans and irans. Time for Talk Is Over Now It's Time For Action SWIFT and HARD Like SHOCK and AW Nothing Less For the Worlds Despot country iran: These mad mullahs and the little bearded monkey have Over welcomed their Stay on this Earth and It'd Time To Pay The PIPER. And To Pay In Full.
5. thanks to NATO
MICHEL ,   france   (11.03.11)
TO for releaving the pressure on the ayatollas......
6. Invite Iran to JOIN NATO .One Islamofascist regime is in already!
Alan ,   SA   (11.03.11)
And it has already helped establish MB Libya!
7. Not a good idea
Mike Cato ,   USA   (11.03.11)
As a life-long ardent Zionist, I have to say that I am totally opposed to an attack on Iran. It will only solidify the radical, anti-Israel, anti-Western factions in the country (they will hold themselves up t be the "victims") and it will only delay but not stop the Iranian nuclear weapons project.
8. Rasmussen is a SLIMEBAG !
Chris Rettenmoser ,   Bayerisch Gmain Germ   (11.03.11)
9. An attack must be massive in scope
A Jew ,   Philadelphia, USA   (11.04.11)
Delaying the Iranian nuclear project is pointless. The full airpower (short of nukes) must be unleashed against Iran. The current theocratic Holocaust-denying repressive terrorist-sponsoring regime must be taught a punitive lesson.
10. To: A Jew at No. 9
Sarah B ,   U.S.A. / Israel   (11.04.11)
Why short of nukes? In order for civilization to survive, we need to cut off the head of the viper. That would be the Islamic Republic of Iran. A punitive lesson won't quite do the trick. We need to think complete eradication. We can build something better in its place, just as we did with Germany and Japan.
11. #10 Sarah B , U.S.A. / Israel
Albrecht Klein ,   Germany   (11.04.11)
Nation building won't work with Islamic states.
Back to article